IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i2p389-d1052978.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Natural Resources Conflicts on Borderlands by the Five Spheres of Earth System

Author

Listed:
  • Hansol Lee

    (Asian Forest Cooperation Organization, Seoul 07236, Republic of Korea)

  • Jeongeun Son

    (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology and Institutes of Green Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University, 1447 Pyeongchang-daero, Daehwa, Pyeongchang 25354, Republic of Korea)

  • Suyeon Min

    (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology and Institutes of Green Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University, 1447 Pyeongchang-daero, Daehwa, Pyeongchang 25354, Republic of Korea)

  • Haeun Lee

    (Korean Engineering Consultants Corporation, Seoul 05288, Republic of Korea)

  • Mi Sun Park

    (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology and Institutes of Green Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University, 1447 Pyeongchang-daero, Daehwa, Pyeongchang 25354, Republic of Korea
    Institute for Peace and Unification Studies, Seoul National University, 173 Seouldaehak-ro, Siheung 15011, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Border regions face challenges managing natural resources, which include forests, wildlife, air, and rivers. This study aims to provide an overview of research on various natural resource conflicts and cooperation in borderlands worldwide, considering the five spheres of the Earth system, namely the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The type, scope, and place of natural resource conflicts in the borderlands were examined and key findings for clarifying the conflicts, cooperation, and geographical characteristics were derived using a systematic review methodology. The results indicate that over the last two decades, the conflicts over the hydrosphere are the most dominant. In the following order, conflicts over the biosphere have been frequently dealt with in transboundary areas. In Africa, dams (the anthroposphere) related to the hydrosphere especially influence and cause conflicts as well as cooperation for benefit-sharing among riparian countries. In North America, governance along the transboundary areas has been developed. “In Asia, several neighboring countries are linked through various types of associations ranging from multilateral organizations to sub-national administrations in order to effectively manage the long and wide-ranging natural resources that exist beyond the borders of the countries”. In Europe, numerous protected areas related to the biosphere have been designated. Therefore, this research helps better understand transboundary conflicts based on natural resources and could contribute to designing natural resource management strategies or models in borderlands.

Suggested Citation

  • Hansol Lee & Jeongeun Son & Suyeon Min & Haeun Lee & Mi Sun Park, 2023. "Natural Resources Conflicts on Borderlands by the Five Spheres of Earth System," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-24, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:389-:d:1052978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/389/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/389/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paula Hanasz, 2017. "A Little Less Conversation? Track II Dialogue and Transboundary Water Governance," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(2), pages 296-309, May.
    2. Nhamo, Luxon & Ndlela, B. & Nhemachena, Charles & Mabhaudhi, T. & Mpandeli, S. & Matchaya, Greenwell, 2018. "The water-energy-food nexus: climate risks and opportunities in southern Africa," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 10(5):1-18..
    3. Kelly, J. Andrew & Vollebergh, Herman R.J., 2012. "Adaptive Policy Mechanisms for Transboundary Air Pollution Regulation: Reasons and Recommendations," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 128198, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    4. Paula Hanasz, 2017. "A Little Less Conversation? Track II Dialogue and Transboundary Water Governance," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies 201722, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    5. Muhammad Tousif Bhatti & Muhammad Ashraf & Arif A. Anwar, 2021. "Soil Erosion and Sediment Load Management Strategies for Sustainable Irrigation in Arid Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Leandra Merz & Di Yang & Vanessa Hull, 2020. "A Metacoupling Framework for Exploring Transboundary Watershed Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Frauke Urban & Giuseppina Siciliano & Johan Nordensvard, 2018. "China’s dam-builders: their role in transboundary river management in South-East Asia," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 747-770, September.
    8. Zhiqiang Zhao & Meng Cai & Thomas Connor & Min Gon Chung & Jianguo Liu, 2020. "Metacoupled Tourism and Wildlife Translocations Affect Synergies and Trade-Offs among Sustainable Development Goals across Spillover Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    9. Bhatti, Muhammad Tousif & Ashraf, M. & Anwar, Arif A., 2021. "Soil erosion and sediment load management strategies for sustainable irrigation in arid regions," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 1-13(6):354.
    10. Sjöstedt, Martin & Linell, Amanda, 2021. "Cooperation and coercion: The quest for quasi-voluntary compliance in the governance of African commons," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    11. Naomi Moswete & Brijesh Thapa & William K. Darley, 2020. "Local Communities’ Attitudes and Support Towards the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park in Southwest Botswana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Forsyth, Tim, 2014. "Public concerns about transboundary haze: a comparison of Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 56043, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Anthony Lima & Dongkyu Kim & Andrew M. Song & Gordon M. Hickey & Owen Temby, 2019. "Trust and Influence in the Gulf of Mexico’s Fishery Public Management Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-23, November.
    14. Sam Bateman, 2017. "Building Cooperation for Managing the South China Sea Without Strategic Trust," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(2), pages 251-259, May.
    15. Laura Norman & Nita Tallent-Halsell & William Labiosa & Matt Weber & Amy McCoy & Katie Hirschboeck & James Callegary & Charles Van Riper & Floyd Gray, 2010. "Developing an Ecosystem Services Online Decision Support Tool to Assess the Impacts of Climate Change and Urban Growth in the Santa Cruz Watershed; Where We Live, Work, and Play," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(7), pages 1-26, July.
    16. Scott R. Stephenson, 2018. "Confronting Borders in the Arctic," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 183-190, April.
    17. Sam Bateman, 2017. "Building Cooperation for Managing the South China Sea Without Strategic Trust," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies 201718, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    18. Hussam Hussein & Mattia Grandi, 2017. "Dynamic political contexts and power asymmetries: the cases of the Blue Nile and the Yarmouk Rivers," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 795-814, December.
    19. Kirstin I. Conti & Joyeeta Gupta, 2016. "Global governance principles for the sustainable development of groundwater resources," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 16(6), pages 849-871, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naho Mirumachi & Margot Hurlbert, 2022. "Reflecting on twenty years of international agreements concerning water governance: insights and key learning," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 317-332, June.
    2. Zhuangzhuang Zhang & Ruihong Yu, 2023. "Assessment of Soil Erosion from an Ungauged Small Watershed and Its Effect on Lake Ulansuhai, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Alina Kulczyk-Dynowska & Agnieszka Stacherzak, 2022. "The Impact of a City on Its Environment: The Prism of Demography and Selected Environmental and Technical Aspects Based on the Case of Major Lower Silesian Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Joyeeta Gupta & Aarti Gupta & Courtney Vegelin, 2022. "Equity, justice and the SDGs: lessons learnt from two decades of INEA scholarship," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 393-409, June.
    5. Drakou, E.G. & Crossman, N.D. & Willemen, L. & Burkhard, B. & Palomo, I. & Maes, J. & Peedell, S., 2015. "A visualization and data-sharing tool for ecosystem service maps: Lessons learnt, challenges and the way forward," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 134-140.
    6. Carmenta, Rachel & Cammelli, Federico & Dressler, Wolfram & Verbicaro, Camila & Zaehringer, Julie G., 2021. "Between a rock and a hard place: The burdens of uncontrolled fire for smallholders across the tropics," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    7. Agni Kalfagianni & Oran R. Young, 2022. "The politics of multilateral environmental agreements lessons from 20 years of INEA," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 245-262, June.
    8. Nicolás Ruiz, Néstor & Suárez Alonso, María Luisa & Vidal-Abarca, María Rosario, 2021. "Contributions of dry rivers to human well-being: A global review for future research," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    9. Kim, Yeon-Su & Rodrigues, Marcos & Robinne, François-Nicolas, 2021. "Economic drivers of global fire activity: A critical review using the DPSIR framework," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    10. Stephanie M. Sabbagh & Gordon M. Hickey, 2019. "Social Factors Affecting Sustainable Shark Conservation and Management in Belize," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Sjöstedt, Martin & Sundström, Aksel & Jagers, Sverker C. & Ntuli, Herbert, 2022. "Governance through community policing: What makes citizens report poaching of wildlife to state officials?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    12. Laura McKinney & Devin C. Wright, 2021. "Climate Change and Water Dynamics in Rural Uganda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-12, July.
    13. Naidoo, Dhesigen & Nhamo, Luxon & Mpandeli, Sylvester & Sobratee, Nafisa & Senzanje, Aidan & Liphadzi, Stanley & Slotow, Rob & Jacobson, Michael & Modi, Albert T. & Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe, 2021. "Operationalising the water-energy-food nexus through the theory of change," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    14. Joel O. Botai & Christina M. Botai & Katlego P. Ncongwane & Sylvester Mpandeli & Luxon Nhamo & Muthoni Masinde & Abiodun M. Adeola & Michael G. Mengistu & Henerica Tazvinga & Miriam D. Murambadoro & S, 2021. "A Review of the Water–Energy–Food Nexus Research in Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    15. Anni Arumsari Fitriany & Piotr J. Flatau & Khoirunurrofik Khoirunurrofik & Nelly Florida Riama, 2021. "Assessment on the Use of Meteorological and Social Media Information for Forest Fire Detection and Prediction in Riau, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-13, October.
    16. Laura M. Norman & Miguel L. Villarreal & Rewati Niraula & Mark Haberstich & Natalie R. Wilson, 2019. "Modelling Development of Riparian Ranchlands Using Ecosystem Services at the Aravaipa Watershed, SE Arizona," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-21, April.
    17. Shijin Wang & Guirong Ji & Zhaolian Hu & Fangdao Qiu, 2022. "Research on the Spatial Correlation of China’s Haze Pollution and the Government’s Cooperative Governance Competitive Strategy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Weber, Matthew A. & Meixner, Thomas & Stromberg, Juliet C., 2016. "Valuing instream-related services of wastewater," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(PA), pages 59-71.
    19. Mohamed Elhag & Silvena Boteva, 2020. "Quantitative Analysis of Different Environmental Factor Impacts on Land Cover in Nisos Elafonisos, Crete, Greece," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-17, September.
    20. Priyanka Mallick, 2022. "Transboundary River Cooperation in Mekong Basin: A Sub-regional Perspective," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 9(1), pages 50-71, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:389-:d:1052978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.