IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i8p1171-d1445969.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying the Authenticity of Plantscapes through Classics: A Case Study of Beijing Suburbs in the Qing Dynasty

Author

Listed:
  • Dong Xu

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, 35-Qinghua East Road, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Junda Zhu

    (Zhong Jiao Highway Planning and Design Institute, 296-Chaoyangmen Inner Street, Beijing 100010, China)

  • Zhiyu Chen

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, 35-Qinghua East Road, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Nan Hu

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, 35-Qinghua East Road, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Peiyan Wang

    (School of Art and Design, Beijing Forestry University, 35-Qinghua East Road, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yunyuan Li

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, 35-Qinghua East Road, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

The plantscapes surrounding historical gardens hold significant value, reflecting the natural pristine state as well as demonstrating the cultural attributes of the landscape. This study aims to develop a method for identifying the characteristics of historic plantscapes and to recognize the authenticity of historic landscapes from the perspective of plant elements. Our method combines textual and geospatial data analysis to examine the plant species, their relationships and combinations, and spatial distribution. The case study focuses on the Beijing suburbs during the Qing Dynasty, as documented in A Collection of Past Events in Beijing . We identified 658 plants recorded, encompassing 44 families and 58 genera. These plants were categorized into 7 groups based on the growth type and morphological characteristics, leading to 54 plant relationship outcomes, 107 plant combination scenarios, 5 plant combination categories, and 7 representative plant combinations. Additionally, we mapped the spatial distribution of plants, forming 16 plantscape groups and depicting the spatial kernel density distribution of important plants. We also determined the characteristics of plantscapes in different directions in the suburb. Our findings advocate for respecting the historical development of the plantscape and understanding its evolution, particularly emphasizing the use of high-quality native plants and plant combinations.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong Xu & Junda Zhu & Zhiyu Chen & Nan Hu & Peiyan Wang & Yunyuan Li, 2024. "Identifying the Authenticity of Plantscapes through Classics: A Case Study of Beijing Suburbs in the Qing Dynasty," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:8:p:1171-:d:1445969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/8/1171/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/8/1171/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mehmet F. Dicle & Betul Dicle, 2018. "Content analysis: Frequency distribution of words," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 18(2), pages 379-386, June.
    2. Robert R. Braam & Henk F. Moed & Anthony F. J. van Raan, 1991. "Mapping of science by combined co‐citation and word analysis. I. Structural aspects," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 42(4), pages 233-251, May.
    3. Robert R. Braam & Henk F. Moed & Anthony F. J. van Raan, 1991. "Mapping of science by combined co‐citation and word analysis. II: Dynamical aspects," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 42(4), pages 252-266, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ying Huang & Wolfgang Glänzel & Lin Zhang, 2021. "Tracing the development of mapping knowledge domains," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 6201-6224, July.
    2. Bettencourt, Luís M.A. & Kaiser, David I. & Kaur, Jasleen, 2009. "Scientific discovery and topological transitions in collaboration networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 210-221.
    3. Ballester, Omar & Penner, Orion, 2022. "Robustness, replicability and scalability in topic modelling," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    4. MaruÅ¡a Premru & Matej ÄŒerne & SaÅ¡a BatistiÄ, 2022. "The Road to the Future: A Multi-Technique Bibliometric Review and Development Projections of the Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    5. Xie, Qing & Zhang, Xinyuan & Song, Min, 2021. "A network embedding-based scholar assessment indicator considering four facets: Research topic, author credit allocation, field-normalized journal impact, and published time," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(4).
    6. Trappey, Amy J.C. & Wei, Ann Y.E. & Chen, Neil K.T. & Li, Kuo-An & Hung, L.P. & Trappey, Charles V., 2023. "Patent landscape and key technology interaction roadmap using graph convolutional network – Case of mobile communication technologies beyond 5G," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1).
    7. Ryosuke L. Ohniwa & Kunio Takeyasu & Aiko Hibino, 2022. "Researcher dynamics in the generation of emerging topics in life sciences and medicine," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(2), pages 871-884, February.
    8. Lubango, Louis Mitondo & Pouris, Anastassios, 2010. "Is patenting of technical inventions in university sectors impeding the flow of scientific knowledge to the public? a case study of South Africa," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 241-248.
    9. Yeow Chong Goh & Xin Qing Cai & Walter Theseira & Giovanni Ko & Khiam Aik Khor, 2020. "Evaluating human versus machine learning performance in classifying research abstracts," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 1197-1212, November.
    10. Mora, Luca & Deakin, Mark & Reid, Alasdair, 2019. "Combining co-citation clustering and text-based analysis to reveal the main development paths of smart cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 56-69.
    11. Kamal Sanguri & Atanu Bhuyan & Sabyasachi Patra, 2020. "A semantic similarity adjusted document co-citation analysis: a case of tourism supply chain," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 233-269, October.
    12. Mansour Haghighat & Javad Hayatdavoudi, 2021. "How hot are hot papers? The issue of prolificacy and self-citation stacking," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 565-578, January.
    13. David Chavalarias & Quentin Lobbé & Alexandre Delanoë, 2022. "Draw me Science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(1), pages 545-575, January.
    14. Wullum Nielsen, Mathias & Börjeson, Love, 2019. "Gender diversity in the management field: Does it matter for research outcomes?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(7), pages 1617-1632.
    15. David Chavalarias & Jean-Philippe Cointet, 2008. "Bottom-up scientific field detection for dynamical and hierarchical science mapping, methodology and case study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 75(1), pages 37-50, April.
    16. Ding, Ying, 2011. "Community detection: Topological vs. topical," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 498-514.
    17. Ciro D. Esposito & Balazs Szatmari & Jonathan M. C. Sitruk & Nachoem M. Wijnberg, 2024. "Getting off to a good start: emerging academic fields and early-stage equity financing," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1591-1613, April.
    18. Liu, Yunmei & Yang, Liu & Chen, Min, 2021. "A new citation concept: Triangular citation in the literature," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2).
    19. Yang Li & Frank Neffke, 2022. "Relatedness in regional development: in search of the right specification," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2208, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Apr 2022.
    20. Sumita Raghuram & Philipp Tuertscher & Raghu Garud, 2010. "Research Note ---Mapping the Field of Virtual Work: A Cocitation Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 983-999, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:8:p:1171-:d:1445969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.