IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i3p439-d1595280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of Ecological Security Pattern and Ecological Restoration Zoning Strategy in the Shandong Section of the Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal

Author

Listed:
  • Chizhou Xu

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276826, China
    Rizhao Key Laboratory of Territory Spatial Planning and Ecological Construction, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276826, China)

  • Yande Jing

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276826, China
    Rizhao Key Laboratory of Territory Spatial Planning and Ecological Construction, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276826, China)

  • Yiwen Zhang

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276826, China
    Rizhao Key Laboratory of Territory Spatial Planning and Ecological Construction, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276826, China)

  • Yingchun Liu

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276826, China
    Rizhao Key Laboratory of Territory Spatial Planning and Ecological Construction, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276826, China)

  • Wenyang Yin

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276826, China
    Rizhao Key Laboratory of Territory Spatial Planning and Ecological Construction, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276826, China)

  • Shiping Zhao

    (Library, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276826, China)

Abstract

(1) Background: Identifying ecological security patterns and restoring the Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal in Shandong is vital for future ecological conservation and maintaining ecosystem sustainability. (2) Methods: The study area was selected, and the InVEST3.9.0 model was used to assess natural-environment ecosystem services. An optimal evaluation approach based on the Minimum Cumulative Resistance model was developed to define the ecological security pattern. (3) Results: There were 20 ecological source areas in the lower and east portions of the study area, mainly grasslands, forests, and water areas. Additionally, 40 ecological corridors, 48 ecological pinch points, and 75 ecological barrier points were generated, densely distributed in the east. The area was divided into five core functional zones. (4) Conclusions: Establishing ecological function zones and considering landscape changes from high-frequency human activities in spatial planning can lead to a more reasonable division of ecological restoration areas. Ecological function zone construction can enhance understanding of implementing ecological security patterns in national land planning and support national ecological security goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Chizhou Xu & Yande Jing & Yiwen Zhang & Yingchun Liu & Wenyang Yin & Shiping Zhao, 2025. "Identification of Ecological Security Pattern and Ecological Restoration Zoning Strategy in the Shandong Section of the Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:439-:d:1595280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/439/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/439/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaoqing Zhao & Qifa Yue & Jianchao Pei & Junwei Pu & Pei Huang & Qian Wang, 2021. "Ecological Security Pattern Construction in Karst Area Based on Ant Algorithm," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Tianyu Zhu & Chengzhi Li & Xiaocao Liu & Xiaobing Zhao, 2024. "Assessing Ecological Restoration in Arid Mining Regions: A Progressive Evaluation System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Yanjie Zhang & Wei Song, 2020. "Identify Ecological Corridors and Build Potential Ecological Networks in Response to Recent Land Cover Changes in Xinjiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-23, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanping Yang & Jianjun Chen & Renjie Huang & Zihao Feng & Guoqing Zhou & Haotian You & Xiaowen Han, 2022. "Construction of Ecological Security Pattern Based on the Importance of Ecological Protection—A Case Study of Guangxi, a Karst Region in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Jinbin Liu & Zexin He & Huading Shi & Yun Zhao & Junke Wang & Anfu Liu & Li Li & Ruifeng Zhu, 2025. "The Analysis of Spatiotemporal Changes in Vegetation Coverage and Driving Factors in the Historically Affected Manganese Mining Areas of Yongzhou City, Hunan Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-25, January.
    3. Xiaoping Zhou & Duanshuai Shen & Xiaokun Gu, 2022. "Influences of Land Policy on Urban Ecological Corridors Governance: A Case Study from Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Yulin Liu & Yi Lu & Dawei Xu & Herui Zhou & Shengnan Zhang, 2024. "Enhancing the MSPA Method to Incorporate Ecological Sensitivity: Construction of Ecological Security Patterns in Harbin City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Xueping Su & Yong Zhou & Qing Li, 2021. "Designing Ecological Security Patterns Based on the Framework of Ecological Quality and Ecological Sensitivity: A Case Study of Jianghan Plain, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-32, August.
    6. Di Zhou & Wei Song, 2021. "Identifying Ecological Corridors and Networks in Mountainous Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Juncheng Xiao & Chunwu Song & Cheng Yan & Zhengzhong Jin & Jia Duo, 2024. "Screening of Suitable Species Combinations for Vegetation Restoration in Ecologically Damaged Areas of Representative Coal Mines on the South Slope of Tianshan Mountain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-15, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:439-:d:1595280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.