IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i10p1734-d935396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Spatial and Temporal Evolution Pattern and Transformation of Urban–Rural Construction Land in Karst Mountainous Areas: Qixingguan District of Guizhou, Southwest China

Author

Listed:
  • Yaopeng Sun

    (School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China
    School of Geography & Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China
    The Third Surveying and Mapping Institute of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550004, China)

  • Zhongfa Zhou

    (School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China
    School of Geography & Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China
    State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control, Guiyang 550001, China)

  • Denghong Huang

    (School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China
    School of Geography & Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China
    State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control, Guiyang 550001, China)

  • Quan Chen

    (School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China
    School of Geography & Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China
    State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control, Guiyang 550001, China)

  • Min Fang

    (Guizhou Vocational and Technical Collage of Water Resources and Hydropower, Guiyang 551416, China)

Abstract

Studying the temporal and spatial evolution pattern and transformation rule of urban–rural construction land in karst mountainous areas has important guiding significance for urban development boundary planning, red lines for ecological protection, and cultivated land protection. The present study took 46 townships (streets) in Qixingguan District of Guizhou Province, southwest China, as the research area; collected the current status of four-phase land use data in 2009, 2013, 2017, and 2020; and used GIS spatial analysis models and geographical detectors to analyze the temporal and spatial evolution pattern characteristics and influencing factors of urban–rural construction. The results showed the following: (1) Since 2009, the total area of urban–rural construction land has continued to increase; the largest area is rural residential land, followed by urban land and transportation land, with relatively little urban industrial and mining land, scenic spots, and special land. The growth rate of land used for transport increased rapidly, and urban land grew faster than rural residential land. (2) More than 57.72% of the newly increased urban–rural construction land came from cultivated land, but the transformation of cultivated land for construction gradually slowed down; 57.48% of urban–rural construction land was transferred for reclamation as cultivated land. During the study period, the transformation of cultivated land to construction land was more intense (the transfer out of cultivated land was greater than the transfer in by 9541.94 hm 2 ). (3) There are strong spatial differences in the density of urban–rural construction land, showing scattered agglomeration distribution, and the degree of aggregation in medium-high- and high- density areas is further strengthened, expanding to the east and southwest. (4) The growth of urban–rural construction land has been controlled by a variety of complex factors, the most influential of which are the completion of fixed asset investment in society as a whole and the total fiscal revenue, with explanatory power (PD) values of 0.819 and 0.607, respectively. Interactions between detection factors have a greater impact on the spatial differentiation of urban–rural construction land than single factors. The results of this study can provide basic research data and support the control and high-quality development of urban–rural construction land in Qixingguan District and karst mountain areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaopeng Sun & Zhongfa Zhou & Denghong Huang & Quan Chen & Min Fang, 2022. "The Spatial and Temporal Evolution Pattern and Transformation of Urban–Rural Construction Land in Karst Mountainous Areas: Qixingguan District of Guizhou, Southwest China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1734-:d:935396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1734/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1734/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colsaet, Alice & Laurans, Yann & Levrel, Harold, 2018. "What drives land take and urban land expansion? A systematic review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 339-349.
    2. Melissa Schumacher & Pamela Durán-Díaz & Anne Kristiina Kurjenoja & Eduardo Gutiérrez-Juárez & David A. González-Rivas, 2019. "Evolution and Collapse of Ejidos in Mexico—To What Extent Is Communal Land Used for Urban Development?," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Xiangzheng Deng & Jikun Huang & Scott Rozelle & Emi Uchida, 2010. "Economic Growth and the Expansion of Urban Land in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(4), pages 813-843, April.
    4. Fei Chen & Xiaoyong Bai & Fang Liu & Guangjie Luo & Yichao Tian & Luoyi Qin & Yue Li & Yan Xu & Jinfeng Wang & Luhua Wu & Chaojun Li & Sirui Zhang & Chen Ran, 2022. "Analysis Long-Term and Spatial Changes of Forest Cover in Typical Karst Areas of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Ustaoglu, E. & Aydınoglu, A.C., 2020. "Suitability evaluation of urban construction land in Pendik district of Istanbul, Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. Luhua Wu & Shijie Wang & Xiaoyong Bai & Fei Chen & Chaojun Li & Chen Ran & Sirui Zhang, 2022. "Identifying the Multi-Scale Influences of Climate Factors on Runoff Changes in a Typical Karst Watershed Using Wavelet Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-31, August.
    7. Ge, Dazhuan & Long, Hualou & Zhang, Yingnan & Ma, Li & Li, Tingting, 2018. "Farmland transition and its influences on grain production in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 94-105.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lihua Liu & Yuping Chen & Wei Li & Yanfang Zeng & Mingshui Lin, 2023. "Research on Industry Transformation Models and Influencing Factors of Hot Spring Villages from the Perspective of Sustainable Development: A Case Study of Fujian, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew Allan & Ali Soltani & Mohammad Hamed Abdi & Melika Zarei, 2022. "Driving Forces behind Land Use and Land Cover Change: A Systematic and Bibliometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Wu, Rong & Li, Yingcheng & Wang, Shaojian, 2022. "Will the construction of high-speed rail accelerate urban land expansion? Evidences from Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    3. Eda Ustaoglu & Chris Jacobs-Crisioni, 2022. "What Drives Residential Land Expansion and Densification? An Analysis of Growing and Shrinking Regions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, September.
    4. Punzo, Gennaro & Castellano, Rosalia & Bruno, Emma, 2022. "Using geographically weighted regressions to explore spatial heterogeneity of land use influencing factors in Campania (Southern Italy)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. Han, Wenjing & Zhang, Xiaoling & Zheng, Xian, 2020. "Land use regulation and urban land value: Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    6. Jiaxing Cui & Xuesong Kong & Jing Chen & Jianwei Sun & Yuanyuan Zhu, 2021. "Spatially Explicit Evaluation and Driving Factor Identification of Land Use Conflict in Yangtze River Economic Belt," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    7. Bingkui Qiu & Shasha Lu & Min Zhou & Lu Zhang & Yu Deng & Ci Song & Zuo Zhang, 2015. "A Hybrid Inexact Optimization Method for Land-Use Allocation in Association with Environmental/Ecological Requirements at a Watershed Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-25, April.
    8. Lin Meng & Wentao Si, 2022. "The Driving Mechanism of Urban Land Expansion from 2005 to 2018: The Case of Yangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, November.
    9. Tang, Peng & Feng, Yue & Li, Min & Zhang, Yanyan, 2021. "Can the performance evaluation change from central government suppress illegal land use in local governments? A new interpretation of Chinese decentralisation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    10. ChuangLin Fang & XingLiang Guan & ShaSha Lu & Min Zhou & Yu Deng, 2013. "Input–Output Efficiency of Urban Agglomerations in China: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(13), pages 2766-2790, October.
    11. Liu, Yansui & Zhou, Yang, 2021. "Territory spatial planning and national governance system in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    12. Xiaowei Yao & Ting Luo & Yingjun Xu & Wanxu Chen & Jie Zeng, 2022. "Prediction of Spatiotemporal Changes in Sloping Cropland in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Region under Different Scenarios," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Xinyao Li & Lingzhi Wang & Bryan Pijanowski & Lingpeng Pan & Hichem Omrani & Anqi Liang & Yi Qu, 2022. "The Spatio-Temporal Pattern and Transition Mode of Recessive Cultivated Land Use Morphology in the Huaibei Region of the Jiangsu Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Tao, Jieyi & Lu, Yuqi & Ge, Dazhuan & Dong, Ping & Gong, Xiao & Ma, Xiaobin, 2022. "The spatial pattern of agricultural ecosystem services from the production-living-ecology perspective: A case study of the Huaihai Economic Zone, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    15. Siyi Chen & Zhigang Chen & Yan Shen, 2021. "Can improving law enforcement effectively curb illegal land use in China?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Shasha Lu & Xingliang Guan & Chao He & Jiali Zhang, 2014. "Spatio-Temporal Patterns and Policy Implications of Urban Land Expansion in Metropolitan Areas: A Case Study of Wuhan Urban Agglomeration, Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-26, July.
    17. Su, Baozhong & Li, Yuheng & Li, Lequn & Wang, Yue, 2018. "How does nonfarm employment stability influence farmers' farmland transfer decisions? Implications for China’s land use policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 66-72.
    18. Changchang Liu & Chuxiong Deng & Zhongwu Li & Yaojun Liu & Shuyuan Wang, 2022. "Optimization of Spatial Pattern of Land Use: Progress, Frontiers, and Prospects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-22, May.
    19. Jelena Živanović Miljković & Omiljena Dželebdžić & Nataša Čolić, 2022. "Land-Use Change Dynamics of Agricultural Land within Belgrade–Novi Sad Highway Corridor: A Spatial Planning Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, September.
    20. Han Huang & Yang Zhou & Mingjie Qian & Zhaoqi Zeng, 2021. "Land Use Transition and Driving Forces in Chinese Loess Plateau: A Case Study from Pu County, Shanxi Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1734-:d:935396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.