IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i6p809-d1409841.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deciphering Land Use Transitions in Rural China: A Functional Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Yanfeng Jiang

    (School of Public Administration, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Tiantian Wang

    (School of Public Administration, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Yuli Xu

    (School of Public Administration, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

Abstract

Although research on land use transitions has gradually received widespread attention since its introduction to China at the beginning of the new millennium, the lack of a clear portrayal of the transitional characteristics and pathways of land use at the theoretical level has prevented this research from providing adequate support for the regulation and management of rural land use activities. This study aims to bridge this research gap from a functional perspective, since the transition of land system functions—also known as land use functions—heralds the completion of a regional land use transition. The methods employed included a literature review and theoretical analysis. The results show the following: (1) the relationships between land use morphology, land use multifunctionality, and land use functions transition (LUFT) were identified; (2) the connotation of the multifunctional agriculture transition theory was analyzed, and the applicability and limitations of drawing on the theory for researching the transition of land use functions in rural China elucidated; (3) a method for characterizing LUFT is proposed from the “state” and “quality”; (4) a theoretical framework for the LUFT was constructed and anchored in transition theory; and (5) it was summarized that there are three transitional pathways: weak-strong, strong-weak, and dynamic balance. In conclusion, while theories originating from the West can provide references for Chinese research, the significant difference between their socio-economic backgrounds necessitates reconstructing these theories in the light of the actual situation in rural China. The theoretical construction of land use transitions from a functional perspective can more clearly delineate the process, the trend, and the characteristics of the transitions of rural land use, thus offering valuable insights for the regulation and management of land use.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanfeng Jiang & Tiantian Wang & Yuli Xu, 2024. "Deciphering Land Use Transitions in Rural China: A Functional Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:809-:d:1409841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/809/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/809/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geoff A. Wilson, 2014. "Community resilience: path dependency, lock-in effects and transitional ruptures," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(1), pages 1-26, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Douglas K. Bardsley & Annette M. Bardsley & Marco Conedera, 2023. "The dispersion of climate change impacts from viticulture in Ticino, Switzerland," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Maurizio Carta & Daniele Ronsivalle, 2020. "Neoanthropocene Raising and Protection of Natural and Cultural Heritage: A Case Study in Southern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Digby Race & Supriya Mathew & Matthew Campbell & Karl Hampton, 2016. "Understanding climate adaptation investments for communities living in desert Australia: experiences of indigenous communities," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 461-475, December.
    4. Roemer, Kelli F. & Haggerty, Julia H., 2021. "Coal communities and the U.S. energy transition: A policy corridors assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    5. Fielke, Simon J. & Kaye-Blake, William & Mackay, Alec & Smith, Willie & Rendel, John & Dominati, Estelle, 2018. "Learning from resilience research: Findings from four projects in New Zealand," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 322-333.
    6. Susanne Moser & Sara Meerow & James Arnott & Emily Jack-Scott, 2019. "The turbulent world of resilience: interpretations and themes for transdisciplinary dialogue," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 21-40, March.
    7. Nurlykhan Aljanova & Emina Yessekeyeva & Yerkinay Ernst, 2023. "A Process Model of Combining Life Trauma and Life Passion into Cultural Entrepreneurship: A Case Study of Art-Shelter Bunker Theatre," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 12(2), pages 152-165, August.
    8. Męczyński Michał & Ciesiółka Przemysław, 2022. "Regional Green Transition: Cases of Polish and Russian Regions," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 41(4), pages 165-177, December.
    9. Digby Race & Supriya Mathew & Matthew Campbell & Karl Hampton, 2016. "Are Australian Aboriginal Communities Adapting to a Warmer Climate? A Study of Communities Living in Semi-Arid Australia," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(3), pages 208-208, April.
    10. Christian M Rogerson & Etienne Nel, 2016. "Redressing inequality in South Africa: The spatial targeting of distressed areas," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 31(1-2), pages 28-41, February.
    11. Zhanping Hu & Qian Forrest Zhang, 2022. "The Resilience of Diversified Clusters: Reconfiguring Commodity Networks in Rural China during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, March.
    12. Fielke, Simon & Taylor, Bruce & Jakku, Emma, 2020. "Digitalisation of agricultural knowledge and advice networks: A state-of-the-art review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    13. Fischer, Alexandra Paige, 2018. "Pathways of adaptation to external stressors in coastal natural-resource-dependent communities: Implications for climate change," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 235-248.
    14. Vassilis Detsis & Helen Briassoulis & Constantinos Kosmas, 2017. "The Socio-Ecological Dynamics of Human Responses in a Land Degradation-Affected Region: The Messara Valley (Crete, Greece)," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-23, June.
    15. Fulvio Biddau & Sonia Brondi & Paolo Francesco Cottone, 2022. "Unpacking the Psychosocial Dimension of Decarbonization between Change and Stability: A Systematic Review in the Social Science Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, April.
    16. Giovanni Quaranta & Jane Brandt & Rosanna Salvia, 2016. "The Local Food Processing House: a social innovation for rural development in Campania," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 227-236.
    17. Reis, Tiago N.P. dos & Bastos Lima, Mairon G. & Russo Lopes, Gabriela & Meyfroidt, Patrick, 2024. "Not all supply chains are created equal: The linkages between soy local trade relations and development outcomes in Brazil," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    18. Etienne Nel & Teresa Stevenson, 2014. "The catalysts of small town economic development in a free market economy: A case study of New Zealand," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 29(4-5), pages 486-502, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:809-:d:1409841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.