IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i4p778-d1111076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Evolution of the Waterfront Utilization and Sustainable Development of the Container Ports in the Yangtze River: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta

Author

Listed:
  • Weichen Liu

    (Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
    Key Laboratory of Watershed Geographic Sciences, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China)

  • Weixiao Chen

    (Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
    Key Laboratory of Watershed Geographic Sciences, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China)

  • Youhui Cao

    (Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
    Key Laboratory of Watershed Geographic Sciences, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China)

Abstract

Waterfront resources are an important support system for the social and economic development within the region along the Yangtze River. Container ports are an important component of the Yangtze River port system, as well as for the growth point of waterfront utilization. Based on the summary of remote sensing images and relevant data, this paper calculates the waterfront utilization of the container ports along the Yangtze River in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), analyzes the waterfront organization pattern and change characteristics, and puts forward the enlightenment and countermeasures for the sustainable development of the port waterfronts. Extending the study of port resources from coastal areas to inland areas is an academic contribution of this paper. At the same time, it has practical significance for the high-quality development of port and shipping and the development and protection of land resources along the Yangtze River. In the YRD, the waterfront utilization of container ports has increased along the Yangtze River, showing a decrease from downstream to upwards, and it has formed dense zones attached to the central cities and major manufacturing bases. The ports with higher length of waterfront are mostly located in the shipping central cities and the Yangtze River estuary. The development direction of container ports is large-scale and specialized. The utilization of the container port waterfront is approaching the periphery of the city and areas with convenient transportation. The utilization of container port shorelines will be close to the periphery of the city and convenient transportation areas. The container port waterfronts occupy the ecological reserve, and the conflicts are expanding with the development of shipping, mainly distributed in the Yangtze River estuary. Based on the empirical analysis, this paper puts forward four enlightenments. First, the exploitation and utilization of the port waterfront has experienced multiple stages of “exploitation—conflict—mitigation”. With the transformation of productive waterfront utilization, the pattern of sustainable development along the Yangtze River has changed. Secondly, the conflict between waterfront utilization and protection is inevitable. Additionally, it is necessary to face up to the temporary rapid rise of encroachment on the reserve. Third, through the horizontal coordination of the port system along the river, the original focus on the hub cities will be transferred to the comprehensive consideration of the port cities in the whole region, and the waterfront load of different types of container ports can be balanced. Fourth, the Yangtze River Delta integration mechanism can solve the barriers between higher and lower levels or between different departments and cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Weichen Liu & Weixiao Chen & Youhui Cao, 2023. "The Evolution of the Waterfront Utilization and Sustainable Development of the Container Ports in the Yangtze River: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:778-:d:1111076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/4/778/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/4/778/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lang Xu & Fengjue Xie & Chuanxu Wang, 2022. "Passive or proactive capacity sharing? A perspective of cooperation and competition between two regional ports," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 492-509, May.
    2. Violeta Roso & Kent Lumsden, 2010. "A review of dry ports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 12(2), pages 196-213, June.
    3. Sanchez Rodrigues, Vasco & Beresford, Anthony & Pettit, Stephen & Bhattacharya, Syamantak & Harris, Irina, 2014. "Assessing the cost and CO2e impacts of rerouteing UK import containers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 53-67.
    4. César Ducruet & Sung-Woo Lee, 2006. "Frontline soldiers of globalisation : Port-city evolution and regional competition," Post-Print hal-03246480, HAL.
    5. Veenstra, Albert & Notteboom, Theo, 2011. "The development of the Yangtze River container port system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 772-781.
    6. Ng, Koi Yu Adolf & Gujar, Girish C., 2009. "The spatial characteristics of inland transport hubs: evidences from Southern India," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 346-356.
    7. Woodburn, Allan, 2013. "Effects of rail network enhancement on port hinterland container activity: a United Kingdom case study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 162-169.
    8. Lupi, Marino & Farina, Alessandro & Orsi, Denise & Pratelli, Antonio, 2017. "The capability of Motorways of the Sea of being competitive against road transport. The case of the Italian mainland and Sicily," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 9-21.
    9. Thill, Jean-Claude & Lim, Hyunwoo, 2010. "Intermodal containerized shipping in foreign trade and regional accessibility advantages," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 530-547.
    10. Theo E. Notteboom * & Jean-Paul Rodrigue, 2005. "Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 297-313, July.
    11. Bask, Anu & Roso, Violeta & Andersson, Dan & Hämäläinen, Erkki, 2014. "Development of seaport–dry port dyads: two cases from Northern Europe," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 85-95.
    12. Iannone, Fedele, 2012. "The private and social cost efficiency of port hinterland container distribution through a regional logistics system," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1424-1448.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Weichen & Cao, Youhui & Chen, Jianglong & Guo, Jiaying & Liang, Shuangbo, 2023. "Organization of river-sea container transportation in the Yangtze River: Processes and mechanisms," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    2. Wu, Zhen & Woo, Su-Han & Lai, Po-Lin & Chen, Xiaoyi, 2022. "The economic impact of inland ports on regional development: Evidence from the Yangtze River region," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 80-91.
    3. Koi Yu Adolf Ng & César Ducruet, 2014. "The changing tides of port geography (1950–2012)," Post-Print halshs-01359160, HAL.
    4. Yang, Dong & Notteboom, Theo & Zhou, Xin, 2021. "Spatial, temporal and institutional characteristics of entry strategies in inland container terminals: A comparison between Yangtze River and Rhine River," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. Witte, Patrick & Wiegmans, Bart & Ng, Adolf K.Y., 2019. "A critical review on the evolution and development of inland port research," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 53-61.
    6. Erica Varese & Danilo Stefano Marigo & Mariarosaria Lombardi, 2020. "Dry Port: A Review on Concept, Classification, Functionalities and Technological Processes," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Tsao, Yu-Chung & Thanh, Vo-Van, 2019. "A multi-objective mixed robust possibilistic flexible programming approach for sustainable seaport-dry port network design under an uncertain environment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 13-39.
    8. Yang, Jinglei & Luo, Meifeng & Ji, Abing, 2016. "Analyzing the spatial–temporal evolution of a gateway’s hinterland: A case study of Shanghai, China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 355-367.
    9. Dadashpoor, Hashem & Arasteh, Mojtaba, 2020. "Core-port connectivity: Towards shaping a national hinterland in a West Asia country," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 57-68.
    10. Halim, Ronald A. & Kwakkel, Jan H. & Tavasszy, Lóránt A., 2016. "A strategic model of port-hinterland freight distribution networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 368-384.
    11. Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Padilha, Flavio & Pallis, Athanasios A., 2013. "Institutions, bureaucratic and logistical roles of dry ports: the Brazilian experiences," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 46-55.
    12. Santos, Tiago A. & Guedes Soares, C., 2017. "Development dynamics of the Portuguese range as a multi-port gateway system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 178-188.
    13. Alena Khaslavskaya & Violeta Roso, 2020. "Dry ports: research outcomes, trends, and future implications," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(2), pages 265-292, June.
    14. Alena Khaslavskaya & Violeta Roso, 2019. "Outcome-Driven Supply Chain Perspective on Dry Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, March.
    15. Sdoukopoulos, Eleftherios & Boile, Maria, 2020. "Port-hinterland concept evolution: A critical review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    16. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2012. "Giving a direction to port regionalisation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1551-1561.
    17. Monios, Jason, 2011. "The role of inland terminal development in the hinterland access strategies of Spanish ports," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 59-66.
    18. Yoon, Junghyun & Lee, Hee Yong & Dinwoodie, John, 2015. "Competitiveness of container terminal operating companies in South Korea and the industry–university–government network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-14.
    19. Bottasso, Anna & Conti, Maurizio & Ferrari, Claudio & Tei, Alessio, 2014. "Ports and regional development: A spatial analysis on a panel of European regions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 44-55.
    20. Zhao, Qianyu & Xu, Hang & Wall, Ronald S & Stavropoulos, Spyridon, 2017. "Building a bridge between port and city: Improving the urban competitiveness of port cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 120-133.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:778-:d:1111076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.