IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i5p647-d1391522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Strategy Optimization of Green Agricultural Production Trusteeship to Promote Black Land Protection

Author

Listed:
  • Li Ma

    (College of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Jiahao Lin

    (College of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Chuangang Li

    (College of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Yun Teng

    (College of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

Abstract

The whole trusteeship of green agricultural production plays an important role in promoting the protection of black land, and it is particularly crucial to clarify the behavioral characteristics and game relationships of agents involved in the whole trusteeship. This study uses the dynamic evolutionary game method to construct a tripartite evolutionary game model of governments, service organizations and farmers participating in the whole trusteeship of green agricultural production, aiming to come up with effective strategies to promote the widespread application of green agricultural production trusteeship and achieve agricultural green development. The results are as follows: (1) At present, the agricultural production model in Northeast China is dominated by traditional agricultural production and supplemented by green agricultural production. (2) Incentive and punitive measures will encourage agents to adopt positive strategies. (3) In areas with a poor awareness of green agricultural production trusteeship, the government’s incentive and punishment measures for farmers and service organizations are imbalanced. (4) The relatively high cost of trusteeship leads to a lack of market competitiveness, which has a negative impact on service organizations promoting green agricultural production trusteeship. This study provides an effective reference for improving the overall implementation effect of black land protection in Northeast China.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Ma & Jiahao Lin & Chuangang Li & Yun Teng, 2024. "Research on Strategy Optimization of Green Agricultural Production Trusteeship to Promote Black Land Protection," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-30, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:5:p:647-:d:1391522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/5/647/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/5/647/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geeta Bhandari & Archna Dhasmana & Parul Chaudhary & Sanjay Gupta & Saurabh Gangola & Ashulekha Gupta & Sarvesh Rustagi & Sudhir S. Shende & Vishnu D. Rajput & Tatiana Minkina & Sumira Malik & Petr Sl, 2023. "A Perspective Review on Green Nanotechnology in Agro-Ecosystems: Opportunities for Sustainable Agricultural Practices & Environmental Remediation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Xiuru Zhang & Lin Zhang & Tangzhe Nie, 2023. "Study on the Impact of Social Capital on Farmers’ Decision-Making Behavior of Adopting Trusteeship Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Yuxuan Xu & Hongbin Liu & Jie Lyu & Ying Xue, 2022. "What Influences Farmers’ Adoption of Soil Testing and Formulated Fertilization Technology in Black Soil Areas? An Empirical Analysis Based on Logistic-ISM Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-24, November.
    4. Feng Zhou & Chunhui Wen, 2023. "Research on the Level of Agricultural Green Development, Regional Disparities, and Dynamic Distribution Evolution in China from the Perspective of Sustainable Development," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-47, July.
    5. Yaping He & Dandan Fu & Hua Zhang & Xiudong Wang, 2023. "Can Agricultural Production Services Influence Smallholders’ Willingness to Adjust Their Agriculture Production Modes? Evidence from Rural China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Ana Ania, 2005. "The evolutionary stability of perfectly competitive behavior," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 26(3), pages 497-516, October.
    7. Friedman, Daniel, 1991. "Evolutionary Games in Economics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 637-666, May.
    8. Jorgen W. Weibull, 1997. "Evolutionary Game Theory," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262731215, April.
    9. Yan Qu & Chulin Pan & Hongpeng Guo, 2021. "Factors Affecting the Promotion of Conservation Tillage in Black Soil—The Case of Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-14, August.
    10. Mahsa Fatemi & Kurosh Rezaei-Moghaddam & Ezatollah Karami & Dariush Hayati & Mathis Wackernagel, 2021. "An integrated approach of Ecological Footprint (EF) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in human ecology: A base for planning toward sustainability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-31, April.
    11. Xiaoyan Sun & Shuya Guang & Jingjing Cao & Fengying Zhu & Jianxu Liu & Songsak Sriboonchitta, 2023. "Effect of Agricultural Production Trusteeship on Agricultural Carbon Emission Reduction," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Atul P. Kulkarni & Mahendra P. Tripathi & Damodar Gautam & Keshab B. Koirala & Manoj Kandel & Dhruba Regmi & Sudha Sapkota & Pervez H. Zaidi, 2023. "Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Heat-Tolerant Maize Hybrids in the Mid-Western Terai Region of Nepal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Hao Zhu & Yibin Ao & Hong Xu & Zhongli Zhou & Yan Wang & Linchuan Yang, 2021. "Determinants of Farmers’ Intention of Straw Recycling: A Comparison Analysis Based on Different Pro-Environmental Publicity Modes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-17, October.
    14. Qi Jiang & Jizhi Li & Hongyun Si & Yangyue Su, 2022. "The Impact of the Digital Economy on Agricultural Green Development: Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, July.
    15. Jianying Xiao & Yan Song & Heyuan You, 2020. "Explaining Peasants’ Intention and Behavior of Farmland Trusteeship in China: Implications for Sustainable Agricultural Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-17, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lichi Zhang & Yanyan Jiang & Junmin Wu, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Government and Residents’ Participation in Waste Separation Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Gu, Tianqi & Xu, Weiping & Liang, Hua & He, Qing & Zheng, Nan, 2024. "School bus transport service strategies’ policy-making mechanism – An evolutionary game approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    3. Jialu Li & Meiying Yang & Wei Xing & Xuan Zhao, 2018. "Information Acquisition Behavior: An Evolutionary Game Theory Perspective," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 434-455, June.
    4. Guohui Song & Yongbin Wang, 2021. "Mainstream Value Information Push Strategy on Chinese Aggregation News Platform: Evolution, Modelling and Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Sandholm,W.H., 2003. "Excess payoff dynamics, potential dynamics, and stable games," Working papers 5, Wisconsin Madison - Social Systems.
    6. Hui Yu & Wei Wang & Baohua Yang & Cunfang Li, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Stress Effect of Cross-Regional Transfer of Resource-Exhausted Enterprises," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-16, November.
    7. Hefti, Andreas, 2016. "On the relationship between uniqueness and stability in sum-aggregative, symmetric and general differentiable games," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 83-96.
    8. Yong He & Peng He & Feifei Xu & Chunming (Victor) Shi, 2019. "Sustainable tourism modeling: Pricing decisions and evolutionarily stable strategies for competitive tour operators," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(5), pages 779-799, August.
    9. Shuangming Yin & Yansong Li & Xiaojuan Chen & Woraphon Yamaka & Jianxu Liu, 2024. "Collaborative Digital Governance for Sustainable Rural Development in China: An Evolutionary Game Approach," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, September.
    10. Griffin, Christopher & Mummah, Riley & deForest, Russ, 2021. "A finite population destroys a traveling wave in spatial replicator dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    11. Francesco Squintani & Juuso Valimaki, 1999. "Imitation and Experimentation in a Changing Environment," Discussion Papers 1275, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    12. Qianwen Wu & Qiangqiang Wang & Yongwu Dai, 2023. "Analysis of Strategy Selection in Third-Party Governance of Rural Environmental Pollution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    13. Vinícius Ferraz & Thomas Pitz, 2024. "Analyzing the Impact of Strategic Behavior in an Evolutionary Learning Model Using a Genetic Algorithm," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(2), pages 437-475, February.
    14. Jonathan Newton, 2018. "Evolutionary Game Theory: A Renaissance," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-67, May.
    15. Daniel Friedman & Nirvikar Singh, 2004. "Vengefulness Evolves in Small Groups," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Steffen Huck (ed.), Advances in Understanding Strategic Behaviour, chapter 3, pages 28-54, Palgrave Macmillan.
    16. Vallée, Thomas & YIldIzoglu, Murat, 2009. "Convergence in the finite Cournot oligopoly with social and individual learning," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 670-690, November.
    17. Friedman, Daniel & Singh, Nirvikar, 2004. "Vengefulness Evolves in Small Groups," Santa Cruz Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt0xp29105, Department of Economics, UC Santa Cruz.
    18. Silveira, Douglas & Vasconcelos, Silvinha, 2020. "Essays on duopoly competition with asymmetric firms: Is profit maximization always an evolutionary stable strategy?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    19. Friedman, Daniel & Singh, Nirvikar, 2003. "Negative Reciprocity: The Coevolution of Memes and Genes," Santa Cruz Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt8n49r3t2, Department of Economics, UC Santa Cruz.
    20. Zhao, Dan & Ji, Shou-feng & Wang, He-ping & Jiang, Li-wen, 2021. "How do government subsidies promote new energy vehicle diffusion in the complex network context? A three-stage evolutionary game model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:5:p:647-:d:1391522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.