IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i2p356-d1049344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contrasting Response of Mountain Plant-Pollinator Network to Fragmented Semi-Natural Grasslands

Author

Listed:
  • Francesca Della Rocca

    (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 9, 27100 Pavia, Italy)

  • Arianna Tagliani

    (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 9, 27100 Pavia, Italy)

  • Pietro Milanesi

    (Swiss Ornithological Institute, Seerose 1, 6204 Sempach, Switzerland)

  • Matteo Barcella

    (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 9, 27100 Pavia, Italy)

  • Silvia Paola Assini

    (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 9, 27100 Pavia, Italy)

Abstract

The majority of the world’s plants rely on animal pollinators for reproduction, making pollination a key ecosystem service for the maintenance of natural and cultivated plant communities. Mutual interactions between plants and pollinators, also called “plant-pollinator networks”, are becoming increasingly vulnerable due to the intensification of anthropogenic land use and climate change. Thus, due to the rapid decline of semi-natural grasslands in the Northern Apennines (Italy), we aimed at understanding how the fragmentation of these habitats, the spatial distribution, and the amount of semi- and natural areas surrounding them, could affect species diversity and plant-pollinator networks. Specifically, in the Northern Apennines, we monitored semi-natural grasslands belonging to the EU habitat type 6510 to evaluate the effect of fragmentation on plant and pollinator richness and on the plant-pollinator network. We carried out generalized linear models considering three taxonomical and six network descriptors as response variables and the combinations of grasslands size and isolation, as well as 10 other factors describing landscape composition as explanatory variables. We found a well-structured plant-pollinator network, characterized by a high diversity of both plants and pollinators, with mutual relations marginally specialized, highly affected by habitat fragmentation and the land use of surrounding grasslands. Moreover, large and neighboring patches increased pollinator richness and improved the overall network structure while the occurrence of meadows and shrubs around fragmented patches was important to ensure the continuity of floristic resources. Finally, extensive croplands and agricultural settlements significantly reduced plant and pollinator diversity, favoring generalist (probably invasive) species, which however increased the strength and stability of the network.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesca Della Rocca & Arianna Tagliani & Pietro Milanesi & Matteo Barcella & Silvia Paola Assini, 2023. "Contrasting Response of Mountain Plant-Pollinator Network to Fragmented Semi-Natural Grasslands," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:356-:d:1049344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/356/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/356/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susan Kalisz & Donna W. Vogler & Kristen M. Hanley, 2004. "Context-dependent autonomous self-fertilization yields reproductive assurance and mixed mating," Nature, Nature, vol. 430(7002), pages 884-887, August.
    2. Jason M. Tylianakis & Teja Tscharntke & Owen T. Lewis, 2007. "Habitat modification alters the structure of tropical host–parasitoid food webs," Nature, Nature, vol. 445(7124), pages 202-205, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. Mohd-Azlan & S. Conway & T. J. P. Travers & M. J. Lawes, 2023. "The Filtering Effect of Oil Palm Plantations on Potential Insect Pollinator Assemblages from Remnant Forest Patches," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Zhang, Yufei & Bian, Zhenxing & Wang, Shuai & Guo, Xiaoyu & Zhou, Wei, 2024. "Effect of agricultural landscape pattern on the qualitative food web of epigaeic arthropods in low hilly areas of northern China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 488(C).
    3. Jordan, Crispin Y., 2015. "The influence of pleiotropy between viability and pollen fates on mating system evolution," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 7-17.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:356-:d:1049344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.