IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i9p1490-d1478065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of a Multivariate Calibration Model for the WET Sensor That Incorporates Apparent Dielectric Permittivity and Bulk Soil Electrical Conductivity

Author

Listed:
  • Panagiota Antonia Petsetidi

    (Laboratory of Agricultural Hydraulics, Department of Natural Resources Management and Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855 Athens, Greece)

  • George Kargas

    (Laboratory of Agricultural Hydraulics, Department of Natural Resources Management and Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

The measurement of apparent dielectric permittivity (ε s ) by low-frequency capacitance sensors and its conversion to the volumetric water content of soil (θ) through a factory calibration is a valuable tool in precision irrigation. Under certain soil conditions, however, ε s readings are substantially affected by the bulk soil electrical conductivity (EC b ) variability, which is omitted in default calibration, leading to inaccurate θ estimations. This poses a challenge to the reliability of the capacitance sensors that require soil-specific calibrations, considering the EC b impact to ensure the accuracy in θ measurements. In this work, a multivariate calibration equation (multivariate) incorporating both ε s and EC b for the determination of θ by the capacitance WET sensor (Delta-T Devices Ltd., Cambridge, UK) is examined. The experiments were conducted in the laboratory using the WET sensor, which measured θ, ε s , and EC b simultaneously over a range of soil types with a predetermined actual volumetric water content value (θ m ) ranging from θ = 0 to saturation, which were obtained by wetting the soils with four water solutions of different electrical conductivities (EC i ). The multivariate model’s performance was evaluated against the univariate CAL and the manufacturer’s (Manuf) calibration methods with the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). According to the results, the multivariate model provided the most accurate θ estimations, (RMSE ≤ 0.022 m 3 m −3 ) compared to CAL (RMSE ≤ 0.027 m 3 m −3 ) and Manuf (RMSE ≤ 0.042 m 3 m −3 ), across all the examined soils. This study validates the effects of EC b on θ for the WET and recommends the multivariate approach for improving the capacitance sensors’ accuracy in soil moisture measurements.

Suggested Citation

  • Panagiota Antonia Petsetidi & George Kargas, 2024. "Evaluation of a Multivariate Calibration Model for the WET Sensor That Incorporates Apparent Dielectric Permittivity and Bulk Soil Electrical Conductivity," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1490-:d:1478065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1490/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1490/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kargas, George & Soulis, Konstantinos X., 2019. "Performance evaluation of a recently developed soil water content, dielectric permittivity, and bulk electrical conductivity electromagnetic sensor," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 568-579.
    2. Li, Bingze & Wang, Chunmei & Gu, Xingfa & Zhou, Xiang & Ma, Ming & Li, Lei & Feng, Zhuangzhuang & Ding, Tianyu & Li, Xiaofeng & Jiang, Tao & Li, Xiaojie & Zheng, Xingming, 2022. "Accuracy calibration and evaluation of capacitance-based soil moisture sensors for a variety of soil properties," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastián Bañón & Jesús Ochoa & Daniel Bañón & María Fernanda Ortuño & María Jesús Sánchez-Blanco, 2020. "Assessment of the Combined Effect of Temperature and Salinity on the Outputs of Soil Dielectric Sensors in Coconut Fiber," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Domínguez-Niño, Jesús María & Oliver-Manera, Jordi & Girona, Joan & Casadesús, Jaume, 2020. "Differential irrigation scheduling by an automated algorithm of water balance tuned by capacitance-type soil moisture sensors," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    3. Lo, Tsz Him & Rudnick, Daran R. & Singh, Jasreman & Nakabuye, Hope Njuki & Katimbo, Abia & Heeren, Derek M. & Ge, Yufeng, 2020. "Field assessment of interreplicate variability from eight electromagnetic soil moisture sensors," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    4. Singh, J. & Lo, T. & Rudnick, D.R. & Irmak, S. & Blanco-Canqui, H., 2019. "Quantifying and correcting for clay content effects on soil water measurement by reflectometers," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 390-399.
    5. Hongjun Chen & Muhammad Awais & Linze Li & Wei Zhang & Mukhtar Iderawumi Abdulraheem & Yani Xiong & Vijaya Raghavan & Jiandong Hu, 2024. "Soil-Specific Calibration Using Plate Compression Filling Technique and Monitoring Soil Biomass Degradation Based on Dielectric Properties," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Konstantinos X. Soulis & Emmanouil Psomiadis & Paraskevi Londra & Dimitris Skuras, 2020. "A New Model-Based Approach for the Evaluation of the Net Contribution of the European Union Rural Development Program to the Reduction of Water Abstractions in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-25, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1490-:d:1478065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.