IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i5p616-d799277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Geographic Analysis on Rural Reconstruction-Transformation-Revitalization: A Case Study of Jianghan Plain in China

Author

Listed:
  • Mingjie Wang

    (Hubei Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis and Simulation, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
    School of Public Administration, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271000, China)

  • Bin Yu

    (Hubei Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis and Simulation, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Rongrong Zhuo

    (School of Public Administration, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Zhuofan Li

    (Hubei Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis and Simulation, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

Abstract

At the beginning of the 21st century, with the rapid advancement of industrialization and urbanization, production factors such as population, capital, and land between urban and rural areas in China have gradually shifted to non-agricultural fields, the structure and function of rural territorial systems have been reconstructed and transformed therewith. In response to the relatively declining villages, the Chinese government proposed rural revitalization strategy. Taking the human–land relationship as the theoretical basis and functional changes of rural region as the main line, the study analyzes the characteristics of rural reconstruction, interprets the rural transformation mechanism and deconstructs paths of rural revitalization by using the rural reconstruction index, the model of rural transformation measurement and rural spatial transformation effect. The case study shows that: (1) Rural reconstruction in Jianghan Plain is characterized by temporal continuity and spatial imbalance. The periodical changes presents from social-reconstruction-dominated, economic-reconstruction-dominated to spatial reconstruction -dominated. The distribution of high values varied from the U-type to O-type along the main transportation routes, while that of low values alternated between points (hinterlands of the Plain) and lines from spatial viewpoint. (2) The driving mechanism of rural transformation was the coupling effect of the exogenous drivers and endogenous responses. The standardized regression coefficient between the drivers and the changes to rural regional functions is 0.766. The endogenous response is mainly manifested as the negative effect of the rural spatial reconstruction on the territorial agriculture-oriented function. (3) The key path of rural revitalization facilitated the optimization of regional functions through reorganization of the rural elements in Jianghan Plain. It is the strategic choice of rural areas to implement regional function zoning and realize the balance of spatial function. The research results can provide inspiration for theoretical research on rural geography, and provide policy and method support for rural revitalization in case areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingjie Wang & Bin Yu & Rongrong Zhuo & Zhuofan Li, 2022. "A Geographic Analysis on Rural Reconstruction-Transformation-Revitalization: A Case Study of Jianghan Plain in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:5:p:616-:d:799277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/5/616/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/5/616/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Cloke & Owain Jones, 2001. "Dwelling, Place, and Landscape: An Orchard in Somerset," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(4), pages 649-666, April.
    2. Neil Ward & Philip Lowe & Tom Bridges, 2003. "Rural and Regional Development: The Role of the Regional Development Agencies in England," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 201-214.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qiqi Yin & Shenglu Zhou & Chengxiang Lv & Yang Zhang & Xueyan Sui & Xiaorui Wang, 2022. "Comprehensive Land Consolidation as a Tool to Promote Rural Restructuring in China: Theoretical Framework and Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Zhiyuan Yang & Dong Yang & Jingjie Geng & Fengxia Tian, 2022. "Evaluation of Suitability and Spatial Distribution of Rural Settlements in the Karst Mountainous Area of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Xigui Li & Pengnan Xiao & Yong Zhou & Jie Xu & Qing Wu, 2022. "The Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics of Cultivated Land Multifunction and Its Trade-Off/Synergy Relationship in the Two Lake Plains," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-34, November.
    4. Zhiwei Xu & Wanwan Si & Huilin Song & Liang Yao & Kaibiao Xiang & Zhenmin Cheng, 2022. "Empirical Analysis of Population Urbanization and Residents’ Life Satisfaction—Based on 2017 CGSS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Zhuofan Li, 2022. "The Correlation Effects and Mechanisms of Rural Restructuring and Transformation: A Case Study of the Jianghan Plain in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Yaofu Huang & Luan Chen & Xun Li, 2022. "Productivism and Post-Productivism: An Analysis of Functional Mixtures in Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gary Bosworth & Hanne Bat Finke, 2020. "Commercial Counterurbanisation: A driving force in rural economic development," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(3), pages 654-674, May.
    2. Varley, Peter & Medway, Dominic, 2011. "Ecosophy and tourism: Rethinking a mountain resort," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 902-911.
    3. Zhou, Lingxu, 2020. "Hitchhiking tourism and social trust: exploring Chinese experiences through travel blogs," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    4. Terzidou, Matina & Scarles, Caroline & Saunders, Mark N.K., 2017. "Religiousness as tourist performances: A case study of Greek Orthodox pilgrimage," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 116-129.
    5. Hanne B Finke & Gary Bosworth, 2016. "Exploring the character of rural businesses: Performing change and continuity," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 31(5), pages 619-636, August.
    6. Zhiwei Xu & Wanwan Si & Huilin Song & Liang Yao & Kaibiao Xiang & Zhenmin Cheng, 2022. "Empirical Analysis of Population Urbanization and Residents’ Life Satisfaction—Based on 2017 CGSS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Steven Musson & Adam Tickell & Peter John, 2005. "A Decade of Decentralisation? Assessing the Role of the Government Offices for the English Regions," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(8), pages 1395-1412, August.
    8. Winter, Michael, 2004. "The Political Geography of EU Agricultural Policy Adjustment," IAPRAP\IATRC Summer Symposium, Adjusting to Domestic and International Agricultural Reform in Industrial Countries, June 6-7, 2004, Philadelphia, PA, 15758, International Agricultural Policy Reform and Adjustment Project (IAPRAP).
    9. József Benedek, 2010. "Die demographische und wirtschaftliche Grundlagen einer integrierten Entwicklungspolitik in ländlichen Räumen Rumäniens," Theory Methodology Practice (TMP), Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 6(02), pages 93-100.
    10. Angel Paniagua, 2023. "Conceptualizing New Materialism in Geographical Studies of the Rural Realm," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, January.
    11. Michael Keating & Linda Stevenson, 2006. "Rural policy in Scotland after devolution," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 397-407.
    12. John Harrison & Jesse Heley, 2015. "Governing beyond the metropolis: Placing the rural in city-region development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(6), pages 1113-1133, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:5:p:616-:d:799277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.