IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i9p1527-d911206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Typology, Preservation, and Regeneration of the Post-1949 Industrial Heritage in China: A Case Study of Shanghai

Author

Listed:
  • Chaoyu Mo

    (Department of Architecture, School of Design, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Lin Wang

    (Department of Architecture, School of Design, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Fujie Rao

    (Department of Architecture, School of Design, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

Abstract

Industrial heritage is one of the most neglected types of cultural heritage and urban landscape, often being vulnerable to rather than blessed by urban (re)development. China is confronting an unprecedentedly intensive challenge of preserving industrial heritage, as the country has rapidly shifted towards post-industrialization only several years after being recognized as the “world’s factory” in the 21st century. However, none of the existing literature has systematically investigated the typology and preservation of China’s post-1949 industrial heritage. This research selects Shanghai—the largest metropolis and a prime industrial hub in China— for the case study, and examines 83 accredited modern industrial heritage sites in the city through typological analysis, descriptive statistical analysis, and GIS spatial analysis. Two principal findings are identified. First, there is a diverse range of the post-1949 industrial heritage in China, by industries, time, and spatial forms. Particularly the industrial block—where industrial development is intermingled with the surrounding urban fabric—is the dominant spatial type. Second, the preservation and regeneration of China’s post-1949 industrial heritage in the suburbs are substantially more complex and more threatened than those in the inner city. This study concludes by providing implications for enhanced management and investigation of China’s post-1949 industrial heritage preservation and regeneration.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaoyu Mo & Lin Wang & Fujie Rao, 2022. "Typology, Preservation, and Regeneration of the Post-1949 Industrial Heritage in China: A Case Study of Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1527-:d:911206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1527/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1527/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mahir Yazar & Dina Hestad & Diana Mangalagiu & Yuge Ma & Thomas F Thornton & Ali Kerem Saysel & Dajian Zhu, 2020. "Enabling environments for regime destabilization towards sustainable urban transitions in megacities: comparing Shanghai and Istanbul," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 727-752, June.
    2. Carmen Hidalgo-Giralt & Antonio Palacios-García & Diego Barrado-Timón & José Antonio Rodríguez-Esteban, 2021. "Urban Industrial Tourism: Cultural Sustainability as a Tool for Confronting Overtourism—Cases of Madrid, Brussels, and Copenhagen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, April.
    3. A. Agapiou & V. Lysandrou & K. Themistocleous & D. G. Hadjimitsis, 2016. "Risk assessment of cultural heritage sites clusters using satellite imagery and GIS: the case study of Paphos District, Cyprus," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 83(1), pages 5-20, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yunfei Lin & Mingxing Song, 2024. "Exploring the Potential of Generative Adversarial Networks in Enhancing Urban Renewal Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-15, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ram, Manish & Gulagi, Ashish & Aghahosseini, Arman & Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Breyer, Christian, 2022. "Energy transition in megacities towards 100% renewable energy: A case for Delhi," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 578-589.
    2. Xiubai Li & Jinok Susanna Kim & Timothy J. Lee, 2021. "Collaboration for Community-Based Cultural Sustainability in Island Tourism Development: A Case in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Miloš Aranđelović & Aleksandar Videnović & Nebojša Gadžić & Dušan Tomanović, 2022. "Repurposing and the Impact of New Facilities on the Potential Presentation of Industrial Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-13, May.
    4. Hechi Wang & Xinxin Chen & Jianwei Ge & Zhaoyi Yan & Xinyi He & Yingqiu Song & Qi Zhou, 2023. "Research on the Spatiotemporal Distribution and Cultural Tourism Strategy of Modern Educational Architectural Heritage in Nanjing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    5. Jochen Hinkel & Diana Mangalagiu & Alexander Bisaro & J. David Tàbara, 2020. "Transformative narratives for climate action," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 495-506, June.
    6. Li Li & Rundong Feng & Jianchao Xi, 2021. "Ecological Risk Assessment and Protection Zone Identification for Linear Cultural Heritage: A Case Study of the Ming Great Wall," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1527-:d:911206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.