IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i12p2121-d1538587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Objective Urban Green Space Optimization of Wetland Cities Based on the Carbon Balance: A Case Study in Wuhan

Author

Listed:
  • Xu Liu

    (College of Horticulture & Forestry Sciences, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
    College of Horticulture & Forestry Sciences, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China)

  • Zhixiang Zhou

    (College of Horticulture & Forestry Sciences, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
    Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture in Central China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

Urban areas are significant centers of human activity and are recognized as major contributors to global carbon emissions. The establishment of urban green spaces plays a crucial role in enhancing carbon sinks and mitigating carbon emissions, thereby fostering a low-carbon cycle within cities. However, the existing literature on the carbon sequestration of green spaces in Chinese cities often overlooks the role of water bodies, which are a significant characteristic of wetland cities. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the carbon sequestration potential of green spaces in wetland cities, taking into account the contribution of water bodies to carbon sinks. This study aims to analyze the quantitative structure of urban green spaces through the lens of carbon balance, which can effectively enhance a city’s overall carbon sequestration capacity. Utilizing carbon balance theory, this research first assesses the carbon offsetting capability (COC) of urban green spaces in Wuhan for the year 2019. It then forecasts future carbon emissions, sets improvement targets for COC, and calculates the required area of standard green space to achieve these targets by 2030. A multi-objective programming (MOP) model is developed to identify the optimal solution that aligns with urban development planning constraints while maximizing carbon sinks. Lastly, we analyzed the contribution rates of different types of urban green spaces to the total carbon sequestration capacity of green spaces to clarify the characteristics of carbon absorption in green spaces of Wuhan, a wetland city. The findings indicate the following: (1) In 2019, Wuhan’s carbon emissions from human activities reached approximately 38.20 Mt, with urban green spaces absorbing around 5.62 Mt of carbon, and a COC of about 14.71%. (2) Projections for 2030 suggest that carbon emissions in Wuhan will rise to approximately 42.64 Mt. Depending on the targeted COC improvement rates of 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25%, the required values of carbon sequestration will be 6.59 Mt, 6.90 Mt, 7.21 Mt, 7.53 Mt and 7.84 Mt, respectively. (3) The results of the MOP model indicate that the optimal COC for 2030 is projected to be 16.33%, which necessitates a carbon sequestration of 6.97 Mt. (4) Water bodies accounted for 56.23% of the total carbon absorption in green spaces in 2019 and are projected to represent 45.37% in 2030, highlighting the distinctive characteristics of Wuhan as a wetland city in terms of its green space carbon sequestrations. The management and enhancement of water body carbon sequestration capacity is crucial for the carbon sequestration potential of urban green space in Wuhan. The results of this study can provide evidence and recommendations for the low-carbon development patterns of wetland cities across China.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu Liu & Zhixiang Zhou, 2024. "Multi-Objective Urban Green Space Optimization of Wetland Cities Based on the Carbon Balance: A Case Study in Wuhan," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2121-:d:1538587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2121/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2121/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chuai, Xiaowei & Yuan, Ye & Zhang, Xiuying & Guo, Xiaomin & Zhang, Xiaolei & Xie, Fangjian & Zhao, Rongqin & Li, Jianbao, 2019. "Multiangle land use-linked carbon balance examination in Nanjing City, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 305-315.
    2. Alex C Valach & Kuno Kasak & Kyle S Hemes & Tyler L Anthony & Iryna Dronova & Sophie Taddeo & Whendee L Silver & Daphne Szutu & Joseph Verfaillie & Dennis D Baldocchi, 2021. "Productive wetlands restored for carbon sequestration quickly become net CO2 sinks with site-level factors driving uptake variability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Peiyuan Tao & Ye Lin & Xing Wang & Jiayan Li & Chao Ma & Zhenkun Wang & Xinyue Dong & Peng Yao & Ming Shao, 2023. "Optimization of Green Spaces in Plain Urban Areas to Enhance Carbon Sequestration," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jin Wang & Jingren Yu & Manjuan Shen & Shengquan Che, 2024. "Study on the Optimization of Carbon Sequestration in Shanghai’s Urban Artificial Wetlands: The Cases of Shanghai Fish and Dishui Lake," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Li, Shuoshuo & Liu, Yaobin & Wei, Guoen & Bi, Mo & He, Bao-Jie, 2024. "Carbon surplus or carbon deficit under land use transformation in China?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    3. Sana Basheer & Xiuquan Wang & Quan Van Dau & Muhammad Awais & Pelin Kinay & Tianze Pang & Muhammad Qasim Mahmood, 2024. "Quantification of Carbon Flux Patterns in Ecosystems: A Case Study of Prince Edward Island," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, October.
    4. Chuai, Xiaowei & Gao, Runyi & Huang, Xianjin & Lu, Qinli & Zhao, Rongqin, 2021. "The embodied flow of built-up land in China's interregional trade and its implications for regional carbon balance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    5. Jie Su & Bo Zhou & Yuanpei Liao & Chaoshen Wang & Tian Feng, 2022. "Impact Mechanism of the Urban Network on Carbon Emissions in Rapidly Developing Regions: Example of 47 Cities in Southwest China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Yang Chen & Wenze Yue & Xue Liu & Linlin Zhang & Ye’an Chen, 2021. "Multi-Scenario Simulation for the Consequence of Urban Expansion on Carbon Storage: A Comparative Study in Central Asian Republics," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Shurui Gao & Peiyuan Tao & Zhiming Zhao & Xinyue Dong & Jiayan Li & Peng Yao, 2024. "Estimation and Differential Analysis of the Carbon Sink Service Radius of Urban Green Spaces in the Beijing Plain Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-15, February.
    8. Delanie M. Spangler & Anna Christina Tyler & Carmody K. McCalley, 2021. "Effects of Grazer Exclusion on Carbon Cycling in Created Freshwater Wetlands," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Shiguang Shen & Chengcheng Wu & Zhenyu Gai & Chenjing Fan, 2023. "Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Evolution of the Net Carbon Sink Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors at the City Level in Three Major Urban Agglomerations in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-18, January.
    10. Linye Zhu & Mingming Shi & Deqin Fan & Kun Tu & Wenbin Sun, 2023. "Analysis of Changes in Vegetation Carbon Storage and Net Primary Productivity as Influenced by Land-Cover Change in Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Wang, Ying & Zhang, Hongwei & Zhang, Chen & Liu, Cong, 2021. "Is ecological protection and restoration of full-array ecosystems conducive to the carbon balance? A case study of Hubei Province, China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    12. Xiaowei Chuai & Jiqun Wen & Dachang Zhuang & Xiaomin Guo & Ye Yuan & Yue Lu & Mei Zhang & Jiasheng Li, 2019. "Intersection of Physical and Anthropogenic Effects on Land-Use/Land-Cover Changes in Coastal China of Jiangsu Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    13. Hong Jia & Siqi Yang & Lianyou Liu & Hang Li & Zeshi Li & Yixin Chen & Jifu Liu, 2024. "Assessment and Prediction of Carbon Storage Based on Land Use/Land Cover Dynamics in the Gonghe Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Xue Zhang & Xiaodong Yu & Yunxiao Cao & Jiani Yue & Shan Wang & Yunxia Liu, 2024. "The effects of diverse microbial community structures, driven by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation, on carbon release from a paddy field," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(1), pages 48-59.
    15. Xiaomin Guo & Chuanglin Fang, 2021. "Integrated Land Use Change Related Carbon Source/Sink Examination in Jiangsu Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, November.
    16. repec:caa:jnlpse:v:preprint:id:340-2023-pse is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Gao, Runyi & Chuai, Xiaowei & Ge, Jingfeng & Wen, Jiqun & Zhao, Rongqin & Zuo, Tianhui, 2022. "An integrated tele-coupling analysis for requisition–compensation balance and its influence on carbon storage in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    18. Yuxin Fan & Fang Wei, 2022. "Contributions of Natural Carbon Sink Capacity and Carbon Neutrality in the Context of Net-Zero Carbon Cities: A Case Study of Hangzhou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, February.
    19. Yuting Wu & Mengya Luo & Shaogang Ding & Qiyao Han, 2024. "Using a Light Gradient-Boosting Machine–Shapley Additive Explanations Model to Evaluate the Correlation Between Urban Blue–Green Space Landscape Spatial Patterns and Carbon Sequestration," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, November.
    20. Liu, Xin & Wang, Ping & Song, Hang & Zeng, Xiaoying, 2021. "Determinants of net primary productivity: Low-carbon development from the perspective of carbon sequestration," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2121-:d:1538587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.