IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i6p1196-d1165837.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Study on the Mismatch Phenomenon in Utilizing Urban Land Resources in China

Author

Listed:
  • Liyin Shen

    (School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China
    School of Spatial Planning and Design, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou 310015, China)

  • Lingyu Zhang

    (School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China)

  • Haijun Bao

    (School of Spatial Planning and Design, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou 310015, China)

  • Siuwai Wong

    (Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China)

  • Xiaoyun Du

    (School of Management Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Xiaoxuan Wei

    (School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China)

Abstract

Effective land use contributes to sustainable urban development. However, there are various reports suggesting that urban land resources used mismatch to different extents in many Chinese cities. This study measures the degree of the mismatch phenomenon in utilizing urban land resources from a supply–demand perspective, and a mismatching coefficient, namely land resource mismatch (LRM), is adopted as the measurement. The data used for the empirical analysis are from a sample of 35 cities in China. The empirical study shows the effectiveness of employing the mismatching coefficient LRM model in evaluating the degree of the mismatch phenomenon in utilizing urban land resources. The research findings suggest the following: (1) Overall, the mismatch phenomenon in utilizing urban land resources is significant in China in the form of either supply shortage or over-supply. (2) The degree of the mismatch phenomenon is different between different types of land, with the land for administration and public services showing more serious mismatching and the land for commercial and business facilities showing less mismatching. (3) There are significant differences both in the type and the degree of land use mismatch among different cities, which are contributed largely by the intensity of local government’s controlling and planning role on land resources and the maturity of applying market mechanisms. The results from this study can inform the government of the importance and necessity of adopting effective policy measures for mitigating the mismatch phenomenon in utilizing urban land resources. The research method applied in this study can be applied in a larger context internationally for understanding the effectiveness of utilizing urban land resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Liyin Shen & Lingyu Zhang & Haijun Bao & Siuwai Wong & Xiaoyun Du & Xiaoxuan Wei, 2023. "An Empirical Study on the Mismatch Phenomenon in Utilizing Urban Land Resources in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-29, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:1196-:d:1165837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/6/1196/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/6/1196/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chang-Tai Hsieh & Enrico Moretti, 2019. "Housing Constraints and Spatial Misallocation," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(2), pages 1-39, April.
    2. Sun, Wenwen & Jin, Hongyu & Chen, Yan & Hu, Xin & Li, Zhuoran & Kidd, Akari & Liu, Chunlu, 2021. "Spatial mismatch analyses of school land in China using a spatial statistical approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    3. Yang, Guo-liang & Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Chen, Kun, 2019. "Investigating the regional sustainable performance of the Chinese real estate industry: A slack-based DEA approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 141-159.
    4. Aidong Zhao & Jinsheng Huang & Fugang Gao & Hao Meng & Chong Peng, 2023. "Regional allocation of industrial land in industrializing China: does spatial mismatch exist?," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(3), pages 396-411, April.
    5. Biitir, Samuel B. & Nara, Baslyd B. & Ameyaw, Stephen, 2017. "Integrating decentralised land administration systems with traditional land governance institutions in Ghana: Policy and praxis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 402-414.
    6. Song, Yang & Yeung, Godfrey & Zhu, Daolin & Xu, Yang & Zhang, Lixin, 2022. "Efficiency of urban land use in China’s resource-based cities, 2000–2018," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    7. Elena Batunova & Maria Gunko, 2018. "Urban shrinkage: an unspoken challenge of spatial planning in Russian small and medium-sized cities," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(8), pages 1580-1597, August.
    8. Xin Zhang & Jinghu Pan, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Pattern and Driving Factors of Urban Sprawl in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Xie, Rui & Yao, Siling & Han, Feng & Zhang, Qi, 2022. "Does misallocation of land resources reduce urban green total factor productivity? An analysis of city-level panel data in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    10. Shen, Liyin & Cheng, Guangyu & Du, Xiaoyun & Meng, Conghui & Ren, Yitian & Wang, Jinhuan, 2022. "Can urban agglomeration bring “1 + 1 > 2Effect”? A perspective of land resource carrying capacity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    11. Virgiliu Midrigan & Daniel Yi Xu, 2014. "Finance and Misallocation: Evidence from Plant-Level Data," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(2), pages 422-458, February.
    12. Zhang, Chao & Anadon, Laura Diaz, 2014. "A multi-regional input–output analysis of domestic virtual water trade and provincial water footprint in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 159-172.
    13. Wei Wang & Zihao Zhou & Jun Chen & Wen Cheng & Jian Chen, 2021. "Analysis of Location Selection of Public Service Facilities Based on Urban Land Accessibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-20, January.
    14. Wu, Yuzhe & Shan, Jiaming & Choguill, Charles L., 2021. "Combining behavioral interventions with market forces in the implementation of land use planning in China: A theoretical framework embedded with nudge," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xinyu Shan & Zihan Li & Xinyi Shao & Xinyi Wang & Zhe Feng & Kening Wu, 2024. "How Do Population Changes and Land Use Policies Affect the Relationship between the Urban Economy and Public Services?," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laiqun Jin & Xiuyan Liu & Sam Hak Kan Tang, 2021. "High-Technology Zones, Misallocation of Resources among Cities and Aggregate Productivity: Evidence from China," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 21-11, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    2. Li, Xiaolu & Ma, Lin & Tang, Yang, 2024. "Migration and resource misallocation in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    3. Chang-Tai Hsieh & Enrico Moretti, 2019. "Housing Constraints and Spatial Misallocation," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(2), pages 1-39, April.
    4. Zheng Li & Jorge Martinez-Vazquez, 2018. "Fiscal Decentralization and Interregional Capital Misallocation: Evidence from China," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper1816, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    5. Chen, Guowen & Herrera, Ana María & Lugauer, Steven, 2022. "Policy and misallocation: Evidence from Chinese firm-level data," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    6. Wenqin Gong & Yu Kong, 2022. "Nonlinear Influence of Chinese Real Estate Development on Environmental Pollution: New Evidence from Spatial Econometric Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Ehsan Qasemipour & Farhad Tarahomi & Markus Pahlow & Seyed Saeed Malek Sadati & Ali Abbasi, 2020. "Assessment of Virtual Water Flows in Iran Using a Multi-Regional Input-Output Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Xu Yang & Xuan Zou & Xueqi Liu & Qixuan Li & Siqian Zou & Ming Li, 2023. "The Spatiotemporal Pattern and Driving Mechanism of Urban Sprawl in China’s Counties," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Sylvain Catherine & Thomas Chaney & Zongbo Huang & David Sraer & David Thesmar, 2022. "Quantifying Reduced‐Form Evidence on Collateral Constraints," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(4), pages 2143-2181, August.
    10. Guangyao Deng & Liujuan Wang & Yanan Song, 2015. "Effect of Variation of Water-Use Efficiency on Structure of Virtual Water Trade - Analysis Based on Input–Output Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(8), pages 2947-2965, June.
    11. Sergio Ocampo & Juan Herreño, 2023. "The Macroeconomic Consequences of Subsistence Self-Employment," University of Western Ontario, Departmental Research Report Series 20231, University of Western Ontario, Department of Economics.
    12. Joel M. David & Venky Venkateswaran, 2019. "The Sources of Capital Misallocation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(7), pages 2531-2567, July.
    13. Kohn, David & Leibovici, Fernando & Szkup, Michal, 2020. "Financial frictions and export dynamics in large devaluations," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    14. Trenczek, Jan & Wacker, Konstantin M., 2023. "Human Capital Misallocation and Output per Worker Differences: Beyond Cobb-Douglas," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1331, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    15. Jin, Laiqun & Dai, Jiaying & Jiang, Weijie & Cao, Kairui, 2023. "Digital finance and misallocation of resources among firms: Evidence from China," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    16. Carsten Eckel & Florian Unger, 2023. "Credit Constraints, Endogenous Innovations, And Price Setting In International Trade," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 64(4), pages 1715-1747, November.
    17. Kucukvar, Murat & Haider, Muhammad Ali & Onat, Nuri Cihat, 2017. "Exploring the material footprints of national electricity production scenarios until 2050: The case for Turkey and UK," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 251-263.
    18. Alam, M. Jahangir, 2020. "Capital misallocation: Cyclicality and sources," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    19. Nicholas Kacher & Luke Petach, 2021. "Boon or Burden? Evaluating the Competing Effects of House-Price Shocks on Regional Entrepreneurship," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 35(4), pages 287-304, November.
    20. Chen, Cheng & Senga, Tatsuro & Sun, Chang & Zhang, Hongyong, 2023. "Uncertainty, imperfect information, and expectation formation over the firm’s life cycle," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 60-77.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:1196-:d:1165837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.