IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i8p1628-d1220251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Short-Term Effect of Different Inputs of Organic Amendments from Olive Oil Industry By-Products on Soil Organic Carbon and Physical Properties

Author

Listed:
  • Nadia Vignozzi

    (CREA-AA—Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria, Centro di Ricerca Agricoltura e Ambiente, Via Lanciola 12/A, 50125 Firenze, Italy)

  • Maria Costanza Andrenelli

    (CREA-AA—Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria, Centro di Ricerca Agricoltura e Ambiente, Via Lanciola 12/A, 50125 Firenze, Italy)

  • Alessandro Elio Agnelli

    (CREA-AA—Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria, Centro di Ricerca Agricoltura e Ambiente, Via Lanciola 12/A, 50125 Firenze, Italy)

  • Angelo Fiore

    (CREA-AA—Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria, Centro di Ricerca Agricoltura e Ambiente, Via Celso Ulpiani 5, 70125 Bari, Italy)

  • Sergio Pellegrini

    (CREA-AA—Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria, Centro di Ricerca Agricoltura e Ambiente, Via Lanciola 12/A, 50125 Firenze, Italy)

Abstract

Maintaining adequate levels of soil organic matter in Mediterranean agro-ecosystems is a pressing need due to the increasing evidence of climate change. The use of by-products of the olive oil industry as organic amendments could contribute to this goal. We report the results of a 2-year research carried out in southern Italy on a clay loam soil for evaluating the effects of different olive oil industry by-products on soil organic carbon and other related soil characteristics. The treatments were: (i) Olive mill wastewater (OMW), (ii) compost from olive pomace (CP1), (iii) compost from olive pomace in double quantity (CP2), and (iv) organo-mineral fertilizer (OMF). Soil samples, collected at a depth of 0–20 cm, were analyzed for total organic carbon (TOC), its extractable (TEC) and humic fractions (HC), and aggregate stability (Ist). In addition, soil macroporosity, water retention, and penetration resistance (PR) were evaluated. CP1 induced the largest increase in soil TOC, TEC, and HC content, and a significant improvement in Ist; the addition of a large quantity of organic carbon (CP2) did not determine a proportional increase in soil organic matter content. The aggregate stability of the CP2 was the lowest; nevertheless, the characterization of macroporosity indicated an improvement of soil structure functionality. With respect to control (OMF), OMW had a significant decrease in Ist and an increase in PR of the uppermost soil layer.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadia Vignozzi & Maria Costanza Andrenelli & Alessandro Elio Agnelli & Angelo Fiore & Sergio Pellegrini, 2023. "Short-Term Effect of Different Inputs of Organic Amendments from Olive Oil Industry By-Products on Soil Organic Carbon and Physical Properties," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:8:p:1628-:d:1220251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/8/1628/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/8/1628/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zema, Demetrio Antonio & Esteban Lucas-Borja, Manuel & Andiloro, Serafina & Tamburino, Vincenzo & Zimbone, Santo Marcello, 2019. "Short-term effects of olive mill wastewater application on the hydrological and physico-chemical properties of a loamy soil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 312-321.
    2. Márcio R. Nunes & Douglas L. Karlen & Thomas B. Moorman, 2020. "Tillage Intensity Effects on Soil Structure Indicators—A US Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Parascanu, M.M. & Puig Gamero, M. & Sánchez, P. & Soreanu, G. & Valverde, J.L. & Sanchez-Silva, L., 2018. "Life cycle assessment of olive pomace valorisation through pyrolysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 589-601.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zang, Guiyan & Zhang, Jianan & Jia, Junxi & Lora, Electo Silva & Ratner, Albert, 2020. "Life cycle assessment of power-generation systems based on biomass integrated gasification combined cycles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 336-346.
    2. Yun Wu & Hui Wang & Jinbin Zhu, 2022. "Influence of Reclaimed Water Quality on Infiltration Characteristics of Typical Subtropical Zone Soils: A Case Study in South China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Beatriz Ruiz-Carrasco & Lázuli Fernández-Lobato & Yaiza López-Sánchez & David Vera, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of Olive Oil Production in Turkey, a Territory with an Intensive Production Project," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Ramos, João S. & Ferreira, Ana F., 2022. "Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of olive and wine industry co-products valorisation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    5. Rui Zhao & Kening Wu & Xiaoliang Li & Nan Gao & Mingming Yu, 2021. "Discussion on the Unified Survey and Evaluation of Cultivated Land Quality at County Scale for China’s 3rd National Land Survey: A Case Study of Wen County, Henan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-26, February.
    6. Bombino, Giuseppe & Andiloro, Serafina & Folino, Adele & Lucas-Borja, Manuel Esteban & Zema, Demetrio Antonio, 2021. "Short-term effects of olive oil mill wastewater application on soil water repellency," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    7. Muhammad Shaukat & Ashfaq Ahmad & Tasneem Khaliq & Aaron Kinyu Hoshide & Daniel C. de Abreu, 2023. "Organic Amendments and Reduced Tillage Accelerate Harvestable C Biomass and Soil C Sequestration in Rice–Wheat Rotation in a Semi-Arid Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:8:p:1628-:d:1220251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.