IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i12p2117-d1538426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

State-and-Evolution Detection Model for Characterizing Farmland Spatial Pattern Variation in Hengyang Using Long Time Series Remote Sensing Product

Author

Listed:
  • Yunong Ma

    (School of Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Shi Cao

    (The Second Surveying and Mapping Institute of Hunan Province, Changsha 410004, China)

  • Xia Lu

    (The Second Surveying and Mapping Institute of Hunan Province, Changsha 410004, China)

  • Jiqing Peng

    (The Second Surveying and Mapping Institute of Hunan Province, Changsha 410004, China)

  • Lina Ping

    (The Second Surveying and Mapping Institute of Hunan Province, Changsha 410004, China)

  • Xiang Fan

    (The Second Surveying and Mapping Institute of Hunan Province, Changsha 410004, China)

  • Xiongwei Guan

    (School of Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xiangnan Liu

    (School of Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Meiling Liu

    (School of Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Analyzing farmland landscape pattern variations induced by human activities can support effective decision making by governments to improve land use efficiency. However, research on long-term and continuous spatial process changes in farmland is scarce, and spatial pattern changes in farmlands remain insufficiently understood. Moreover, studies in which researchers have utilized dynamic process analysis to describe farmlands are relatively limited. This study aimed to apply the state-and-evolution detection model (SEDM), generated from long-term remote sensing data, to characterize farmland spatial pattern variations in Hengyang City, Hunan Province. Annual farmland data from 1990 to 2022, change type samples, and auxiliary data were collected, and six types of spatial pattern variations (perforation, dissection, shrinkage, creation, enlargement, and aggregation) were defined for the study area. Subsequently, the SEDM was applied based on four landscape indices. Finally, spatiotemporal evolution features, namely evolution times, evolution duration, and dominant evolution pattern, were quantified. The farmland in the study area exhibited a generally upward trend with fluctuations. The maximum area was followed by shrinkage (S), perforation (P), and enlargement (E). In over 70% of the study area, fewer than three evolution times occurred over three decades. The dominant evolution patterns were P–S, S–P, and E–P for single evolution events, and P–S–P, S–P–S, and P–S–S for double events. The model achieved an overall accuracy of 85%, thus demonstrating its effectiveness in characterizing landscape pattern variations and providing valuable insights for researchers and policy makers to develop strategies for farmland protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunong Ma & Shi Cao & Xia Lu & Jiqing Peng & Lina Ping & Xiang Fan & Xiongwei Guan & Xiangnan Liu & Meiling Liu, 2024. "State-and-Evolution Detection Model for Characterizing Farmland Spatial Pattern Variation in Hengyang Using Long Time Series Remote Sensing Product," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2117-:d:1538426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2117/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2117/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuzhu Zou & Zhenshan Liu & Yan Chen & Yin Wang & Shijing Feng, 2024. "Crop Rotation and Diversification in China: Enhancing Sustainable Agriculture and Resilience," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Ciaian, Pavel & Rajcaniova, Miroslava & Guri, Fatmir & Zhllima, Edvin & Shahu, Edmira, 2018. "The impact of crop rotation and land fragmentation on farm productivity in Albania," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 120(3), December.
    3. Siqin Tong & Gang Bao & Ah Rong & Xiaojun Huang & Yongbin Bao & Yuhai Bao, 2020. "Comparison of the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Land Use Changes in Four Municipalities of China Based on Intensity Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiahao Zhai & Chiwei Xiao & Zhiming Feng & Ying Liu, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Land-Use Changes and Conflicts between Cropland and Forest in the Mekong River Basin during 1990–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Xiaofang Sun & Chao Yu & Junbang Wang & Meng Wang, 2020. "The Intensity Analysis of Production Living Ecological Land in Shandong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Wei Xu & Yuqi Miao & Shuaimeng Zhu & Jimin Cheng & Jingwei Jin, 2023. "Modelling the Geographical Distribution Pattern of Apple Trees on the Loess Plateau, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Yang Wang & Remina Shataer & Tingting Xia & Xueer Chang & Hui Zhen & Zhi Li, 2021. "Evaluation on the Change Characteristics of Ecosystem Service Function in the Northern Xinjiang Based on Land Use Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Fengqiang Wu & Caijian Mo & Xiaojun Dai, 2022. "Analysis of the Driving Force of Land Use Change Based on Geographic Detection and Simulation of Future Land Use Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Jiaxi Li & Changyuan Li & Chenyang Liu & Hailong Ge & Zheneng Hu & Zhuoya Zhang & Xueqiong Tang, 2023. "Analysis of the Coupling Coordination and Obstacle Factors between Sustainable Development and Ecosystem Service Value in Yunnan Province, China: A Perspective Based on the Production-Living-Ecologica," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.
    7. Dadirai Matarira & Onisimo Mutanga & Maheshvari Naidu & Terence Darlington Mushore & Marco Vizzari, 2023. "Characterizing Informal Settlement Dynamics Using Google Earth Engine and Intensity Analysis in Durban Metropolitan Area, South Africa: Linking Pattern to Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Xianhui Hu & Xiaxia Lin & Gaohui Wen & Yi Zhou & Hao Zhou & Siqi Lin & Dongyang Yue, 2024. "The Impact of Cultivated Land Fragmentation on Farmers’ Ecological Efficiency of Cultivated Land Use Based on the Moderating and Mediating Effects of the Cultivated Land Management Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Shukun Wang & Dengwang Li & Tingting Li & Changquan Liu, 2021. "Land Use Transitions and Farm Performance in China: A Perspective of Land Fragmentation," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-22, July.
    10. Pierre Damien Ntihinyurwa & Walter Timo de Vries, 2021. "Farmland Fragmentation, Farmland Consolidation and Food Security: Relationships, Research Lapses and Future Perspectives," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-39, January.
    11. Rui Zhang & Guoming Du & Bonoua Faye & Haijiao Liu, 2025. "Analysis of Farmers’ Crop Rotation Intention and Behavior Using Structural Equation Modeling: Evidence from Heilongjiang Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Shuping Fan & Peng Li & Qi He & Jiaru Cheng & Mingfeng Zhang & Nan Wu & Song Yang & Shidong Pan, 2022. "Study on the Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Land Use Ecosystem Service Value and Its Zoning Management and Control in the Typical Alpine Valley Area of Southeast Tibet—Empirical Analysis Based on Panel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    13. Ntihinyurwa, Pierre Damien & de Vries, Walter Timo, 2021. "Farmland fragmentation concourse: Analysis of scenarios and research gaps," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    14. Raluca Georgiana Robu & Ana-Maria Holobiuc & Alina Petronela Alexoaei & Valentin Cojanu & Dumitru Miron, 2023. "Regional Patterns of Pesticide Consumption Determinants in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    15. Chunfang Zhou & Yuluan Zhao & Mingshun Long & Xiubin Li, 2024. "How Does Land Fragmentation Affect Agricultural Technical Efficiency? Based on Mediation Effects Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2117-:d:1538426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.