IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i2p242-d1576065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Evaluation of TEROS 10 Sensor in Diverse Substrates and Soils of Different Electrical Conductivity Using Low-Cost Microcontroller Settings

Author

Listed:
  • Athanasios Fragkos

    (Department of Natural Resources Management and Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos Str., 11855 Athens, Greece)

  • Dimitrios Loukatos

    (Department of Natural Resources Management and Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos Str., 11855 Athens, Greece)

  • Georgios Kargas

    (Department of Natural Resources Management and Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos Str., 11855 Athens, Greece)

  • Konstantinos G. Arvanitis

    (Department of Natural Resources Management and Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos Str., 11855 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

This study sheds light on the performance of the common high-precision electromagnetic sensor TEROS 10 to estimate volumetric soil water content (θ) from dry to saturation across three different substrates, six different soil types having three different levels of electrical conductivity of soil solutions (EC w ), and in liquids with increasing salinity level under laboratory conditions, by using low-cost but accurate experimental IoT hardware arrangements. This performance was evaluated using statistical analysis metrics such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). It was found that TEROS 10 performance did not conform to the manufacturer’s specifications throughout the full scale range, although in some cases good water content estimation was provided. Some inconsistencies were identified by applying the manufacturer’s calibration equations, and thus recommendations for improvements are provided, aiming to enhance the sensor’s overall performance. TEROS 10 performance across all six soils and three substrates was improved on average from an RMSE of 0.052 and 0.078 cm 3 cm −3 , respectively, by using factory-derived calibration, to 0.031 and 0.031 cm 3 cm −3 by using the multipoint calibration method (CAL). Furthermore, a linear calibration formula, using Raw output as the predictor variable, was tested and resulted in an RMSE of 0.026 and 0.046 cm 3 cm −3 for soils and substrates, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Athanasios Fragkos & Dimitrios Loukatos & Georgios Kargas & Konstantinos G. Arvanitis, 2025. "Performance Evaluation of TEROS 10 Sensor in Diverse Substrates and Soils of Different Electrical Conductivity Using Low-Cost Microcontroller Settings," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:242-:d:1576065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/242/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/242/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimitrios Loukatos & Athanasios Fragkos & George Kargas & Konstantinos G. Arvanitis, 2024. "Implementation and Evaluation of a Low-Cost Measurement Platform over LoRa and Applicability for Soil Monitoring," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-30, November.
    2. Kargas, George & Soulis, Konstantinos X., 2019. "Performance evaluation of a recently developed soil water content, dielectric permittivity, and bulk electrical conductivity electromagnetic sensor," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 568-579.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastián Bañón & Jesús Ochoa & Daniel Bañón & María Fernanda Ortuño & María Jesús Sánchez-Blanco, 2020. "Assessment of the Combined Effect of Temperature and Salinity on the Outputs of Soil Dielectric Sensors in Coconut Fiber," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Domínguez-Niño, Jesús María & Oliver-Manera, Jordi & Girona, Joan & Casadesús, Jaume, 2020. "Differential irrigation scheduling by an automated algorithm of water balance tuned by capacitance-type soil moisture sensors," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    3. Lo, Tsz Him & Rudnick, Daran R. & Singh, Jasreman & Nakabuye, Hope Njuki & Katimbo, Abia & Heeren, Derek M. & Ge, Yufeng, 2020. "Field assessment of interreplicate variability from eight electromagnetic soil moisture sensors," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    4. Panagiota Antonia Petsetidi & George Kargas, 2024. "Evaluation of a Multivariate Calibration Model for the WET Sensor That Incorporates Apparent Dielectric Permittivity and Bulk Soil Electrical Conductivity," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Singh, J. & Lo, T. & Rudnick, D.R. & Irmak, S. & Blanco-Canqui, H., 2019. "Quantifying and correcting for clay content effects on soil water measurement by reflectometers," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 390-399.
    6. Hongjun Chen & Muhammad Awais & Linze Li & Wei Zhang & Mukhtar Iderawumi Abdulraheem & Yani Xiong & Vijaya Raghavan & Jiandong Hu, 2024. "Soil-Specific Calibration Using Plate Compression Filling Technique and Monitoring Soil Biomass Degradation Based on Dielectric Properties," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Konstantinos X. Soulis & Emmanouil Psomiadis & Paraskevi Londra & Dimitris Skuras, 2020. "A New Model-Based Approach for the Evaluation of the Net Contribution of the European Union Rural Development Program to the Reduction of Water Abstractions in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-25, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:242-:d:1576065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.