IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i11p1799-d1511245.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach for Urban Water Features: Ecological Landscape Architecture Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Reyhaneh Hashemi Sigari

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran 1983969411, Iran)

  • Thomas Panagopoulos

    (Research Centre of Tourism Sustainability and Well-Being, Campus de Gambelas, University of Algarve, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal)

Abstract

In recent decades, the issues of ecology and environmental sustainability have become a global concern in contemporary urban design. Among various urban elements, water features play a significant role in improving the ecological characteristics of their surrounding environment, especially in hot and arid areas. The aim of this study is to evaluate the ecological characteristics of urban water features comprehensively and quantitatively, which has been overlooked in previous studies, taking their physical characteristics into account. To this end, a multicriteria decision-making method, an analytic network process, was proposed to quantitatively evaluate the ecological characteristics of water features. In this approach, four ecological criteria—microclimate, biodiversity, greenery, and human wellbeing—and ten physical characteristics of water features were considered. Twenty-one experts were asked to complete a questionnaire for pairwise comparisons of all ecological criteria and the influence of physical characteristics. The results showed that vegetation and scale, with the relative influencing values of 0.255 and 0.188, respectively, were identified as the most decisive features influencing ecological criteria. Conversely, texture, with a value 0.023, had the least impact. Moreover, it was shown that water features have the greatest impact on the microclimate compared with other ecological criteria. The results were used to compare water features at the Koohsangi Transregional Park, located in a hot and arid city of Iran. The results of this study lead to a framework that can help urban designers integrate ecological criteria into water feature planning to enhance urban ecology and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Reyhaneh Hashemi Sigari & Thomas Panagopoulos, 2024. "A Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach for Urban Water Features: Ecological Landscape Architecture Evaluation," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1799-:d:1511245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1799/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1799/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ebun Akinsete & Stella Apostolaki & Nikos Chatzistamoulou & Phoebe Koundouri & Stella Tsani, 2019. "The Link between Ecosystem Services and Human Wellbeing in the Implementation of the European Water Framework Directive: Assessing Four River Basins in Europe," DEOS Working Papers 1911, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    2. Francisco Tomatis & Monika Egerer & Adriana Correa-Guimaraes & Luis Manuel Navas-Gracia, 2023. "Urban Gardening in a Changing Climate: A Review of Effects, Responses and Adaptation Capacities for Cities," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Saeid Teshnehdel & Elisa Gatto & Dongying Li & Robert D. Brown, 2022. "Improving Outdoor Thermal Comfort in a Steppe Climate: Effect of Water and Trees in an Urban Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Xinhong Cai & Dawei Xu, 2021. "Application of Edge Computing Technology in Hydrological Spatial Analysis and Ecological Planning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Marie Luise Blau & Frieder Luz & Thomas Panagopoulos, 2018. "Urban River Recovery Inspired by Nature-Based Solutions and Biophilic Design in Albufeira, Portugal," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Melih Bozkurt & Helen Woolley & Nicola Dempsey, 2019. "Children’s interactions with water in city centres: a case study from Sheffield, UK," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6), pages 671-687, August.
    7. Karol Langie & Kinga Rybak-Niedziółka & Věra Hubačíková, 2022. "Principles of Designing Water Elements in Urban Public Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-12, June.
    8. Silva, Marcos Dornelas Freitas Machado e & Calijuri, Maria Lúcia & Sales, Francisco José Ferreira de & Souza, Mauro Henrique Batalha de & Lopes, Lucas Sampaio, 2014. "Integration of technologies and alternative sources of water and energy to promote the sustainability of urban landscapes," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 71-81.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahla Tayefi Nasrabadi, 2022. "How do nature-based solutions contribute to urban landscape sustainability?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 576-591, January.
    2. Misagh Mottaghi & Maria Kylin & Sandra Kopljar & Catharina Sternudd, 2021. "Blue-Green Playscapes: Exploring Children’s Places in Stormwater Spaces in Augustenborg, Malmö," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 175-188.
    3. Richard Smardon, 2020. "Thomas Panagopoulos. Landscape urbanism and green infrastructure," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(2), pages 208-209, June.
    4. Sanja Gašparović & Ana Sopina & Anton Zeneral, 2022. "Impacts of Zagreb’s Urban Development on Dynamic Changes in Stream Landscapes from Mid-Twentieth Century," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    5. Nikos Chatzistamoulou & Phoebe Koundouri, 2020. "The Economics of Sustainable Development," DEOS Working Papers 2005, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    6. Stella Tsani & Phoebe Koundouri & Ebun Akinsete, 2020. "Resource management and sustainable development: A review of the European water policies in accordance with the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals," DEOS Working Papers 2036, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    7. Ying Zheng & Qiyao Han & Greg Keeffe, 2024. "An Evaluation of Different Landscape Design Scenarios to Improve Outdoor Thermal Comfort in Shenzhen," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, January.
    8. Henrique Sala Benites & Paul Osmond & Deo Prasad, 2022. "A Future-Proof Built Environment through Regenerative and Circular Lenses—Delphi Approach for Criteria Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-33, December.
    9. Isabella Tamine Parra Miranda & Juliana Moletta & Bruno Pedroso & Luiz Alberto Pilatti & Claudia Tania Picinin, 2021. "A Review on Green Technology Practices at BRICS Countries: Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    10. Zhang, Da & Huang, Qingxu & He, Chunyang & Wu, Jianguo, 2017. "Impacts of urban expansion on ecosystem services in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration, China: A scenario analysis based on the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 115-130.
    11. Mengmeng Cui & Filipa Ferreira & Tze Kwan Fung & José Saldanha Matos, 2021. "Tale of Two Cities: How Nature-Based Solutions Help Create Adaptive and Resilient Urban Water Management Practices in Singapore and Lisbon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-22, September.
    12. Fumiko Ikemoto & Kosuke Sakura & Adrián Torres Astaburuaga, 2021. "The Influence of Historical Irrigation Canals on Urban Morphology in Valencia, Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-28, July.
    13. Helena Carla B. Pimentel & Ana Paula M. de Lima & Agnieszka E. Latawiec, 2024. "Recommendations for Implementing Therapeutic Gardens to Enhance Human Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-17, October.
    14. Monika Jutrović & Dora Tomić Reljić & Monika Zovko & Marina Bubalo Kovačić & Petra Pereković & Monika Kamenečki, 2023. "Potential for Applying Nature-Based Solutions to Urban Waterways: The Case Study of Medveščak and Črnomerec Streams in the City of Zagreb, Croatia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, June.
    15. Wu, Tian & Zhou, Wei & Yan, Xiaoyu & Ou, Xunmin, 2016. "Optimal policy design for photovoltaic power industry with positive externality in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 22-30.
    16. Chamizo-Gonzalez, Julián & Cano-Montero, Elisa Isabel & Muñoz-Colomina, Clara Isabel, 2016. "Municipal Solid Waste Management services and its funding in Spain," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 65-72.
    17. Marie Luise Blau & Thomas Panagopoulos, 2022. "Designing Healing Destinations: A Practical Guide for Eco-Conscious Tourism Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, September.
    18. Thomas Panagopoulos, 2019. "Special Issue: Landscape Urbanism and Green Infrastructure," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-4, July.
    19. Nikos Chatzistamoulou & Phoebe Koundouri, 2020. "SDGs Patterns Across the Globe: From Theory to Practice," DEOS Working Papers 2016, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    20. Peterson, Eric Laurentius, 2016. "Transcontinental assessment of secure rainwater harvesting systems across Australia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 33-47.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1799-:d:1511245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.