IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i2p229-d1573748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

(Dis-)Continuation of Territoriality: A Framework for Analysis of the Role of Social Practices in (Re-)Production of Space

Author

Listed:
  • Anica Dragutinovic

    (Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands
    Detmold School for Design, Technische Hochschule Ostwestfalen-Lippe, 32756 Detmold, Germany)

  • Susanne Kost

    (Detmold School for Design, Technische Hochschule Ostwestfalen-Lippe, 32756 Detmold, Germany)

Abstract

The paper explores the correlation between the concepts of territoriality and social practices in the context of urban and rural (re-)production of space. It traces the degree of “habitualisation” of certain actions and the behaviour of stakeholders, identifying those defined as practices , and revealing their role in the (dis-)continuation of territoriality of a region. It takes a German region Ostwestfalen-Lippe (OWL) as a case study. The research methodology is based on the practice theory of Andreas Reckwitz and his “praxeological quadrat of cultural analysis”, which is applied in this study. The research process includes (a) semi-structured interviews with the representatives of several institutions from the region, (b) narrative analysis and thematic content structuring of the interviews and (c) synthesis analysis. The study clarifies relations between the artefacts and discourses mentioned by the interviewees, and their impact on the practices of the institutions and others contributing to the (dis-)continuation of territoriality and identity of the region. The main findings are related to the (1) methodological contribution—operationalisation of the “praxeological quadrat of cultural analysis”, and (2) substantive contribution—revealing the role of social practices on the continuation of territoriality of the region. The article presents cultural patterns in the perception of and orientation towards long-past territorialities by the interviewees and makes clear what significance these historical and historicising spatial references have for the spatial planning of the present.

Suggested Citation

  • Anica Dragutinovic & Susanne Kost, 2025. "(Dis-)Continuation of Territoriality: A Framework for Analysis of the Role of Social Practices in (Re-)Production of Space," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-30, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:229-:d:1573748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/229/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/229/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patsy Healey, 2004. "The Treatment of Space and Place in the New Strategic Spatial Planning in Europe," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 45-67, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mónica de Castro-Pardo & Fernando Pérez-Rodríguez & José María Martín-Martín & João C. Azevedo, 2019. "Planning for Democracy in Protected Rural Areas: Application of a Voting Method in a Spanish-Portuguese Reserve," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Han, Wenjing & Zhang, Xiaoling & Zheng, Xian, 2020. "Land use regulation and urban land value: Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Alberto Amore & C Michael Hall & John Jenkins, 2017. "They never said ‘Come here and let's talk about it’: Exclusion and non-decision-making in the rebuild of Christchurch, New Zealand," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(7), pages 617-639, November.
    4. Banai, Reza & Wakolbinger, Tina, 2011. "A measure of regional influence with the analytic network process," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 165-173, December.
    5. Melika Levelt & Leonie Janssen-Jansen, 2013. "The Amsterdam Metropolitan Area Challenge: Opportunities for Inclusive Coproduction in City-Region Governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(3), pages 540-555, June.
    6. Ruiying Liu, 2022. "Long-Term Development Perspectives in the Slow Crisis of Shrinkage: Strategies of Coping and Exiting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-30, August.
    7. Van den Hoek, Duncan & Spit, Tejo & Hartmann, Thomas, 2020. "Certain flexibilities in land-use plans Towards a method for assessing flexibility," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    8. Mark Wiering & Irene Immink, 2006. "When Water Management Meets Spatial Planning: A Policy-Arrangements Perspective," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 24(3), pages 423-438, June.
    9. Neale Blair & James Berry & Stanley McGreal, 2007. "Regional Spatial Policy for Economic Growth: Lessons from the Deployment of Collaborative Planning in Northern Ireland," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(3), pages 439-455, March.
    10. Andrew Jenkins & Arie Croitoru & Andrew T Crooks & Anthony Stefanidis, 2016. "Crowdsourcing a Collective Sense of Place," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, April.
    11. Hans Henriksen & Jens Refsgaard & Anker Højberg & Nils Ferrand & Peter Gijsbers & Huub Scholten, 2009. "Harmonised Principles for Public Participation in Quality Assurance of Integrated Water Resources Modelling," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(12), pages 2539-2554, September.
    12. Federico Savini, 2016. "Self-Organization and Urban Development: Disaggregating the City-Region, Deconstructing Urbanity in Amsterdam," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1152-1169, November.
    13. Edwin Buitelaar & Maaike Galle & Niels Sorel, 2014. "The public planning of private planning: an analysis of controlled spontaneity in the Netherlands," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Stefano Moroni (ed.), Cities and Private Planning, chapter 12, pages 248-268, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Neutens, Tijs & Delafontaine, Matthias & Scott, Darren M. & De Maeyer, Philippe, 2012. "An analysis of day-to-day variations in individual space–time accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 81-91.
    15. Allan Cochrane, 2012. "Making up a Region: The Rise and Fall of the ‘South East of England’ as a Political Territory," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(1), pages 95-108, February.
    16. Karlheinz Knickel & Alexandra Almeida & Lisa Bauchinger & Maria Pia Casini & Bernd Gassler & Kerstin Hausegger-Nestelberger & Jesse Heley & Reinhard Henke & Marina Knickel & Henk Oostindie & Ulla Ovas, 2021. "Towards More Balanced Territorial Relations—The Role (and Limitations) of Spatial Planning as a Governance Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Petra H Roodbol-Mekkes & Adri van den Brink, 2015. "Rescaling Spatial Planning: Spatial Planning Reforms in Denmark, England, and the Netherlands," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(1), pages 184-198, February.
    18. Brendan Murtagh & Peter Shirlow, 2012. "Devolution and the Politics of Development in Northern Ireland," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(1), pages 46-61, February.
    19. Haiyun Xu & Tobias Plieninger & Guohan Zhao & Jørgen Primdahl, 2019. "What Difference Does Public Participation Make? An Alternative Futures Assessment Based on the Development Preferences for Cultural Landscape Corridor Planning in the Silk Roads Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-24, November.
    20. Louis Albrechts, 2010. "More of the Same is Not Enough! How Could Strategic Spatial Planning Be Instrumental in Dealing with the Challenges Ahead?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 37(6), pages 1115-1127, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:229-:d:1573748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.