IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i2p303-d751000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation and Improvement of Cultivated Land Leisure Service Function Based on Multisource Spatial Data

Author

Listed:
  • Yiming Yang

    (College of Resources and Environment, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
    School of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Xiuli Wang

    (College of Resources and Environment, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
    Henan Engineering Research Center of Land Consolidation and Ecological Restoration, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

  • Jian Wang

    (School of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Yiwei Geng

    (College of Resources and Environment, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

  • Weiqiang Chen

    (College of Resources and Environment, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
    Henan Engineering Research Center of Land Consolidation and Ecological Restoration, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

  • Qun Wu

    (School of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Xiaoke Guan

    (Social Development Research Center, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

Abstract

The leisure service function is an important component of the derivative function and non-market function of cultivated land. Therefore, exploring the strength of the cultivated land leisure service function with the help of spatial information technology is significant in guiding the proper utilization and protection of cultivated land resources. This paper constructed an evaluation system based on the three dimensions of ecological landscape, social activities, and economic performance, explored the spatial difference of the cultivated land leisure service function in Yuanyang County, the major grain-producing area along the Yellow River through spatial weighted overlay, classified the hot spots of leisure services and presented suggestions for improvement. Results show the following: (1) the landscape resources in the northern part are relatively monotonous, while those in the southern part are rich and evenly distributed. Spatial accessibility presents a distribution of “one core with multiple subcores”. The distribution of leisure service supply capacity is characterized by “multiple cores and multiple circles.” (2) The hot spots of the cultivated land leisure service function are the Urban Agricultural Central Area and the Ecological Agriculture Core Area in the middle of the county, and the Suburban Agritourism Development Area, the Yellow River Agritourism Transitional Area, and the Leisure Agriculture Connection Area on the periphery of the county. (3) The agricultural landscape should be fully protected and utilized in the Urban Agricultural Central Area. The spatial accessibility and regional reputation of the Ecological Agriculture Core Area need to be improved. The landscape diversity and landscape quality should be improved in the Suburban Agritourism Development Area. The Yellow River Agritourism Transitional Area needs to overcome the loss of tourists. The Leisure Agriculture Connection Area should increase the number of leisure and tourism facilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiming Yang & Xiuli Wang & Jian Wang & Yiwei Geng & Weiqiang Chen & Qun Wu & Xiaoke Guan, 2022. "Evaluation and Improvement of Cultivated Land Leisure Service Function Based on Multisource Spatial Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:303-:d:751000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/2/303/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/2/303/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chin†Huang Huang, 2017. "Estimating the environmental effects and recreational benefits of cultivated flower land for environmental quality improvement in Taiwan," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 48(1), pages 29-39, January.
    2. Chen, Zhu & Zhang, Anlu & Zhou, Kehao & Huang, Lingxiang, 2021. "Can payment tools substitute for regulatory ones? Estimating the policy preference for agricultural land preservation, Tianjin, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    3. A Fleischer & Y Tsur, 2000. "Measuring the recreational value of agricultural landscape," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 27(3), pages 385-398, September.
    4. You, Heyuan & Hu, Xiaowei & Wu, Yizhou, 2018. "Farmland use intensity changes in response to rural transition in Zhejiang province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 350-361.
    5. Ayala Wineman & Thomas S Jayne, 2018. "Land Prices Heading Skyward? An Analysis of Farmland Values across Tanzania," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 40(2), pages 187-214.
    6. Alison J. Eagle & David E. Eagle & Tracy E. Stobbe & G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2015. "Farmland Protection and Agricultural Land Values at the Urban-Rural Fringe: British Columbia's Agricultural Land Reserve," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 97(1), pages 282-298.
    7. Siyu Zhang & Weiyan Hu & Liejia Huang & Hongjie Du, 2019. "Exploring the Effectiveness of Multifunctional Cultivated Land Protection Linking Supply to Demand in Value Engineering Theory: Evidence from Wuhan Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Shan He & Lin Lin & Qian Xu & Chenxia Hu & Mengmeng Zhou & Jinhua Liu & Yongjun Li & Ke Wang, 2021. "Farmland Zoning Integrating Agricultural Multi-Functional Supply, Demand and Relationships: A Case Study of the Hangzhou Metropolitan Area, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Chin-Huang Huang & Chiung-Hsia Wang, 2015. "Estimating the Total Economic Value of Cultivated Flower Land in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chengxiu Li & Xiuli Wang & Zhengxin Ji & Ling Li & Xiaoke Guan, 2022. "Optimizing the Use of Cultivated Land in China’s Main Grain-Producing Areas from the Dual Perspective of Ecological Security and Leading-Function Zoning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-20, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baoshu Wu & Meifang Liu & Yufei Wan & Zhenjiang Song, 2023. "Evolution and Coordination of Cultivated Land Multifunctionality in Poyang Lake Ecological Economic Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Ritter, Matthias & Hüttel, Silke & Odening, Martin & Seifert, Stefan, 2020. "Revisiting the relationship between land price and parcel size in agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. Li Yu & Zhanqi Wang & Hongwei Zhang & Chao Wei, 2020. "Spatial-Temporal Differentiation Analysis of Agricultural Land Use Intensity and Its Driving Factors at the County Scale: A Case Study in Hubei Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Emmanuelle Quillérou & Rob Fraser, 2010. "Adverse Selection in the Environmental Stewardship Scheme: Does the Higher Level Stewardship Scheme Design Reduce Adverse Selection?," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 369-380, June.
    5. Chun-Chu Yeh & Cheng-Shen Lin & Chin-Huang Huang, 2018. "The Total Economic Value of Sport Tourism in Belt and Road Development—An Environmental Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    6. Leiva, Benjamin & Van Houtven, George & Vásquez, William F. & Nájera, Andrea, 2023. "Valuing water service reliability and in-home water storage: A hedonic price model from Guatemala," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    7. Ligang Lyu & Zhoubing Gao & Hualou Long & Xiaorui Wang & Yeting Fan, 2021. "Farmland Use Transition in a Typical Farming Area: The Case of Sihong County in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Wei Wang & Xin Luo & Chongmei Zhang & Jiahao Song & Dingde Xu, 2021. "Can Land Transfer Alleviate the Poverty of the Elderly? Evidence from Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Liejia Huang & Yue Feng & Boqing Zhang & Weiyan Hu, 2021. "Spatio-Temporal Characteristics and Obstacle Factors of Cultivated Land Resources Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Kristin Jürkenbeck & Achim Spiller, 2020. "Consumers’ Evaluation of Stockfree-Organic Agriculture—A Segmentation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    11. William F. Vásquez & Laura Beaudin, 2020. "On the use of hypothetical price data to estimate hedonic models in a developing country context," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 219-231, December.
    12. Lin, Wensheng & Huang, Jikun, 2021. "Impacts of agricultural incentive policies on land rental prices: New evidence from China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    13. Guizhi Wang & Yingxi Song & Jibo Chen & Jun Yu, 2016. "Valuation of Haze Management and Prevention Using the Contingent Valuation Method with the Sure Independence Screening Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-11, March.
    14. Xindong Wei & Ning Wang & Pingping Luo & Jie Yang & Jian Zhang & Kangli Lin, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Assessment of Land Marketization and Its Driving Forces for Sustainable Urban–Rural Development in Shaanxi Province in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Xupeng Zhang & Danling Chen & Xinhai Lu & Yifeng Tang & Bin Jiang, 2021. "Interaction between Land Financing Strategy and the Implementation Deviation of Local Governments’ Cultivated Land Protection Policy in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, July.
    16. Quanfeng Li & Zhe Dong & Guoming Du & Aizheng Yang, 2021. "Spatial Differentiation of Cultivated Land Use Intensification in Village Settings: A Survey of Typical Chinese Villages," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    17. You, Heyuan & Zhang, Jinrong & Song, Yan, 2022. "Assessing conflict of farmland institutions using credibility theory: Implications for socially acceptable land use," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    18. Anat Tchetchik & Aliza Fleischer & Israel Finkelshtain, 2011. "Agglomeration and Club Goods in the Rural Accommodations Industry," ERSA conference papers ersa10p359, European Regional Science Association.
    19. Chun-Chu Yeh & Crystal Jia-Yi Lin & James Po-Hsun Hsiao & Chin-Huang Huang, 2019. "The Effect of Improving Cycleway Environment on the Recreational Benefits of Bicycle Tourism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-11, September.
    20. Wang, Liye & Zhang, Siyu & Xiong, Qiangqiang & Liu, Yu & Liu, Yanfang & Liu, Yaolin, 2022. "Spatiotemporal dynamics of cropland expansion and its driving factors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: A nuanced analysis at the county scale," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:303-:d:751000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.