IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2022i1p9-d1009290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Writ of Amparo and Indigenous Consultation as Instruments to Enforce Inclusive Land Management in San Andrés Cholula, Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Melissa Schumacher

    (Department of Architecture, Universidad de las Américas Puebla, Cholula 72810, Mexico)

  • María Guizar Villalvazo

    (Department of Architecture, Universidad de las Américas Puebla, Cholula 72810, Mexico)

  • Anne Kristiina Kurjenoja

    (Department of Architecture, Universidad de las Américas Puebla, Cholula 72810, Mexico)

  • Pamela Durán-Díaz

    (Chair of Land Management, Department of Aerospace and Geodesy, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany)

Abstract

In 2019, residents of the rural district of San Rafael Comac in the municipality of San Andrés Cholula, Mexico, challenged the implementation of the 2018 Municipal Program for Sustainable Urban Development of San Andrés Cholula (MPSUD), a rapacious urban-planning policy that was negatively affecting ancestral communities— pueblos originarios —and their lands and traditions. In 2020, a legal instrument called the writ of amparo was proven effective in ordering the repeal of the MPSUD and demanding an Indigenous consultation, based on the argument of self-recognition of local and Indigenous identity. Such identity would grant them the specific land rights contained in the Mexican Constitution and in international treaties. To explain their Indigenous identity in the writ of amparo , they referred to an established ancient socio-spatial system of organization that functioned beyond administrative boundaries: the Mesoamerican altepetl system. The altepetl , consisting of the union between land and people, is appointed in the writ of amparo as the foundation of their current form of socio-spatial organization. This paper is a land-policy review of the MPSUD and the writ of amparo , with a case-study approach for San Rafael Comac, based on a literature review. The research concludes that Indigenous consultation is a key tool and action for empowerment towards responsible land-management in a context where private urban-development impinges on traditional land uses and customs, and could be beneficial for traditional communities in Mexico and other Latin American countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Melissa Schumacher & María Guizar Villalvazo & Anne Kristiina Kurjenoja & Pamela Durán-Díaz, 2022. "The Writ of Amparo and Indigenous Consultation as Instruments to Enforce Inclusive Land Management in San Andrés Cholula, Mexico," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:9-:d:1009290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/9/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/9/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pamela Durán-Díaz & Adriana Armenta-Ramírez & Anne Kristiina Kurjenoja & Melissa Schumacher, 2020. "Community Development through the Empowerment of Indigenous Women in Cuetzalan Del Progreso, Mexico," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Eduardo Gutiérrez Juárez & Anne Kristiina Kurjenoja & Melissa Schumacher & María Guizar Villalvazo & Edwin Gonzalez Meza & Pamela Durán-Díaz, 2022. "Neoliberal Urban Development vs. Rural Communities: Land Management Challenges in San Andrés Cholula, Mexico," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Melissa Schumacher & Pamela Durán-Díaz & Anne Kristiina Kurjenoja & Eduardo Gutiérrez-Juárez & David A. González-Rivas, 2019. "Evolution and Collapse of Ejidos in Mexico—To What Extent Is Communal Land Used for Urban Development?," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-21, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew Allan & Ali Soltani & Mohammad Hamed Abdi & Melika Zarei, 2022. "Driving Forces behind Land Use and Land Cover Change: A Systematic and Bibliometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Anna Winiarczyk-Raźniak & Piotr Raźniak, 2021. "Are Pueblos Mágicos Really Magic? Tourism Development Program in the Context of the Quality of Life of Town Residents," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Uchendu Eugene Chigbu, 2020. "Land, Women, Youths, and Land Tools or Methods: Emerging Lessons for Governance and Policy," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-6, December.
    4. Victor Hugo Flores-Armillas & Xavier López-Medellín & Raúl García Barrios & Ian MacGregor-Fors & David Valenzuela-Galván, 2020. "Landscape Features Associated with Damage to Maize ( Zea mays ) Fields in Central México: A Comparison of Wind and Wildlife Damage," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Eduardo Gutiérrez Juárez & Anne Kristiina Kurjenoja & Melissa Schumacher & María Guizar Villalvazo & Edwin Gonzalez Meza & Pamela Durán-Díaz, 2022. "Neoliberal Urban Development vs. Rural Communities: Land Management Challenges in San Andrés Cholula, Mexico," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Leonardo Barleta & Mateo Carrillo & Zephyr Frank & Erik Steiner, 2020. "Ejidos, Urbanization, and the Production of Inequality in Formerly Agricultural Lands, Guadalajara, Mexico, 1975–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Batara Surya & Seri Suriani & Firman Menne & Herminawaty Abubakar & Muhammad Idris & Emil Salim Rasyidi & Hasanuddin Remmang, 2021. "Community Empowerment and Utilization of Renewable Energy: Entrepreneurial Perspective for Community Resilience Based on Sustainable Management of Slum Settlements in Makassar City, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-36, March.
    8. Anne Kristiina Kurjenoja & Melissa Schumacher & Janina Carrera-Kurjenoja, 2021. "Landscape Sensitizing through Expansive Learning in Architectural Education," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Johan Colding & Åsa Gren & Stephan Barthel, 2020. "The Incremental Demise of Urban Green Spaces," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-11, May.
    10. Díaz Baca, Manuel Francisco & Moreno Lerma, Leonardo & Triana Ángel, Natalia & Burkart, Stefan, 2024. "The relationships between land tenure, cattle production, and climate change – A systematic literature review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    11. Emaculate Ingwani, 2021. "Struggles of Women to Access and Hold Landuse and Other Land Property Rights under the Customary Tenure System in Peri-Urban Communal Areas of Zimbabwe," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    12. Pamela Durán-Díaz & Adriana Armenta-Ramírez & Anne Kristiina Kurjenoja & Melissa Schumacher, 2020. "Community Development through the Empowerment of Indigenous Women in Cuetzalan Del Progreso, Mexico," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-25, May.
    13. Martha B. Flores-Romero & Miriam E. Pérez-Romero & José Álvarez-García & María de la Cruz del Río-Rama, 2021. "Bibliometric Mapping of Research on Magic Towns of Mexico," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    14. Gregory J. Scott & Enrique Vigo, 2023. "Growth, innovation, and policy for chicken in Latin America 1961–2019," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(1), January.
    15. Yaopeng Sun & Zhongfa Zhou & Denghong Huang & Quan Chen & Min Fang, 2022. "The Spatial and Temporal Evolution Pattern and Transformation of Urban–Rural Construction Land in Karst Mountainous Areas: Qixingguan District of Guizhou, Southwest China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    16. Juan Von Thaden & Gilberto Binnqüist-Cervantes & Octavio Pérez-Maqueo & Debora Lithgow, 2022. "Half-Century of Forest Change in a Neotropical Peri-Urban Landscape: Drivers and Trends," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, April.
    17. Ying Liu & Rongrong Zhang & Ming Li & Chunshan Zhou, 2020. "What Factors Influence Rural-To-Urban Migrant Peasants to Rent out Their Household Farmland? Evidence from China’s Pearl River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:9-:d:1009290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.