IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i6p769-d823023.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Take Processes and Challenges for Urban Agriculture: A Spatial Analysis for Novi Sad, Serbia

Author

Listed:
  • Jelena Živanović Miljković

    (Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Vesna Popović

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Aleksandra Gajić

    (Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

Food security is becoming an increasingly important issue worldwide, and in this respect, urban agriculture has a substantial role. Nonetheless, pressure for agricultural land conversion and fragmentation is highest in peri-urban areas. In order to respond to these challenges, urban farmers use different adaptation strategies and business models, including product differentiation based on geographical indications (GIs). The paper considers land take (LT) issues in Futog, the settlement of the City of Novi Sad, registered as the GI of Futog cabbage , as an illustrative example which reflects the attitude of land use policy and planning in Serbia towards the specific conditions and requirements that growers of GIs have to meet. The purpose of this study is to identify the role of urban land use planning within LT processes and the implications this has on urban agriculture, accordingly. The supporting framework used for quantifying LT in the period 2000–2018 was CORINE Land Cover (CLC), specifically Urban Atlas (UA) datasets for two time series between 2012 and 2018. Since a significant part of agricultural land registered as a GI in Futog was planned for conversion into construction land, the authors conclude that current forms of land use planning in Serbia are not adequate to ensure the protection of either urban agriculture or GIs. Given that there is a clear correlation between GI products and their place of origin, this study recognized the necessary inclusion of all protected agricultural areas, as well as areas with GIs, into legislation binding for land use planning in Serbia, with limitations in terms of new LT.

Suggested Citation

  • Jelena Živanović Miljković & Vesna Popović & Aleksandra Gajić, 2022. "Land Take Processes and Challenges for Urban Agriculture: A Spatial Analysis for Novi Sad, Serbia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:6:p:769-:d:823023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/6/769/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/6/769/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coline Perrin & Camille Clément & Romain Melot & Brigitte Nougarèdes, 2020. "Preserving Farmland on the Urban Fringe: A Literature Review on Land Policies in Developed Countries," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Claire Durand & Stéphane Fournier, 2017. "Can geographical indications modernize Indonesian and Vietnamese agriculture? Analyzing the role of national and local governments and producers’ strategies," Post-Print hal-01651307, HAL.
    3. Boglarka Z. Gulyas & Jill L. Edmondson, 2021. "Increasing City Resilience through Urban Agriculture: Challenges and Solutions in the Global North," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Sina Shahab & Thomas Hartmann & Arend Jonkman, 2021. "Strategies of municipal land policies: housing development in Germany, Belgium, and Netherlands," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(6), pages 1132-1150, June.
    5. Agnieszka Wnęk & Dawid Kudas & Premysl Stych, 2021. "National Level Land-Use Changes in Functional Urban Areas in Poland, Slovakia, and Czechia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.
    6. World Bank, 2004. "Serbia : Investment Climate Asessment," World Bank Publications - Reports 14501, The World Bank Group.
    7. Ciro Gardi & Panos Panagos & Marc Van Liedekerke & Claudio Bosco & Delphine De Brogniez, 2015. "Land take and food security: assessment of land take on the agricultural production in Europe," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(5), pages 898-912, May.
    8. Colsaet, Alice & Laurans, Yann & Levrel, Harold, 2018. "What drives land take and urban land expansion? A systematic review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 339-349.
    9. Popovic, Vesna & Saric, Radojica & Jovanovic, Marijana, 2012. "Sustainability Of Agriculture In Danube Basin Area," Economics of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 59(1), pages 1-15, April.
    10. Zazo Moratalla, Ana & Paül, Valerià, 2022. "What is an Agricultural Park? Observations from the Spanish Experience," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    11. Kathrin Specht & Rosemarie Siebert & Susanne Thomaier, 2016. "Perception and acceptance of agricultural production in and on urban buildings (ZFarming): a qualitative study from Berlin, Germany," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 33(4), pages 753-769, December.
    12. Alison J. Eagle & David E. Eagle & Tracy E. Stobbe & G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2015. "Farmland Protection and Agricultural Land Values at the Urban-Rural Fringe: British Columbia's Agricultural Land Reserve," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 97(1), pages 282-298.
    13. Durand, Claire & Fournier, Stéphane, 2017. "Can Geographical Indications Modernize Indonesian and Vietnamese Agriculture? Analyzing the Role of National and Local Governments and Producers’ Strategies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 93-104.
    14. Elisabeth Marquard & Stephan Bartke & Judith Gifreu i Font & Alois Humer & Arend Jonkman & Evelin Jürgenson & Naja Marot & Lien Poelmans & Blaž Repe & Robert Rybski & Christoph Schröter-Schlaack & Jar, 2020. "Land Consumption and Land Take: Enhancing Conceptual Clarity for Evaluating Spatial Governance in the EU Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Alexander Wandl & Marcello Magoni, 2017. "Sustainable Planning of Peri-Urban Areas: Introduction to the Special Issue," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 1-3, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jelena Živanović Miljković & Omiljena Dželebdžić & Nataša Čolić, 2022. "Land-Use Change Dynamics of Agricultural Land within Belgrade–Novi Sad Highway Corridor: A Spatial Planning Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Zhiqiang Zhou & Wenyan Liu & Huilin Wang & Jingyu Yang, 2022. "The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Agricultural Productivity: From the Perspective of Digital Transformation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Vlaďka Kirschner & Daniel Franke & Veronika Řezáčová & Tomáš Peltan, 2022. "Poorer Regions Consume More Undeveloped but Less High-Quality Land Than Wealthier Regions—A Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jelena Živanović Miljković & Omiljena Dželebdžić & Nataša Čolić, 2022. "Land-Use Change Dynamics of Agricultural Land within Belgrade–Novi Sad Highway Corridor: A Spatial Planning Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Somayeh Ahani & Hashem Dadashpoor, 2021. "Urban growth containment policies for the guidance and control of peri-urbanization: a review and proposed framework," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14215-14244, October.
    3. Vlaďka Kirschner & Daniel Franke & Veronika Řezáčová & Tomáš Peltan, 2022. "Poorer Regions Consume More Undeveloped but Less High-Quality Land Than Wealthier Regions—A Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Eda Ustaoglu & Chris Jacobs-Crisioni, 2022. "What Drives Residential Land Expansion and Densification? An Analysis of Growing and Shrinking Regions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, September.
    5. Chunyan Li & Jianmei Gao & Lanqing Ge & Weina Hu & Qi Ban, 2023. "Do Geographical Indication Products Promote the Growth of the Agricultural Economy? An Empirical Study Based on Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Decoville, Antoine & Feltgen, Valérie, 2023. "Clarifying the EU objective of no net land take: A necessity to avoid the cure being worse than the disease," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    7. Shuichiro Kajima & Yuta Uchiyama & Ryo Kohsaka, 2020. "Intellectual Property Strategies for Timber and Forest Products: The Case of Regional Collective Trademark Applications by Japanese Forestry Associations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Schatz, Eva-Maria & Bovet, Jana & Lieder, Sebastian & Schroeter-Schlaack, Christoph & Strunz, Sebastian & Marquard, Elisabeth, 2021. "Land take in environmental assessments: Recent advances and persisting challenges in selected EU countries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    9. Morgane Millet & Valerie Keast & Stefano Gonano & François Casabianca, 2020. "Product Qualification as a Means of Identifying Sustainability Pathways for Place-Based Agri-Food Systems: The Case of the GI Corsican Grapefruit (France)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, September.
    10. Miroslav Čavlin & Nedeljko Prdić & Svetlana Ignjatijević & Jelena Vapa Tankosić & Nemanja Lekić & Sara Kostić, 2023. "Research on the Determination of the Factors Affecting Business Performance in Beekeeping Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Rita Nicolau & Beatriz Condessa, 2022. "Monitoring Net Land Take: Is Mainland Portugal on Track to Meet the 2050 Target?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-31, July.
    12. Xinyu Yang & Weidong Liu, 2022. "Agricultural Production Networks and Upgrading from a Global–Local Perspective: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, October.
    13. Dominik Bertram & Tobias Chilla & Carola Wilhelm, 2021. "Short Value Chains in Food Production: The Role of Spatial Proximity for Economic and Land Use Dynamics," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.
    14. Francesco Botticini & Armands Auzins & Peter Lacoere & Odette Lewis & Michela Tiboni, 2022. "Land Take and Value Capture: Towards More Efficient Land Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-28, January.
    15. Hjalager, Anne-Mette & Staunstrup, Jan Kloster & Sørensen, Michael Tophøj & Steffansen, Rasmus Nedergård, 2022. "The densification of second home areas — sustainable practice or speculative land use?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    16. Mariagiulia Mariani & Claire Cerdan & Iuri Peri, 2022. "Cultural biodiversity unpacked, separating discourse from practice," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(2), pages 773-789, June.
    17. Guanghao Wu, 2024. "From Soil to Soul: Agro-Product Geographical Indications and the Subjective Well-Being of Rural Residents," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 1-25, August.
    18. Matthew J. Zinsli, 2023. "Authorizing the ‘taste of place’ for Galápagos Islands coffee: scientific knowledge, development politics, and power in geographical indication implementation," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(2), pages 581-597, June.
    19. Javier Sanz-Cañada & José Luis Sánchez-Hernández & Daniel López-García, 2023. "Reflecting on the Concept of Local Agroecological Food Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, May.
    20. Jonkman, Arend & Meijer, Rick & Hartmann, Thomas, 2022. "Land for housing: Quantitative targets and qualitative ambitions in Dutch housing development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:6:p:769-:d:823023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.