IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i2p211-d1572655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Suburban Landscape and Public Housing: The Post-Occupancy Evaluation as a Tool for Built Environment Regeneration: A Case Study in the City of Naples, Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Luca Borriello

    (INWARD—National Observatory on Urban Creativity, 80147 Napoli, Italy)

  • Fabiana Forte

    (Department of Architecture and Industrial Design, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 81031 Caserta, Italy)

  • Yvonne Russo

    (Department of Architecture and Industrial Design, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 81031 Caserta, Italy)

  • Silvia Scardapane

    (INWARD—National Observatory on Urban Creativity, 80147 Napoli, Italy)

Abstract

The European Landscape Convention (ELC) acknowledges that the landscape is an important part of the quality of life for people everywhere, in urban areas and the countryside, in degraded areas as well as higher quality areas and recognized as being of outstanding beauty, as well as in everyday areas. Nowadays, many suburbs, arisen as public housing neighborhoods and originally located in peri-urban areas, in addition to constituting a substantial part of the built heritage, are increasingly being configured as new strategic areas, redefining the daily landscape of its users. With the post-occupancy evaluation method (POE), it is possible to assess several aspects of the performance of buildings or open spaces from the users’ perspective, taking into consideration objective and subjective factors. It is a multi-method approach, combining interviews, customer satisfaction surveys, behavioral observation, etc. With this perspective, the article, dealing with the ‘Parco dei Murales’, which is a complex of public housing localized in the Ponticelli suburb in the city of Naples (Italy), aims to understand the visual and qualitative perception of the suburban landscape in the light of the transformation processes that have occurred in recent years. For this purpose, starting from the results of the first application of a user satisfaction survey, the post occupancy evaluation has been applied, analyzing the functional, social, and perceptual attributes of the open spaces of the park.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca Borriello & Fabiana Forte & Yvonne Russo & Silvia Scardapane, 2025. "Suburban Landscape and Public Housing: The Post-Occupancy Evaluation as a Tool for Built Environment Regeneration: A Case Study in the City of Naples, Italy," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-28, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:211-:d:1572655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/211/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/211/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ezio Micelli & Francesco Campagnari & Luca Lazzarini & Elena Ostanel & Naomi Pedri Stocco, 2024. "They Like to Do It in Public: A Quantitative Analysis of Culture-Led Regeneration Projects in ITALY," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Wang, Hao & Zhao, Yizhu & Gao, Xichen & Gao, Boyang, 2021. "Collaborative decision-making for urban regeneration: A literature review and bibliometric analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    3. Yun Zhou & Alexia Sanz-Hernández & Silvia María Hernández-Muñoz, 2024. "Artistic Interventions in Urban Renewal: Exploring the Social Impact and Contribution of Public Art to Sustainable Urban Development Goals," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Marco Rossitti & Alessandra Oppio & Francesca Torrieri & Marta Dell’Ovo, 2023. "Tactical Urbanism Interventions for the Urban Environment: Which Economic Impacts?," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Pacheco & Helena Madureira & Ana Monteiro, 2024. "Examining Post-Pandemic Urban Transformations: A Literature Review on COVID-19’s Influence on Urban Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-32, November.
    2. Yifei Hu & Liu Wu & Ni Li & Tianwei Zhao, 2024. "Multi-Agent Decision-Making in Construction Engineering and Management: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-24, August.
    3. Yin Ma & Minrui Zheng & Xinqi Zheng & Yi Huang & Feng Xu & Xiaoli Wang & Jiantao Liu & Yongqiang Lv & Wenchao Liu, 2023. "Land Use Efficiency Assessment under Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Reena Tiwari & Courtney Babb & Marian Tye & Fatmaelzahraa Hussein, 2024. "The Wharf Street Smart Park Story: A Guide to Navigating Multi-Stakeholder Innovation in Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Rubina Canesi, 2022. "Urban Policy Sustainability through a Value-Added Densification Tool: The Case of the South Boston Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-12, July.
    6. Kaijian Li & Ruopeng Huang & Guiwen Liu & Asheem Shrestha & Xinyue Fu, 2022. "Social Capital in Neighbourhood Renewal: A Holistic and State of the Art Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, July.
    7. Sessa, Maria Rosaria & Russo, Alessio & Sica, Francesco, 2022. "Opinion paper on green deal for the urban regeneration of industrial brownfield land in Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    8. Guiwen Liu & Cheng Li & Taozhi Zhuang & Yuhan Zheng & Hongjuan Wu & Jian Tang, 2022. "Determining the Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Urban Regeneration Projects in China on the City Scale: The Case of Shenzhen," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, July.
    9. Fangyun Xie & Guiwen Liu & Taozhi Zhuang, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review of Urban Regeneration Governance for Developing Appropriate Governance Arrangements," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-28, May.
    10. Yunxi Bai & Shanshan Wu & Yunjie Zhang, 2023. "Exploring the Key Factors Influencing Sustainable Urban Renewal from the Perspective of Multiple Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, July.
    11. Xiaoru Zheng & Chunling Sun & Jingjing Liu, 2024. "Exploring stakeholder engagement in urban village renovation projects through a mixed-method approach to social network analysis: a case study of Tianjin," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Aftabi, Pegah & Bahramjerdi, Somayeh Fadaei Nezhad, 2023. "Developing a decision-making framework within the management of historical cities: Towards integrated conservation and development of the Roudaki neighbourhood," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    13. Zakariye Mohamed Said & Serdar Dindar, 2024. "Key Challenges and Strategies in the Evaluation of Sustainable Urban Regeneration Projects: Insights from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-30, November.
    14. Dejana Nedučin & Milena Krklješ & Svetlana K. Perović, 2021. "Demolition-Based Urban Regeneration from a Post-Socialist Perspective: Case Study of a Neighborhood in Novi Sad, Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-29, September.
    15. Margherita Pazzini & Rachele Corticelli & Claudio Lantieri & Cecilia Mazzoli, 2022. "Multi-Criteria Analysis and Decision-Making Approach for the Urban Regeneration: The Application to the Rimini Canal Port (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-28, December.
    16. Alessandro Gretter & Anastasia Nikologianni & Alessandro Betta & Linda Lugli & Lavinia Laiti & Roberto Barbiero, 2024. "A Multi-Approach and Collaborative Pathway towards Designing Climate Strategies: The Case of Trentino, a Mountainous Region in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-26, May.
    17. Qiyu Gai & Zijia Li & Huifeng Hu, 2022. "Strategies for China’s Historic Districts Regeneration in Responding to Public Health Emergencies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, October.
    18. Jue Wang & Yi Yang & Huan Huang & Fan Wang, 2022. "Stakeholder Management in Government-Led Urban Regeneration: A Case Study of the Eastern Suburbs in Chengdu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, April.
    19. Can Kara & Aminreza Iranmanesh, 2022. "Modelling and Assessing Sustainable Urban Regeneration for Historic Urban Quarters via Analytical Hierarchy Process," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Xiquan Zhang & Lizhu Du & Xiaoyun Song, 2024. "Identification of Urban Renewal Potential Areas and Analysis of Influential Factors from the Perspective of Vitality Enhancement: A Case Study of Harbin City’s Core Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-28, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:211-:d:1572655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.