IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i9p5699-d810470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construction of Ecological Security Pattern Based on the Importance of Ecological Protection—A Case Study of Guangxi, a Karst Region in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yanping Yang

    (College of Geomatics and Geoinformation, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Jianjun Chen

    (College of Geomatics and Geoinformation, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
    Guangxi Key Laboratory of Spatial Information and Geomatics, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Renjie Huang

    (College of Geomatics and Geoinformation, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Zihao Feng

    (College of Geomatics and Geoinformation, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Guoqing Zhou

    (College of Geomatics and Geoinformation, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
    Guangxi Key Laboratory of Spatial Information and Geomatics, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Haotian You

    (College of Geomatics and Geoinformation, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
    Guangxi Key Laboratory of Spatial Information and Geomatics, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Xiaowen Han

    (College of Geomatics and Geoinformation, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
    Guangxi Key Laboratory of Spatial Information and Geomatics, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

Abstract

The ecological security pattern is an important way to coordinate the contradiction between regional economic development and ecological protection and is conducive to promoting regional sustainable development. This study examines Guangxi, a karst region in China. The ecosystem service function and ecological environment sensitivity were both selected to evaluate the ecological conservation importance, and based on the results of the ecological conservation importance evaluation, suitable patches were selected as ecological sources. Meanwhile, resistance factors were selected from both natural factors and human activities to construct a comprehensive resistance surface, circuit theory was used to identify ecological corridors, ecological pinch points, and ecological barrier points, and ecological protection suggestions were then proposed. The results show that there are 50 patches of ecological sources in Guangxi, with a total area of 60,556.99 km 2 ; 115 ecological corridors, with the longest corridor reaching 194.97 km; 301 ecological pinch points, whose spatial distribution is fragmented; and 286 ecological barrier points, most of which are concentrated in the central part of Guangxi. The results of this study provide a reference for the construction of ecological security patterns and ecological conservation in developing countries and karst areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanping Yang & Jianjun Chen & Renjie Huang & Zihao Feng & Guoqing Zhou & Haotian You & Xiaowen Han, 2022. "Construction of Ecological Security Pattern Based on the Importance of Ecological Protection—A Case Study of Guangxi, a Karst Region in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5699-:d:810470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5699/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5699/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yinan Zhang & Chunli Chu & Lei Liu & Shengguo Xu & Xiaoxue Ruan & Meiting Ju, 2017. "Water Environment Assessment as an Ecological Red Line Management Tool for Marine Wetland Protection," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Monika Egerer & Elsa Anderson, 2020. "Social-Ecological Connectivity to Understand Ecosystem Service Provision across Networks in Urban Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Ephraim M. Hanks & Mevin B. Hooten, 2013. "Circuit Theory and Model-Based Inference for Landscape Connectivity," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 108(501), pages 22-33, March.
    4. Chengjing Nie & Hairong Li & Linsheng Yang & Gemei Zhong & Lan Zhang, 2014. "Socio-Economic Factors of Bacillary Dysentery Based on Spatial Correlation Analysis in Guangxi Province, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-6, July.
    5. Xiaoqing Zhao & Qifa Yue & Jianchao Pei & Junwei Pu & Pei Huang & Qian Wang, 2021. "Ecological Security Pattern Construction in Karst Area Based on Ant Algorithm," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-21, June.
    6. Fangning Shi & Shiliang Liu & Yi An & Yongxiu Sun & Shuang Zhao & Yixuan Liu & Mingqi Li, 2020. "Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Landscape Connectivity and Ecological Network Construction in Long Yangxia Basin at the Upper Yellow River," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Józef Ober & Janusz Karwot, 2022. "Pro-Ecological Behavior: Empirical Analysis on the Example of Polish Consumers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-27, February.
    8. Shana Shi & Baoqing Hu & Yan Yan & Xiaoqing Li & Kaichun Zhou & Chuanyong Tang & Binggeng Xie, 2020. "Dynamic Evolution of the Ecological Carrying Capacity of Poverty-Stricken Karst Counties Based on Ecological Footprints: A Case Study in Northwestern Guangxi, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Jiulin Li & Jiangang Xu & Jinlong Chu, 2019. "The Construction of a Regional Ecological Security Pattern Based on Circuit Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Yu Han & Chaoyue Yu & Zhe Feng & Hanchu Du & Caisi Huang & Kening Wu, 2021. "Construction and Optimization of Ecological Security Pattern Based on Spatial Syntax Classification—Taking Ningbo, China, as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiaquan Duan & Yue ‘e Cao & Bo Liu & Yinyin Liang & Jinyu Tu & Jiahui Wang & Yeyang Li, 2023. "Construction of an Ecological Security Pattern in Yangtze River Delta Based on Circuit Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Pingping Zhang & Mingjie Song & Qiaoqi Lu, 2024. "Mapping Ecological Security Patterns Based on Ecosystem Service Valuation in the Qinling-Daba Mountain Area, China: A Multi-Scenario Study for Development and Conservation Tradeoffs," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-29, October.
    3. Yu Chen & Shuangshuang Liu & Wenbo Ma & Qian Zhou, 2023. "Assessment of the Carrying Capacity and Suitability of Spatial Resources and the Environment and Diagnosis of Obstacle Factors in the Yellow River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-26, February.
    4. Qiaoyin Zhang & Yan Wu & Zhiqiang Zhao, 2024. "Identification of Harbin Ecological Function Degradation Areas Based on Ecological Importance Assessment and Ecological Sensitivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Yanping Lan & Jianjun Chen & Yanping Yang & Ming Ling & Haotian You & Xiaowen Han, 2023. "Landscape Pattern and Ecological Risk Assessment in Guilin Based on Land Use Change," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Xinlei Xu & Siyuan Wang & Gege Yan & Xinyi He, 2023. "Ecological Security Assessment Based on the “Importance–Sensitivity–Connectivity” Index and Pattern Construction: A Case Study of Xiliu Ditch in the Yellow River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Jinfeng Wang & Ya Li & Sheng Wang & Qing Li & Lingfeng Li & Xiaoling Liu, 2023. "Assessment of Multiple Ecosystem Services and Ecological Security Pattern in Shanxi Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tianyue Ma & Jing Li & Shuang Bai & Fangzhe Chang & Zhai Jiang & Xingguang Yan & Jiahao Shao, 2022. "Optimization and Construction of Ecological Security Patterns Based on Natural and Cultivated Land Disturbance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Megan K. Jennings & Katherine A. Zeller & Rebecca L. Lewison, 2021. "Dynamic Landscape Connectivity Special Issue Editorial," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-2, May.
    3. Yulin Liu & Yi Lu & Dawei Xu & Herui Zhou & Shengnan Zhang, 2024. "Enhancing the MSPA Method to Incorporate Ecological Sensitivity: Construction of Ecological Security Patterns in Harbin City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-23, March.
    4. Manuel Wolff & Dagmar Haase & Jörg Priess & Tobias Leander Hoffmann, 2023. "The Role of Brownfields and Their Revitalisation for the Functional Connectivity of the Urban Tree System in a Regrowing City," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Xueping Su & Yong Zhou & Qing Li, 2021. "Designing Ecological Security Patterns Based on the Framework of Ecological Quality and Ecological Sensitivity: A Case Study of Jianghan Plain, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-32, August.
    6. Yanping Yang & Jianjun Chen & Yanping Lan & Guoqing Zhou & Haotian You & Xiaowen Han & Yu Wang & Xue Shi, 2022. "Landscape Pattern and Ecological Risk Assessment in Guangxi Based on Land Use Change," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Fengyu Wang & Shuai Tong & Yun Chu & Tianlong Liu & Xiang Ji, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Key Areas of Territorial Ecological Restoration in Resource-Exhausted Cities: A Case Study of Jiawang District, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, September.
    8. Ephraim M. Hanks, 2017. "Modeling Spatial Covariance Using the Limiting Distribution of Spatio-Temporal Random Walks," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(518), pages 497-507, April.
    9. Hua Liu & Dan-Yang Li & Rong Ma & Ming Ma, 2022. "Assessing the Ecological Risks Based on the Three-Dimensional Ecological Footprint Model in Gansu Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Weilun Feng & Yurui Li, 2021. "Measuring the Ecological Safety Effects of Land Use Transitions Promoted by Land Consolidation Projects: The Case of Yan’an City on the Loess Plateau of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, July.
    11. Chaojie Yu & Junqing Xu & Aihua Zhao & Peiyuan Xiao & Jun Tai & Zhujie Bi & Guangming Li, 2022. "The Generation and Effects for Recyclable Waste from Households in a Megapolis: A Case Study in Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-14, June.
    12. Xiaoyang Liu & Ming Wei & Jian Zeng, 2020. "Simulating Urban Growth Scenarios Based on Ecological Security Pattern: A Case Study in Quanzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, October.
    13. Heying Li & Jiayao Wang & Jianchen Zhang & Fen Qin & Jiyuan Hu & Zheng Zhou, 2021. "Analysis of Characteristics and Driving Factors of Wetland Landscape Pattern Change in Henan Province from 1980 to 2015," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Zixuan Li & Jiang Chang & Cheng Li & Sihao Gu, 2023. "Ecological Restoration and Protection of National Land Space in Coal Resource-Based Cities from the Perspective of Ecological Security Pattern: A Case Study in Huaibei City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27, February.
    15. Modupe Oluyemisi Oyebanji & Rui Alexandre Castanho & Sema Yilmaz Genc & Dervis Kirikkaleli, 2022. "Patents on Environmental Technologies and Environmental Sustainability in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Nana Guo & Xinbin Liang & Lingran Meng, 2022. "Evaluation of the Thermal Environmental Effects of Urban Ecological Networks—A Case Study of Xuzhou City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, June.
    17. Tea Golob & Matej Makarovič, 2022. "Meta-Reflexivity as a Way toward Responsible and Sustainable Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Zhenfeng Wang & Yan Liu & Xiangqun Xie & Xinke Wang & Hong Lin & Huili Xie & Xingzhao Liu, 2022. "Identifying Key Areas of Green Space for Ecological Restoration Based on Ecological Security Patterns in Fujian Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, September.
    19. Xiufeng Cao & Zhaoshun Liu & Shujie Li & Zhenjun Gao, 2022. "Integrating the Ecological Security Pattern and the PLUS Model to Assess the Effects of Regional Ecological Restoration: A Case Study of Hefei City, Anhui Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-19, May.
    20. Anna Claudelin & Kaisa Tuominen & Susanna Vanhamäki, 2022. "Sustainability Perspectives of the Sharing Economy: Process of Creating a Library of Things in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5699-:d:810470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.