IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v216y2019icp390-399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying and correcting for clay content effects on soil water measurement by reflectometers

Author

Listed:
  • Singh, J.
  • Lo, T.
  • Rudnick, D.R.
  • Irmak, S.
  • Blanco-Canqui, H.

Abstract

The presence of clay particles increases the specific surface area of a soil and can affect the calibration of electromagnetic soil water sensors including reflectometers. To quantify and correct for this effect in two relatively new reflectometers, three TDR315 and three CS655 sensors were installed in each of five soils with clay content ranging from 5 to 49%. As the soils were dried in a temperature controlled room, sensor reported soil volumetric water content (θv) according to the factory calibration was compared against reference θv determined by weighing the soils. Sensor reported θv was similar to reference θv in the sand soil (root mean square difference (RMSD) < 0.02 m3 m−3), but the discrepancy was larger for the clayey soils. An increase in clay content tended to cause TDR315 to underestimate low θv and tended to cause CS655 to overestimate θv in a concave down pattern. At the levels evaluated in this experiment, differences in clay content produced a larger effect than differences in temperature (24 versus 35 °C) and salinity (0 versus 3.09 g/L CaCl2) on factory calibration accuracy of both sensors. Soil specific empirical calibrations developed using a square root mixing model fitted the experimental data very closely (R2 > 0.93) for both sensors. By estimating calibration coefficients based on clay content alone to recalculate sensor θv from sensor reported apparent relative permittivity, RMSD from reference θv was reduced by approximately 36% for both sensors as compared with using the factory calibration. Applying the same procedure to independent literature data tended to improve θv accuracy of both sensors increasingly as clay content increased above 20%. The findings suggest that a simple, user-friendly correction for clay content effects may provide initial practical improvement over the factory calibration of a reflectometer in clayey soils.

Suggested Citation

  • Singh, J. & Lo, T. & Rudnick, D.R. & Irmak, S. & Blanco-Canqui, H., 2019. "Quantifying and correcting for clay content effects on soil water measurement by reflectometers," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 390-399.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:216:y:2019:i:c:p:390-399
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.02.024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837741830341X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.02.024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kargas, George & Soulis, Konstantinos X., 2019. "Performance evaluation of a recently developed soil water content, dielectric permittivity, and bulk electrical conductivity electromagnetic sensor," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 568-579.
    2. Singh, J. & Lo, T. & Rudnick, D.R. & Dorr, T.J. & Burr, C.A. & Werle, R. & Shaver, T.M. & Muñoz-Arriola, F., 2018. "Performance assessment of factory and field calibrations for electromagnetic sensors in a loam soil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 87-98.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lo, Tsz Him & Rudnick, Daran R. & Singh, Jasreman & Nakabuye, Hope Njuki & Katimbo, Abia & Heeren, Derek M. & Ge, Yufeng, 2020. "Field assessment of interreplicate variability from eight electromagnetic soil moisture sensors," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    2. Datta, Sumon & Taghvaeian, Saleh, 2023. "Soil water sensors for irrigation scheduling in the United States: A systematic review of literature," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Domínguez-Niño, Jesús María & Oliver-Manera, Jordi & Girona, Joan & Casadesús, Jaume, 2020. "Differential irrigation scheduling by an automated algorithm of water balance tuned by capacitance-type soil moisture sensors," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    2. Lo, Tsz Him & Rudnick, Daran R. & Singh, Jasreman & Nakabuye, Hope Njuki & Katimbo, Abia & Heeren, Derek M. & Ge, Yufeng, 2020. "Field assessment of interreplicate variability from eight electromagnetic soil moisture sensors," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    3. Stepanovic, Strahinja & Rudnick, Daran & Kruger, Greg, 2021. "Impact of maize hybrid selection on water productivity under deficit irrigation in semiarid western Nebraska," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    4. Sebastián Bañón & Jesús Ochoa & Daniel Bañón & María Fernanda Ortuño & María Jesús Sánchez-Blanco, 2020. "Assessment of the Combined Effect of Temperature and Salinity on the Outputs of Soil Dielectric Sensors in Coconut Fiber," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Hajdu, Istvan & Yule, Ian & Bretherton, Mike & Singh, Ranvir & Hedley, Carolyn, 2019. "Field performance assessment and calibration of multi-depth AquaCheck capacitance-based soil moisture probes under permanent pasture for hill country soils," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 332-345.
    6. Panagiota Antonia Petsetidi & George Kargas, 2024. "Evaluation of a Multivariate Calibration Model for the WET Sensor That Incorporates Apparent Dielectric Permittivity and Bulk Soil Electrical Conductivity," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Meetpal S. Kukal & Suat Irmak & Kiran Sharma, 2019. "Development and Application of a Performance and Operational Feasibility Guide to Facilitate Adoption of Soil Moisture Sensors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Singh, Jasreman & Ge, Yufeng & Heeren, Derek M. & Walter-Shea, Elizabeth & Neale, Christopher M.U. & Irmak, Suat & Woldt, Wayne E. & Bai, Geng & Bhatti, Sandeep & Maguire, Mitchell S., 2021. "Inter-relationships between water depletion and temperature differential in row crop canopies in a sub-humid climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    9. Hongjun Chen & Muhammad Awais & Linze Li & Wei Zhang & Mukhtar Iderawumi Abdulraheem & Yani Xiong & Vijaya Raghavan & Jiandong Hu, 2024. "Soil-Specific Calibration Using Plate Compression Filling Technique and Monitoring Soil Biomass Degradation Based on Dielectric Properties," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, May.
    10. Konstantinos X. Soulis & Emmanouil Psomiadis & Paraskevi Londra & Dimitris Skuras, 2020. "A New Model-Based Approach for the Evaluation of the Net Contribution of the European Union Rural Development Program to the Reduction of Water Abstractions in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-25, September.
    11. Lo, Tsz Him & Rudnick, Daran R. & Burr, Charles A. & Stockton, Matthew C. & Werle, Rodrigo, 2019. "Approaches to evaluating grower irrigation and fertilizer nitrogen amount and timing," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 693-706.
    12. Kargas, George & Soulis, Konstantinos X., 2019. "Performance evaluation of a recently developed soil water content, dielectric permittivity, and bulk electrical conductivity electromagnetic sensor," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 568-579.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Calibration; Clay; CS655; Nebraska; Sensor; TDR315;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:216:y:2019:i:c:p:390-399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.