IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i10p1648-d1495104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploration of the Technologies Application Experience of Landscape-Scale Green Infrastructure by the Conservation Fund

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoqi Yang

    (Graduate School of Horticulture, Chiba University, Matsudo 271-8510, Japan)

  • Qian Wang

    (Graduate School of Horticulture, Chiba University, Matsudo 271-8510, Japan)

  • Yifan Chen

    (Graduate School of Science and Technology, Keio University, Yokohama 223-8521, Japan)

  • Takeshi Kinoshita

    (Graduate School of Horticulture, Chiba University, Matsudo 271-8510, Japan)

Abstract

As the earliest discussed concept of Green Infrastructure (GI), Landscape-scale GI, in the form of an ecological network capable of balancing development and conservation, has received widespread attention. Its multifunctionality is one of the important features. However, the lack of information and funding, weakness of management authority and technical support make the practice of Landscape-scale GI challenging. Compared to GI adapted in stormwater management, which has comprehensive guidance from theory to practical technologies by officials during its introduction and promotion in other countries, Landscape-scale GI, despite a rich theoretical research foundation, is often overlooked due to insufficient summary research on practical techniques. To address this gap, this study uses mixed methods research to comprehensively analyze 27 Landscape-scale GI practical projects led by the Conservation Fund over the past 20 years to explore patterns in their technical applications. Through qualitative analysis, we standardized and classified descriptive information for these 27 projects and, combined with statistical analysis, clarified the practice development trends committed to balancing development and conservation. The quantitative analysis concentrated on the corresponding relationships between technical applications and project objectives, and GI functions. Based on this, the study categorized the technologies used, summarizing core technologies applicable to most Landscape-scale GI practices, providing some support for the promotion of Landscape-scale GI.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoqi Yang & Qian Wang & Yifan Chen & Takeshi Kinoshita, 2024. "Exploration of the Technologies Application Experience of Landscape-Scale Green Infrastructure by the Conservation Fund," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-30, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:10:p:1648-:d:1495104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/10/1648/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/10/1648/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yasser Jezzini & Ghiwa Assaf & Rayan H. Assaad, 2023. "Models and Methods for Quantifying the Environmental, Economic, and Social Benefits and Challenges of Green Infrastructure: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-40, May.
    2. A. Marissa Matsler & Thaddeus R. Miller & Peter M. Groffman, 2021. "The Eco-Techno Spectrum: Exploring Knowledge Systems’ Challenges in Green Infrastructure Management," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 49-62.
    3. Jun Ying & Xiaojing Zhang & Yiqi Zhang & Svitlana Bilan, 2022. "Green infrastructure: systematic literature review," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 343-366, December.
    4. Jannes J. Willems & Astrid Molenveld & William Voorberg & Geert Brinkman, 2020. "Diverging Ambitions and Instruments for Citizen Participation across Different Stages in Green Infrastructure Projects," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 22-32.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghiwa Assaf & Rayan H. Assaad, 2023. "Optimal Preventive Maintenance, Repair, and Replacement Program for Catch Basins to Reduce Urban Flooding: Integrating Agent-Based Modeling and Monte Carlo Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, May.
    2. Haochen Qian & Fan Zhang & Bing Qiu, 2023. "Deciphering the Evolution, Frontier, and Knowledge Clustering in Sustainable City Planning: A 60-Year Interdisciplinary Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Saura, Jose Ramon & Ribeiro-Navarrete, Samuel & Palacios-Marqués, Daniel & Mardani, Abbas, 2023. "Impact of extreme weather in production economics: Extracting evidence from user-generated content," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    4. Erin N. Rivers & Jennifer L. Morse, 2022. "Variability of Potential Soil Nitrogen Cycling Rates in Stormwater Bioretention Facilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Yan Han & Yuehui Liang, 2023. "Scientific Knowledge Map Study of Therapeutic Landscapes and Community Open Spaces: Visual Analysis with CiteSpace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Hisham Elkadi & Mahsa Seifhashemi & Rachel Lauwerijssen, 2024. "Thermographic Analysis of Green Wall and Green Roof Plant Types under Levels of Water Stress," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Jiao Zhang & Danqing Li & Shuguang Ning & Katsunori Furuya, 2023. "Sustainable Urban Green Blue Space (UGBS) and Public Participation: Integrating Multisensory Landscape Perception from Online Reviews," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-29, July.
    8. Laurentiu Nicolae Pricope & Valentin Marian Antohi & Alina Meca & Angela Buboi (Danaila) & Costinela Fortea & Monica Laura Zlati, 2024. "The New European Development Scoreboard for SDG11 at the European Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Eleanor Chapman & Viktor Bukovszki & Martina van Lierop & Silvia Tomasi & Stephan Pauleit, 2024. "Towards More Equitable Urban Greening: A Framework for Monitoring and Evaluating Co-Governance," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9.
    10. Paul Osmond & Sara Wilkinson, 2021. "City Planning and Green Infrastructure: Embedding Ecology into Urban Decision-Making," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 1-4.
    11. Saleh Qanazi & Ihab H. Hijazi & Isam Shahrour & Rani El Meouche, 2024. "Exploring Urban Service Location Suitability: Mapping Social Behavior Dynamics with Space Syntax Theory," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Afonso Celso Vanoni de Castro & Angélica Tanus Benatti Alvim, 2024. "Sustainable Urbanization in Valley-Bottom Areas in Urban Settings: The Case of the Jaguaré Stream Basin, São Paulo, Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:10:p:1648-:d:1495104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.