IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i9p1604-d918424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Perceived Risk on Public Participation Intention in Smart City Development: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Qinghong Cui

    (School of Management Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266525, China)

  • Ruirui Wei

    (School of Management Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266525, China)

  • Rong Huang

    (School of Management Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266525, China)

  • Xiancun Hu

    (School of Design and the Built Environment, University of Canberra, Canberra 2601, Australia)

  • Guangbin Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

Abstract

Smart city development aims at sustainable development and high quality of urban life, which requires the participation of stakeholders. As a crucial stakeholder involved, the public’s key role has been widely concerned. However, a lack of public participation in smart city development still exists due to perceived risk. In order to solve the insufficient public participation in smart city development, this study will identify the perceived risk and explore its influential impact. After defining the concept of perceived risk, this paper constructs a theoretical model concerning the effect of perceived risk on public participation intention based on the theory of reasoned action. On the basis of 193 empirical data from China, the structural equation model is applied to test the influential impact of perceived risk on the public participation intention in smart city development. The results show that the perceived risk has a significantly negative effect on public participation intention, attitude, and subjective norms, while behavioral attitude and subjective norms have positive effects on public participation intention. According to empirical research results, the risk prevention paths and methods of public participation in smart city development are proposed so as to provide useful implications for further public participation practice in smart city development.

Suggested Citation

  • Qinghong Cui & Ruirui Wei & Rong Huang & Xiancun Hu & Guangbin Wang, 2022. "The Effect of Perceived Risk on Public Participation Intention in Smart City Development: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1604-:d:918424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1604/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1604/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reny Nadlifatin & Shu-Chiang Lin & Yulia Puspa Rachmaniati & Satria Fadil Persada & Mohammad Razif, 2016. "A Pro-Environmental Reasoned Action Model for Measuring Citizens’ Intentions regarding Ecolabel Product Usage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-10, November.
    2. Junze Wang & Sheng Zhao & Wei Zhang & Richard Evans, 2021. "Why people adopt smart transportation services: an integrated model of TAM, trust and perceived risk," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6), pages 629-646, August.
    3. Featherman, Mauricio & Jia, Shizhen (Jasper) & Califf, Christopher B. & Hajli, Nick, 2021. "The impact of new technologies on consumers beliefs: Reducing the perceived risks of electric vehicle adoption," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    4. Aiping Wang & Weifen Lin & Bei Liu & Hui Wang & Hong Xu, 2021. "Does Smart City Construction Improve the Green Utilization Efficiency of Urban Land?," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Sokolov, Alexander & Veselitskaya, Natalia & Carabias, Vicente & Yildirim, Onur, 2019. "Scenario-based identification of key factors for smart cities development policies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    6. Zezhou Wu & Mingyang Jiang & Heng Li & Xiaoling Zhang, 2021. "Mapping the Knowledge Domain of Smart City Development to Urban Sustainability: A Scientometric Study," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1-2), pages 29-53, April.
    7. Wenqing Zhang & Liangliang Liu, 2022. "Unearthing consumers’ intention to adopt eco-friendly smart home services: an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(2), pages 216-239, January.
    8. Peng Jing & Hao Huang & Bin Ran & Fengping Zhan & Yuji Shi, 2019. "Exploring the Factors Affecting Mode Choice Intention of Autonomous Vehicle Based on an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior—A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Seunghwan Myeong & Yuseok Jung & Eunuk Lee, 2018. "A Study on Determinant Factors in Smart City Development: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Zhihua Xu & Jingzhu Shan & Jingmei Li & Wensi Zhang, 2020. "Extending the theory of planned behavior to predict public participation behavior in air pollution control: Beijing, China," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(4), pages 669-688, March.
    11. Zhenming Li & Siu Shing Man & Alan Hoi Shou Chan & Jianfang Zhu, 2021. "Integration of Theory of Planned Behavior, Sensation Seeking, and Risk Perception to Explain the Risky Driving Behavior of Truck Drivers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, May.
    12. Nripendra P. Rana & Sunil Luthra & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Rubina Islam & Sian Roderick & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2019. "Barriers to the Development of Smart Cities in Indian Context," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 503-525, June.
    13. Hsiang Te Liu & Ruey-Chyn Tsaur, 2020. "The Theory of Reasoned Action Applied to Green Smartphones: Moderating Effect of Government Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Paul, Justin & Modi, Ashwin & Patel, Jayesh, 2016. "Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 123-134.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ibrahim Mutambik & Abdullah Almuqrin & Fawaz Alharbi & Majed Abusharhah, 2023. "How to Encourage Public Engagement in Smart City Development—Learning from Saudi Arabia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Yue, Aobo & Mao, Chao & Wang, Zhuoqi & Peng, Wuxue & Zhao, Shuming, 2024. "Finding the pioneers of China's smart cities: From the perspective of construction efficiency and construction performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fraccascia, Luca & Ceccarelli, Gaia & Dangelico, Rosa Maria, 2023. "Green products from industrial symbiosis: Are consumers ready for them?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Qinghong Cui & Run Chen & Ruirui Wei & Xiancun Hu & Guangbin Wang, 2023. "Smart Mega-City Development in Practice: A Case of Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Tuğba Yeğin & Muhammad Ikram, 2022. "Analysis of Consumers’ Electric Vehicle Purchase Intentions: An Expansion of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, September.
    4. Yueling Xu & Wenyu Zhang & Haijun Bao & Shuai Zhang & Ying Xiang, 2019. "A SEM–Neural Network Approach to Predict Customers’ Intention to Purchase Battery Electric Vehicles in China’s Zhejiang Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Mimica R. Milošević & Dušan M. Milošević & Ana D. Stanojević & Dragan M. Stević & Dušan J. Simjanović, 2021. "Fuzzy and Interval AHP Approaches in Sustainable Management for the Architectural Heritage in Smart Cities," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-29, February.
    6. Diana Puspita Sari & Nur Aini Masruroh & Anna Maria Sri Asih, 2021. "Consumer Intention to Participate in E-Waste Collection Programs: A Study of Smartphone Waste in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-28, March.
    7. Naihui Wang & Yulong Pei & Hao Fu, 2022. "Public Acceptance of Last-Mile Shuttle Bus Services with Automation and Electrification in Cold-Climate Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Jacky Chin & Bernard C. Jiang & Ilma Mufidah & Satria Fadil Persada & Bustanul Arifin Noer, 2018. "The Investigation of Consumers’ Behavior Intention in Using Green Skincare Products: A Pro-Environmental Behavior Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Paola Briganti & Concetta Metallo & Maria Margherita Pagliuca & Luisa Varriale, 2023. "Exploring Citizens’ Behavior to Promote Environmental Sustainability: The Role of Information Overload and Urban Sustainable Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Idrees Waris & Rashid Ali & Anand Nayyar & Mohammed Baz & Ran Liu & Irfan Hameed, 2022. "An Empirical Evaluation of Customers’ Adoption of Drone Food Delivery Services: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Mora, Luca & Gerli, Paolo & Ardito, Lorenzo & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2023. "Smart city governance from an innovation management perspective: Theoretical framing, review of current practices, and future research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    12. Navidreza Alizadeh Bazrafshan & Omid Ali Kharazmi, 2022. "Contextual challenges of smart city implementation in Mashhad, Iran's second‐largest metropolis," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(5), September.
    13. Fu, Xuemei, 2024. "Understanding the adoption intention for electric vehicles: The role of hedonic-utilitarian values," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    14. Jaiswal, Deepak & Kaushal, Vikrant & Kant, Rishi & Kumar Singh, Pankaj, 2021. "Consumer adoption intention for electric vehicles: Insights and evidence from Indian sustainable transportation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    15. Tiantian Gu & Shuyu Liu & Xuefan Liu & Yujia Shan & Enyang Hao & Miaomiao Niu, 2023. "Evaluation of the Smart City and Analysis of Its Spatial–Temporal Characteristics in China: A Case Study of 26 Cities in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, September.
    16. Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq & Cheuk Yin Wai & Nitin Muttil, 2020. "Vulnerability Assessment of Ubiquitous Cities Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Rambabu Lavuri & Abhinav Jindal & Umair Akram & Bhukya Koteswara Rao Naik & Alrence Santiago Halibas, 2023. "Exploring the antecedents of sustainable consumers' purchase intentions: Evidence from emerging countries," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 280-291, February.
    18. Shyue Chuan Chong & Foong Yee Tan & Pei Yew Mah & Choon Wei Low, 2020. "Consumers¡¯ Purchase Intention Toward Ergonomic Footwear in Malaysia," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(2), pages 88-96, April.
    19. Joey F George & Rui Chen & Lingyao Yuan, 2021. "Intent to purchase IoT home security devices: Fear vs privacy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, September.
    20. Mariusz J. Ligarski & Tomasz Owczarek, 2024. "Preparing Quality of Life Surveys Versus Using Information for Sustainable Development: The Example of Polish Cities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 765-782, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1604-:d:918424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.