IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i3p484-d1599975.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristics of Changes in Residential Building Layouts in Public Rental Housing Complexes in New Towns of Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Hyojeong Kim

    (Graduate Program in Urban Design, College of Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea)

  • Byungdeok Roh

    (Division of Urban Planning & Landscape Architecture, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Public rental housing complexes in South Korea have played a critical role in addressing housing needs since their introduction in 1989, initially prioritizing rapid quantitative supply. However, challenges such as limited housing quality and evolving socio-economic demands have prompted a shift toward emphasizing qualitative improvements in residential environments. This study investigates changes in residential building layouts in public rental housing complexes constructed during the 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s to understand how planning practices have evolved over time. Using a structured analysis framework, this research examined layout types (orthogonal, parallel, staggered, and mixed) and key planning elements (density, building height, orientation, and building forms) across 24 complexes. The findings reveal a transition from orthogonal layouts with uniform linear flat-type buildings in the 1990s to mixed and parallel layouts incorporating tower-type buildings in the 2000s, reflecting an increased emphasis on density and aesthetics. By the 2010s, parallel layouts persisted but featured diverse building forms, such as modified flat-type buildings and L-shaped configurations, along with variations in floor heights, enhancing spatial efficiency and visual appeal. These changes in the layout forms of residential buildings are particularly driven by the combination of planning characteristics, such as building forms and orientation as well as socio-historical factors. Relevant legal frameworks and institutional systems, such as district unit plans, have played a significant role in shaping these transformations. This study provides insights into the evolution of public housing planning and offers guidance for sustainable and high-quality urban housing development.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyojeong Kim & Byungdeok Roh, 2025. "Characteristics of Changes in Residential Building Layouts in Public Rental Housing Complexes in New Towns of Korea," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:484-:d:1599975
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/484/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/484/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esperanza Vera-Toscano & Victoria Ateca-Amestoy, 2008. "The relevance of social interactions on housing satisfaction," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 86(2), pages 257-274, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matel Anna, 2020. "Tenure Status, Housing Conditions and Residential Satisfaction of Adolescents," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 28(4), pages 24-32, December.
    2. Adeyemo, Omolola Ibijoke & Ilelaboye, Damilola Josephine & Omoni, Adedayo Adebola & Ogundiran, Adeyinka Amos, 2024. "Evaluation of Residential Housing Satisfaction in Ibadan Metropolis, Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(8), pages 432-438, August.
    3. Sylvia Jansen, 2013. "Why is Housing Always Satisfactory? A Study into the Impact of Preference and Experience on Housing Appreciation," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 113(3), pages 785-805, September.
    4. Bonakdar, Said Benjamin & Roos, Michael W. M., 2021. "Dissimilarity effects on house prices: What is the value of similar neighbours?," Ruhr Economic Papers 894, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    5. Ismail, Muhammad & Warsame, Abukar & Wilhelmsson, Mats, 2021. "An exploratory analysis of housing and the distribution of COVID-19 in Sweden," Working Paper Series 21/5, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Real Estate and Construction Management & Banking and Finance.
    6. Chris Foye & David Clapham & Tommaso Gabrieli, 2018. "Home-ownership as a social norm and positional good: Subjective wellbeing evidence from panel data," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(6), pages 1290-1312, May.
    7. Tuyen Quang Tran & Huong Vu, 2018. "A microeconometric analysis of housing and life satisfaction among the Vietnamese elderly," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 849-867, March.
    8. Taimaz Larimian & Arash Sadeghi, 2021. "Measuring urban social sustainability: Scale development and validation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(4), pages 621-637, May.
    9. Shinichi Nagata & Eugene Brusilovskiy & Greg Townley & Bryan McCormick & Elizabeth C. Thomas & Gretchen Snethen & Mark S. Salzer, 2023. "Housing and loneliness among individuals with serious mental illnesses," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 69(3), pages 559-566, May.
    10. Tobias Wolbring, 2017. "Home Sweet Home! Does Moving Have (Lasting) Effects on Housing Satisfaction?," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 18(5), pages 1359-1375, October.
    11. María Navarro, 2019. "Financial, Job and Health Satisfaction: A Comparative Approach on Working People," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Heijs, Joost & Cruz-Calderón, Selene Cruz, 2023. "A novel research strategy of measuring housing disadvantages of vulnerable populations for all income levels: the Propensity Score Matching approach," MPRA Paper 117212, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 04 May 2023.
    13. Marlena Piekut, 2021. "Between Poverty and Energy Satisfaction in Polish Households Run by People Aged 60 and Older," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-30, September.
    14. Said Benjamin Bonakdar & Michael Roos, 2023. "Dissimilarity effects on house prices: what is the value of similar neighbours?," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 18(1), pages 59-86, January.
    15. Karl Vachuska & Jack Brudvig, 2018. "Discourse from #TheRealUW: What Tweets Say about Racial Concerns at a Predominately White Institution," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-13, January.
    16. Yan Ning & Jiaojiao Chen, 2016. "Improving Residential Satisfaction of University Dormitories through Post-Occupancy Evaluation in China: A Socio-Technical System Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Teck-Hong Tan, 2014. "Satisfaction and Motivation of Homeowners Towards Green Homes," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 116(3), pages 869-885, May.
    18. Esfandiar Zebardast, 2009. "The Housing Domain of Quality of Life and Life Satisfaction in the Spontaneous Settlements on the Tehran Metropolitan Fringe," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 90(2), pages 307-324, January.
    19. Wojtek Tomaszewski & Francisco Perales, 2014. "Who Settles for Less? Subjective Dispositions, Objective Circumstances, and Housing Satisfaction," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 181-203, August.
    20. Kim, Jinhyoung & Johnson, Thomas & Pender, John & Fannin, J. Matthew, 2016. "Comprehensive Wealth Measurement and Spatial Hedonic Analysis: Social Amenities as Externalities of Social Capital," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 242362, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:484-:d:1599975. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.