IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i8p1608-d1217499.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Urban Commercial Land Use Intensification Based on Land Parcels: Taking Wuxi City as an Example

Author

Listed:
  • Haocong Wang

    (Faculty of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
    Land and Water Division (NSL), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 00153 Rome, Italy)

  • Kening Wu

    (Faculty of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Zhe Feng

    (Faculty of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Huafu Zhao

    (Faculty of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Hua Ai

    (Land Intensive Utilization Center, China Land Surveying and Planning Institute, Beijing 100035, China)

  • Chao Meng

    (Land Intensive Utilization Center, China Land Surveying and Planning Institute, Beijing 100035, China)

Abstract

Intensive land use assessment is a key research topic in urban land use, and most of the existing studies focus on macro-level assessment. There is a lack of research on the micro-level assessment of intensive urban land use, especially at the parcel level. The objective of this research is to propose a method for the parcel-based evaluation of urban commercial land intensification. The study uses a multidimensional evaluation framework and index system, comprehensive evaluation, and spatially exploratory analysis of urban commercial intensive land use based on “building intensity, use efficiency, compatibility, and diversity”. The study finds that (1) the average value of intensive use of urban commercial land is 13.01, the standard deviation is 5.11, and the median value is 13, which generally indicate a medium level. (2) The degree of intensive use of commercial land has obvious characteristics of a high, medium, and low level. The study shows that when evaluating the degree of land use intensification at the parcel level, it is also necessary to consider the influence of the compatibility and diversity of external land use. The research results can provide a basis for spatial planning and the optimal design of urban land resources to improve urban vitality.

Suggested Citation

  • Haocong Wang & Kening Wu & Zhe Feng & Huafu Zhao & Hua Ai & Chao Meng, 2023. "Evaluation of Urban Commercial Land Use Intensification Based on Land Parcels: Taking Wuxi City as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:8:p:1608-:d:1217499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/8/1608/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/8/1608/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark R. Stevens, 2017. "Does Compact Development Make People Drive Less?," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(1), pages 7-18, January.
    2. Yizhou Wu & Peilei Fan & Heyuan You, 2018. "Spatial Evolution of Producer Service Sectors and Its Influencing Factors in Cities: A Case Study of Hangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, March.
    3. Liangliang Zhou & Yishao Shi & Xiangyang Cao, 2019. "Evaluation of Land Intensive Use in Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Irwin, Elena G. & Bockstael, Nancy E., 2004. "Land use externalities, open space preservation, and urban sprawl," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 705-725, November.
    5. Xufeng Cui & Sisi Huang & Cuicui Liu & Tingting Zhou & Ling Shan & Fengyuan Zhang & Min Chen & Fei Li & Walter T. de Vries, 2021. "Applying SBM-GPA Model to Explore Urban Land Use Efficiency Considering Ecological Development in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Wang, Liye & Zhang, Siyu & Tang, Lanping & Lu, Yanchi & Liu, Yanfang & Liu, Yaolin, 2022. "Optimizing distribution of urban land on the basis of urban land use intensity at prefectural city scale in mainland China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    7. Xiaoteng Cen & Cifang Wu & Xiaoshi Xing & Ming Fang & Zhuoma Garang & Yizhou Wu, 2015. "Coupling Intensive Land Use and Landscape Ecological Security for Urban Sustainability: An Integrated Socioeconomic Data and Spatial Metrics Analysis in Hangzhou City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-24, January.
    8. Rafał Blazy & Rita Łabuz, 2022. "Spatial Distribution and Land Development Parameters of Shopping Centers Based on GIS Analysis: A Case Study on Kraków, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, June.
    9. Miller, John S. & Hoel, Lester A., 2002. "The "smart growth" debate: best practices for urban transportation planning," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 1-24, March.
    10. Mark R. Stevens, 2017. "Response to Commentaries on “Does Compact Development Make People Drive Less?”," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(2), pages 151-158, April.
    11. Qian Qian & Haiyan Liu & Xinqi Zheng, 2019. "A Regional Sustainable Intensive Land Use Evaluation Based on Ecological Constraints: A Case Study in Jinan City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, March.
    12. Gabriel, Steven A. & Faria, Jose A. & Moglen, Glenn E., 2006. "A multiobjective optimization approach to smart growth in land development," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 212-248, September.
    13. Hannah Kosow & Sandra Wassermann & Stephan Bartke & Paul Goede & Detlef Grimski & Ines Imbert & Till Jenssen & Oliver Laukel & Matthias Proske & Jochen Protzer & Kim Philip Schumacher & Stefan Siedent, 2022. "Addressing Goal Conflicts: New Policy Mixes for Commercial Land Use Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-26, May.
    14. Zhuoma Garang & Cifang Wu & Guan Li & Yuefei Zhuo & Zhongguo Xu, 2021. "Spatio-Temporal Non-Stationarity and Its Influencing Factors of Commercial Land Price: A Case Study of Hangzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-27, March.
    15. Hui Li & Kunqiu Chen & Lei Yan & Yulin Zhu & Liuwen Liao & Yangle Chen, 2021. "Urban Land Use Transitions and the Economic Spatial Spillovers of Central Cities in China’s Urban Agglomerations," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-27, June.
    16. Wang, Xiaoxiao & Shi, Ruiting & Zhou, Ying, 2020. "Dynamics of urban sprawl and sustainable development in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    17. Esfandi, Saeed & Nourian, Farshad, 2021. "Urban carrying capacity assessment framework for mega mall development. A case study of Tehran’s 22 municipal districts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    18. Hee Jin Yang & Jihoon Song & Mack Joong Choi, 2016. "Measuring the Externality Effects of Commercial Land Use on Residential Land Value: A Case Study of Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-15, April.
    19. Zhiheng Yang & Shaoxing Li & Dongqi Sun & Chenxi Li & Jiahui Wu, 2022. "Intensive Evaluation and High-Quality Redevelopment of Enterprise Land Use: A Case Study in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanxi Lei & Zuoji Dong & Jichang Dong & Zhi Dong, 2023. "Multidimensional Evaluation of Urban Land-Use Efficiency and Innovation Capability Analysis: A Case Study in the Pearl River Delta Region, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Ping Zhang & Xiaojuan Yang & Hua Chen & Sidong Zhao, 2023. "Matching Relationship between Urban Service Industry Land Expansion and Economy Growth in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-29, May.
    3. Yiqun Shang & Dongya Liu & Yi Chen, 2022. "Evaluation of Urban Intensive Land Use Degree with GEE Support: A Case Study in the Pearl River Delta Region, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Chetan Doddamani & M. Manoj, 2023. "Analysis of the influences of built environment measures on household car and motorcycle ownership decisions in Hubli-Dharwad cities," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 205-243, February.
    5. Carozzi, Felipe & Roth, Sefi, 2023. "Dirty density: Air quality and the density of American cities," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    6. Mouratidis, Kostas & Ettema, Dick & Næss, Petter, 2019. "Urban form, travel behavior, and travel satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 306-320.
    7. Miotti, Marco & Needell, Zachary A. & Jain, Rishee K., 2023. "The impact of urban form on daily mobility demand and energy use: Evidence from the United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 339(C).
    8. Bartzokas-Tsiompras, Alexandros & Bakogiannis, Efthimios & Nikitas, Alexandros, 2023. "Global microscale walkability ratings and rankings: A novel composite indicator for 59 European city centres," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    9. Li, Xiaomeng & Neal, Zachary P., 2022. "Are larger cities more central in urban networks: A meta-analysis," OSF Preprints y3s69, Center for Open Science.
    10. Næss, Petter & Peters, Sebastian & Stefansdottir, Harpa & Strand, Arvid, 2018. "Causality, not just correlation: Residential location, transport rationales and travel behavior across metropolitan contexts," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 181-195.
    11. Lin, Tao & Wang, Donggen & Guan, Xiaodong, 2017. "The built environment, travel attitude, and travel behavior: Residential self-selection or residential determination?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 111-122.
    12. Faizeh Hatami & Jean-Claude Thill, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evaluation of the Built Environment’s Impact on Commuting Duration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Ding, Chuan & Cao, Xinyu (Jason) & Næss, Petter, 2018. "Applying gradient boosting decision trees to examine non-linear effects of the built environment on driving distance in Oslo," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 107-117.
    14. Bindong Sun & Rui Guo & Chun Yin, 2023. "Inequity on suburban campuses: University students disadvantaged in self‐improvement travel," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 404-420, June.
    15. Zhao, Juanjuan & Ren, Huan & Gu, Yan & Pan, Haojie, 2023. "Relationships between the residential environment, travel attitude and behaviour among knowledge workers: The role of job types," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    16. David Jung-Hwi Lee & Jean-Michel Guldmann, 2023. "Optimal Regional Allocation of Future Population and Employment under Urban Boundary and Density Constraints: A Spatial Interaction Modeling Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-33, February.
    17. Chun Yin & Bindong Sun, 2020. "Does Compact Built Environment Help to Reduce Obesity? Influence of Population Density on Waist–Hip Ratio in Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Laviolette, Jérôme & Morency, Catherine & Waygood, E.O.D., 2022. "A kilometer or a mile? Does buffer size matter when it comes to car ownership?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    19. Gao, Jiong & Ma, Shoufeng & Zou, Hongyang & Du, Huibin, 2023. "How does population agglomeration influence the adoption of new energy vehicles? Evidence from 290 cities in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    20. Guan, Xiaodong & Wang, Donggen, 2019. "Influences of the built environment on travel: A household-based perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 710-724.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:8:p:1608-:d:1217499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.