IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i12p2153-d1540922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Kind of Institutional Configuration Incentivizes Farmers’ Behavior in Ecological Value Co-Creation of Cultivated Land?

Author

Listed:
  • Siyu Zhang

    (School of Public Administration and Policy, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, China
    College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Weiyan Hu

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Li Chen

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
    Nancheng Subdistrict Office, Nanchuan District, Chongqing 408400, China)

  • Yu Zhang

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Liye Wang

    (School of Public Administration and Policy, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, China)

Abstract

Innovating institutional incentives and promoting multiple-subject interaction and cooperation to create ecological value of cultivated land are practical requirements for the sustainable protection of cultivated land and high-quality development of agriculture and rural areas. We performed a survey questionnaire of 862 farmers in the Wuhan Metropolitan Area and used the fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) method to explore the institutional configuration effect of farmers’ behavior in the ecological value co-creation of cultivated land (FBEVCCL). The institutional configuration characteristics of the ecological value co-creation of cultivated land was analyzed, and we propose institutional optimization suggestions for the ecological value co-creation of cultivated land. The research results demonstrated the following: (1) A single institutional element does not constitute a necessary condition for the FBEVCCL, and it is necessary to analyze the institutional configuration effect. (2) Four institutional configurations lead to high-level FBEVCCL. Both formal and informal configurations have important impacts on the FBEVCCL, but the guidance, subsidies, and constraints of formal institutions are often the core driving factors, complemented by the shaping of farmers’ values to jointly enhance the FBEVCCL. The formal institutions of publicity and guidance, rewards and subsidies, and disciplinary constraints can to some extent replace each other. (3) The three institutional configurations lead to low-level FBEVCCL, and the lack of informal and formal institutions for incentives and punishments is the main reason for low-level FBEVCCL. In the future, we should further standardize the reward and punishment mechanism, enhance farmers’ green production skills, and sustainably enhance the behavior of farmers in the ecological value co-creation of cultivated land.

Suggested Citation

  • Siyu Zhang & Weiyan Hu & Li Chen & Yu Zhang & Liye Wang, 2024. "What Kind of Institutional Configuration Incentivizes Farmers’ Behavior in Ecological Value Co-Creation of Cultivated Land?," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2153-:d:1540922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2153/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2153/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiang Luo & Zuo Zhang & Xinhai Lu & Lu Zhang, 2019. "Topographic heterogeneity, rural labour transfer and cultivated land use: An empirical study of plain and low‐hill areas in China," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 98(5), pages 2157-2178, October.
    2. Alpuche Álvarez, Yair Asael & Jepsen, Martin Rudbeck & Müller, Daniel & Rasmussen, Laura Vang & Sun, Zhanli, 2024. "Unraveling the complexity of land use change and path dependency in agri-environmental schemes for small farmers: A serious game approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    3. Siyu Zhang & Weiyan Hu & Jiaojiao Zhang & Mengran Li & Qingying Zhu, 2020. "Mismatches in Suppliers’ and Demanders’ Cognition, Willingness and Behavior with Respect to Ecological Protection of Cultivated Land: Evidence from Caidian District, Wuhan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Nie, Zihan & Yang, Xiaojun & Tu, Qin, 2020. "Resource scarcity and cooperation: Evidence from a gravity irrigation system in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    5. Candel, Melissa & Paulsson, Jenny, 2023. "Enhancing public value with co-creation in public land development: The role of municipalities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    6. Stephen L. Vargo & Robert F. Lusch, 2016. "Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 5-23, January.
    7. Daneshvar Kakhki, Mohammad & Sajadi, Seyed Mojtaba, 2024. "Business analytics affordances for supply chain value creation: A technology-organization-environment perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Finsterwalder, Jörg, 2017. "Refugee influx: Repercussions and research agenda for service scholars," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 177-181.
    2. Krystyna Mazurek-Lopacinska & Magdalena Sobocinska, 2021. "Social Media in Marketing Activities of Enterprises in the Light of the Analysis of Empirical Research Results," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4 - Part ), pages 647-658.
    3. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4b:p:647-658 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Yuxiang Chris Zhao & Jingwen Lian & Yan Zhang & Shijie Song & Xinlin Yao, 2024. "Value co‐creation in cultural heritage information practices: Literature review and future agenda: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(3), pages 298-323, March.
    5. Maria Vincenza Ciasullo & Orlando Troisi & Mara Grimaldi & Daniele Leone, 2020. "Multi-level governance for sustainable innovation in smart communities: an ecosystems approach," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1167-1195, December.
    6. Best, Bernadette & Miller, Kristel & McAdam, Rodney & Maalaoui, Adnane, 2022. "Business model innovation within SPOs: Exploring the antecedents and mechanisms facilitating multi-level value co-creation within a value-network," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 475-494.
    7. Amalesh Sharma & Sourav Bikash Borah & Aditya Christopher Moses, 2024. "Achieving social and economic sustainability through innovations in transformative services: A case of healthcare organizations in an emerging market," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 1366-1390, October.
    8. Christian Bartelheimer, Philipp zur Heiden, Hedda Lüttenberg, Daniel Beverungen, 2021. "Systematizing the Lexicon of Platforms in Information Systems: A Data-Driven Study," Working Papers Dissertations 79, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    9. Severin Oesterle & Arne Buchwald & Nils Urbach, 2022. "Investigating the co-creation of IT consulting service value: empirical findings of a matched pair analysis," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 571-597, June.
    10. Anna Gerke & Herbert Woratschek & Geoff Dickson, 2020. "How is value co-created in a sportbusiness-to-business context?," Post-Print hal-02962015, HAL.
    11. da Silva, Agostinho & Almeida, Isabel, 2020. "Towards INDUSTRY 4.0 | a case STUDY in ornamental stone sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    12. Tommaso Elli & Alessandra Spagnoli & Valeria Maria Iannilli, 2024. "Mapping Service-Based Retailing to Improve Sustainability Practices in the Fashion Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Xiaodong Bai, 2024. "Unveiling the Impact of Value Propositions on Value Creation in Chinese Health Service Enterprises: A Customer Participation Perspective," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 38(1), pages 1-17.
    14. Ponzoa, José M. & Gómez, Andrés & Mas, José M., 2023. "EU27 and USA institutions in the digital ecosystem: Proposal for a digital presence measurement index," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    15. Michael K. Brady & Todd Arnold, 2017. "Organizational service strategy," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 785-788, November.
    16. Shan, Wei & Qiao, Tong & Zhang, Mingli, 2020. "Getting more resources for better performance: The effect of user-owned resources on the value of user-generated content," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    17. Jia, Yibo & Su, Jingqin & Cui, Li & Wu, Lin & Hua Tan, Kim, 2023. "Platform business model innovation in the digitalization era: A “driver-process-result” perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    18. Chan, Haksin & Yang, Morgan X. & Zeng, Kevin J., 2022. "Bolstering ratings and reviews systems on multi-sided platforms: A co-creation perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 208-217.
    19. Trischler, Jakob & Johnson, Mikael & Kristensson, Per, 2020. "A service ecosystem perspective on the diffusion of sustainability-oriented user innovations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 552-560.
    20. Vincenzo Basile & Francesca Loia & Nunzia Capobianco & Roberto Vona, 2023. "An ecosystems perspective on the reconversion of offshore platforms: Towards a multi‐level governance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1615-1631, July.
    21. Francesco Polese & Luca Carrubbo & Francesco Caputo & Debora Sarno, 2018. "Managing Healthcare Service Ecosystems: Abstracting a Sustainability-Based View from Hospitalization at Home (HaH) Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2153-:d:1540922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.