IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i6p756-d1403625.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Between Struggle, Forgetfulness, and Placemaking: Meanings and Practices among Social Groups in a Metropolitan Urban Park

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Rosenbluth

    (Escuela de Psicología, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, 7941169 Santiago, Chile)

  • Teresa Ropert

    (Escuela de Psicología, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, 7941169 Santiago, Chile)

  • Vicente Rivera

    (Escuela de Psicología, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, 7941169 Santiago, Chile)

  • Matías Villalobos-Morgado

    (Escuela de Psicología, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, 7941169 Santiago, Chile)

  • Yerko Molina

    (Escuela de Psicología, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, 7941169 Santiago, Chile)

  • Ignacio C. Fernández

    (Facultad de Artes Liberales, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, 7941169 Santiago, Chile)

Abstract

Urban spatial segregation in Santiago de Chile, a prevalent feature of Latin American cities, underscores socioeconomic disparities and shapes the city’s socio-spatial dynamics. This segregation, driven by land prices and private ownership, has pushed disadvantaged groups to the periphery and limited their access to desirable areas reserved for wealthier segments of society. Quebrada Macul Park, situated within this segregated urban landscape, serves as an emblematic case that challenges and expands the classical definition of urban segregation. It exemplifies the complex negotiations over space utilization among social groups, defined by socioeconomic, generational, and interest-based differences. This study employs micro-segregation studies in a broad sense, both as a conceptual framework and as a methodological tool to analyze these dynamics. Through qualitative methodologies, including six in-depth interviews with diverse stakeholders (social and ecological activists, longtime residents, and park employees) and five participant observations, the research investigates the varied uses and meanings attributed to the park. The findings reveal that the park’s evolution from a space frequented by low-income dwellers to a diverse metropolitan park has sparked debates over its public versus private character, mirroring the power struggles among distinct social factions. The park serves as a profound identity marker for its historical inhabitants, who initially fought for the right to use it and today experience nostalgia due to its widespread popularity. Meanwhile, the struggle to establish the park as a public space challenges the city’s segregation dynamics and might promote social cohesion within urban natural environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Rosenbluth & Teresa Ropert & Vicente Rivera & Matías Villalobos-Morgado & Yerko Molina & Ignacio C. Fernández, 2024. "Between Struggle, Forgetfulness, and Placemaking: Meanings and Practices among Social Groups in a Metropolitan Urban Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-26, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:756-:d:1403625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/756/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/756/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nick Bailey & Ade Kearns & Mark Livingston, 2012. "Place Attachment in Deprived Neighbourhoods: The Impacts of Population Turnover and Social Mix," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 208-231.
    2. Ramóna Vámos & Gyula Nagy & Zoltán Kovács, 2023. "The Construction of the Visible and Invisible Boundaries of Microsegregation: A Case Study from Szeged, Hungary," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agata Górny & Sabina Toruńczyk-Ruiz, 2015. "Relative deprivation and ‘the diversity effect’ in explaining neighbourhood attachment: Alternative or complementary mechanisms?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(5), pages 984-990, April.
    2. Shi Chen & Yi Sun & Bo Kyong Seo, 2022. "The Effects of Public Open Space on Older People’s Well-Being: From Neighborhood Social Cohesion to Place Dependence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, December.
    3. John Bwalya & Cecil Seethal, 2016. "Neighbourhood context and social cohesion in Southernwood, East London, South Africa," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(1), pages 40-56, January.
    4. Sabine Weck & Isabel Ramos Lobato, 2015. "Social exclusion: Continuities and discontinuities in explaining local patterns," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 30(7), pages 765-782, November.
    5. Si-ming Li & Sanqin Mao & Huimin Du, 2019. "Residential mobility and neighbourhood attachment in Guangzhou, China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(3), pages 761-780, May.
    6. Kathy Burrell, 2016. "Lost in the ‘churn’? Locating neighbourliness in a transient neighbourhood," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(8), pages 1599-1616, August.
    7. Richard Lawder & David Walsh & Ade Kearns & Mark Livingston, 2014. "Healthy Mixing? Investigating the Associations between Neighbourhood Housing Tenure Mix and Health Outcomes for Urban Residents," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(2), pages 264-283, February.
    8. Łaszkiewicz, Edyta & Kronenberg, Jakub & Marcińczak, Szymon, 2018. "Attached to or bound to a place? The impact of green space availability on residential duration: The environmental justice perspective," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(PB), pages 309-317.
    9. Byungsuk Kim & Jina Park, 2018. "Effects of Commercial Activities by Type on Social Bonding and Place Attachment in Neighborhoods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, May.
    10. Vassilis P. Arapoglou & Stavros Nikiforos Spyrellis, 2024. "Arrival Infrastructures: Segregation of Displaced Migrants and Processes of Urban Change in Athens," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-21, March.
    11. Rebecca Wickes & Renee Zahnow & Jonathan Corcoran & John R Hipp, 2019. "Neighbourhood social conduits and resident social cohesion," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(1), pages 226-248, January.
    12. Gabriel Otero & Quentin Ramond & María Luisa Méndez & Rafael Carranza & Felipe Link & Javier Ruiz-Tagle, 2024. "The damages of stigma, the benefits of prestige: Examining the consequences of perceived residential reputations on neighbourhood attachment," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(3), pages 462-494, February.
    13. Yung Yau, 2020. "Direct and Indirect Impacts of Housing Tenure Mix on Antisocial Behavior: A Study of Hong Kong’s Private Housing Communities," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Nissa Finney & Stephen Jivraj, 2013. "Ethnic Group Population Change and Neighbourhood Belonging," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(16), pages 3323-3341, December.
    15. María Luisa Méndez & Gabriel Otero & Felipe Link & Ernesto López Morales & Modesto Gayo, 2021. "Neighbourhood cohesion as a form of privilege," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(8), pages 1691-1711, June.
    16. Claire Bynner, 2019. "Intergroup relations in a super-diverse neighbourhood: The dynamics of population composition, context and community," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(2), pages 335-351, February.
    17. Yilin Sun & Li Zhu & Jiang Li & Ni Zhang & Yue Tang & Xiaokang Wang & Honglin Wu, 2023. "Study on the Influence and Optimization of Neighborhood Space on the Perceived Restoration of Rural Left-Behind Older People: The Case of Changsha, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    18. Agata Górny & Sabina Toruńczyk-Ruiz, 2014. "Neighbourhood Attachment in Ethnically Diverse Areas: The Role of Interethnic Ties," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(5), pages 1000-1018, April.
    19. Fenne M Pinkster & Matthieu Permentier & Karin Wittebrood, 2014. "Moving Considerations of Middle-Class Residents in Dutch Disadvantaged Neighborhoods: Exploring the Relationship between Disorder and Attachment," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(12), pages 2898-2914, December.
    20. Nick Bailey & Guanpeng Dong & Jon Minton & Gwilym Pryce, 2018. "Reconsidering the Relationship between Air Pollution and Deprivation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:756-:d:1403625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.