IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i4p854-d1119380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the Impacts of Built-Up Land Allocation on Carbon Emissions in 88 Cities of the Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on Panel Regressions

Author

Listed:
  • Jiayu Liu

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Feng Xu

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Key Laboratory of Law and Governance, Ministry of Natural Resources, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Huan Wang

    (School of Economics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China)

  • Xiao Zhang

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

The supply of built-up land determines the depths of human activities, leading to the differences in scale and intensity of carbon emissions. However, the relationship between the composition of built-up land and carbon emissions has not been fully investigated. In response, this study collects the panel data of 88 cities along the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China, and uses the fixed effect model and system GMM model, to explore the impacts of specific subtypes of built-up land on carbon emissions averaged by economic output and urban land. The findings show that industrial land and commercial land are the main contributors to increase carbon emissions; the increased proportions of land subtypes related to supporting facilities and infrastructures show significant restraining effects; carbon emission was a dynamic process with time-lagged effects. As a result, reallocating the structure of urban built-up land can directly and indirectly adjust the intensity of carbon emissions. Policy recommendations focus on the balanced supplies of production and ecological land.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiayu Liu & Feng Xu & Huan Wang & Xiao Zhang, 2023. "Investigating the Impacts of Built-Up Land Allocation on Carbon Emissions in 88 Cities of the Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on Panel Regressions," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:854-:d:1119380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/4/854/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/4/854/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jianghua Liu & Mengxu Li & Yitao Ding, 2021. "Econometric analysis of the impact of the urban population size on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 18186-18203, December.
    2. Mi, Zhifu & Zhang, Yunkun & Guan, Dabo & Shan, Yuli & Liu, Zhu & Cong, Ronggang & Yuan, Xiao-Chen & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2016. "Consumption-based emission accounting for Chinese cities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1073-1081.
    3. Arellano, Manuel & Bover, Olympia, 1995. "Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 29-51, July.
    4. Wang, Shaojian & Fang, Chuanglin & Wang, Yang, 2016. "Spatiotemporal variations of energy-related CO2 emissions in China and its influencing factors: An empirical analysis based on provincial panel data," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 505-515.
    5. Aihui Ma & Yaya He & Peng Tang, 2021. "Understanding the Impact of Land Resource Misallocation on Carbon Emissions in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Chuanzhun Sun & Chao Sun & Zhenshan Yang & Jikang Zhang & Yu Deng, 2016. "Urban Land Development for Industrial and Commercial Use: A Case Study of Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Dongyang Xiao & Haipeng Niu & Jin Guo & Suxia Zhao & Liangxin Fan, 2021. "Carbon Storage Change Analysis and Emission Reduction Suggestions under Land Use Transition: A Case Study of Henan Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Andrée, Bo Pieter Johannes & Chamorro, Andres & Spencer, Phoebe & Koomen, Eric & Dogo, Harun, 2019. "Revisiting the relation between economic growth and the environment; a global assessment of deforestation, pollution and carbon emission," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Xiao Zhang & Meng Li & Qiao Li & Yanan Wang & Wei Chen, 2021. "Spatial Threshold Effect of Industrial Land Use Efficiency on Industrial Carbon Emissions: A Case Study in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Thomas Wiedmann & Guangwu Chen & Anne Owen & Manfred Lenzen & Michael Doust & John Barrett & Kristian Steele, 2021. "Three‐scope carbon emission inventories of global cities," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(3), pages 735-750, June.
    11. Ahn, Seung C. & Gadarowski, Christopher, 2004. "Small sample properties of the GMM specification test based on the Hansen-Jagannathan distance," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 109-132, January.
    12. Zhou, Di & Huang, Qing & Chong, Zhaohui, 2022. "Analysis on the effect and mechanism of land misallocation on carbon emissions efficiency: Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    13. Feng Han & Min Huang, 2022. "Land Misallocation and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-30, July.
    14. Liu, Xiaoping & Ou, Jinpei & Chen, Yimin & Wang, Shaojian & Li, Xia & Jiao, Limin & Liu, Yaolin, 2019. "Scenario simulation of urban energy-related CO2 emissions by coupling the socioeconomic factors and spatial structures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1163-1178.
    15. Hussain, Jafar & Lee, Chien-Chiang & Chen, Yongxiu, 2022. "Optimal green technology investment and emission reduction in emissions generating companies under the support of green bond and subsidy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rauf, Abdul & Zhang, Jin & Li, Jinkai & Amin, Waqas, 2018. "Structural changes, energy consumption and carbon emissions in China: Empirical evidence from ARDL bound testing model," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 194-206.
    2. Liu, Qianqian & Wang, Shaojian & Zhang, Wenzhong & Li, Jiaming & Kong, Yunlong, 2019. "Examining the effects of income inequality on CO2 emissions: Evidence from non-spatial and spatial perspectives," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 163-171.
    3. Caravaggio, Nicola, 2020. "A global empirical re-assessment of the Environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Yuxin Liu & Chenjing Fan & Dongdong Xue, 2024. "A Review of the Effects of Urban and Green Space Forms on the Carbon Budget Using a Landscape Sustainability Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-29, February.
    5. Shangui Peng & Jian Wang & Hao Sun & Zhengning Guo, 2022. "How Does the Spatial Misallocation of Land Resources Affect Urban Industrial Transformation and Upgrading? Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Caravaggio, Nicola, 2020. "Economic growth and the forest development path: A theoretical re-assessment of the environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    7. Zhang, Jinning & Wang, Jianlong & Yang, Xiaodong & Ren, Siyu & Ran, Qiying & Hao, Yu, 2021. "Does local government competition aggravate haze pollution? A new perspective of factor market distortion," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    8. Horim Kim & Jaeyoung Kim & Kyungmyung Jang & Jaemin Han, 2020. "Are the Blockchain-Based Patents Sustainable for Increasing Firm Value?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, February.
    9. Kılkış, Şiir, 2022. "Urban emissions and land use efficiency scenarios towards effective climate mitigation in urban systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    10. Zhao, Jun & Jiang, Qingzhe & Dong, Xiucheng & Dong, Kangyin, 2020. "Would environmental regulation improve the greenhouse gas benefits of natural gas use? A Chinese case study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    11. Wen, Jun & Yin, Hua-Tang & Jang, Chyi-Lu & Uchida, Hideaki & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2023. "Does corruption hurt green innovation? Yes – Global evidence from cross-validation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    12. Yue‐Jun Zhang & Wei Shi & Lin Jiang, 2020. "Does China's carbon emissions trading policy improve the technology innovation of relevant enterprises?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 872-885, March.
    13. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Hussain, Jafar, 2023. "An assessment of socioeconomic indicators and energy consumption by considering green financing," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    14. LAWSON, Laté A. & MARTINO, Roberto & NGUYEN-VAN, Phu, 2020. "Environmental convergence and environmental Kuznets curve: A unified empirical framework," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 437(C).
    15. Nicolae Stef & Sami Ben Jabeur, 2023. "Elections and Environmental Quality," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(2), pages 593-625, February.
    16. Feng, Chao & Huang, Jian-Bai & Wang, Miao, 2018. "The driving forces and potential mitigation of energy-related CO2 emissions in China's metal industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 487-494.
    17. Nguyen, Canh Phuc & Su, Thanh Dinh, 2021. "Alleviating energy poverty for forest conservation: It seems to work, but what are we missing?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    18. Yumeng Mao & Xuemei Li, 2023. "A Review of Research on the Impact Mechanisms of Green Development in the Transportation Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-26, December.
    19. Yue, Wencong & Li, Yangqing & Su, Meirong & Chen, Qionghong & Rong, Qiangqiang, 2023. "Carbon emissions accounting and prediction in urban agglomerations from multiple perspectives of production, consumption and income," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    20. Daniel Ştefan Armeanu & Georgeta Vintilă & Ştefan Cristian Gherghina, 2017. "Empirical Study towards the Drivers of Sustainable Economic Growth in EU-28 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:854-:d:1119380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.