IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i1p112-d721381.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of New Agricultural Business Entities on Farmers’ Employment Decision

Author

Listed:
  • Lingjuan Cheng

    (College of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Yilin Cui

    (School of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)

  • Kaifeng Duan

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Wei Zou

    (College of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to explore the influence of new agricultural business entities on farmers’ employment decision and provide reference for improving policies related to new agricultural business entities and farmers’ employment. This paper constructs a theoretical analysis framework of “new agricultural business entities—land transfer and purchase of agricultural socialized services—farmers’ employment decision”, and then empirically tests the impact of new agricultural business entities on farmers’ employment decision by combining the analysis methods of the benchmark regression, propensity score matching and mediation effects. The research shows that: (1) New agricultural business entities are beneficial for promoting farmers’ employment decision. (2) Renting out land and the purchase of agricultural socialized services have a positive and partially mediating effect between the new agricultural business entities and farmers’ employment decision, and the mediating effects of the two paths account for 7.12% and 6.25% of the total effects, respectively. (3) In addition to key variables, personal characteristics of decision-making, family characteristics and production and management characteristics are also key factors that affect farmers’ employment decision. (4) The new agricultural business entities increase the probability of farmers’ employment (with legal contract) and entrepreneurship, and reduce the idle labor force in rural areas. Finally, this study proposes some policy recommendations including establishing a perfect farmland transfer market, developing rural industry properly and improving agricultural socialized service systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Lingjuan Cheng & Yilin Cui & Kaifeng Duan & Wei Zou, 2022. "The Influence of New Agricultural Business Entities on Farmers’ Employment Decision," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:1:p:112-:d:721381
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/1/112/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/1/112/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip Kostov & Sophia Davidova & Alastair Bailey, 2019. "Comparative Efficiency of Family and Corporate Farms: Does Family Labour Matter?," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(1), pages 101-115, February.
    2. Xianqing Ji & Shouying Liu & Jianan Yan & Youyi Li, 2021. "Does Security of Land Operational Rights Matter for the Improvement of Agricultural Production Efficiency under the Collective Ownership in China?," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 29(1), pages 87-108, January.
    3. Lingjuan Cheng & Wei Zou & Kaifeng Duan, 2021. "The Influence of New Agricultural Business Entities on the Economic Welfare of Farmer’s Families," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei Wei & Guanyi Yin & Shuai Xie & Qingzhi Sun & Zhan Zhang & Guanghao Li, 2023. "The Spatio-Temporal Patterns and Influencing Factors of Different New Agricultural Business Entities in China—Based on POI Data from 2012 to 2021," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-26, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Putra Hilmi Prayitno & Sheerad Sahid & Muhammad Hussin, 2022. "Social Capital and Household Economic Welfare: Do Entrepreneurship, Financial and Digital Literacy Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Wei Wei & Guanyi Yin & Shuai Xie & Qingzhi Sun & Zhan Zhang & Guanghao Li, 2023. "The Spatio-Temporal Patterns and Influencing Factors of Different New Agricultural Business Entities in China—Based on POI Data from 2012 to 2021," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-26, July.
    3. Aliaa Dirani & Gumataw Kifle Abebe & Rachel A. Bahn & Giuliano Martiniello & Isam Bashour, 2021. "Exploring climate change adaptation practices and household food security in the Middle Eastern context: a case of small family farms in Central Bekaa, Lebanon," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(4), pages 1029-1047, August.
    4. Qiangqiang Zhang & Jiaying Tian & Jie Zheng & Nazir Muhammad Abdullahi & Xuexi Huo, 2022. "How Does Land Tenure Security Affect Farm Succession? Evidence from Apple Growers in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Yuanfeng Liu & Xinyuan He, 2024. "Unraveling the Institutional Logic in China: an Examination of the Institutional Logic Behind Separation of Ownership, Contract Rights, and Operational Rights," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 13509-13531, September.
    6. Cao, Yueming & Bai, Yunli & Sun, Mingxing & Xu, Xiangbo & Fu, Chao & Zhang, Linxiu, 2022. "Experience and lessons from the implementing of the latest Land Certificated Program in rural China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    7. Chao Hu & Jianping Tao & Donghao Zhang & Damian Adams, 2021. "Price Signal of Tilled Land in Rural China: An Empirically Oriented Transaction Costs Study Based on Contract Theory," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    8. S. C. West & A. W. Mugera & R. S. Kingwell, 2022. "The choice of efficiency benchmarking metric in evaluating firm productivity and viability," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 193-211, April.
    9. Garcia, Luis & Laepple, Doris & Dillon, Emma & Thorne, Fiona, 2020. "The role of hired labor in transient and persistent technical efficiency on Irish dairy farms," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304395, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Wuepper, David & Wimmer, Stefan & Sauer, Johannes, 2020. "Is small family farming more environmentally sustainable? Evidence from a spatial regression discontinuity design in Germany," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    11. Adele Coppola & Alfonso Scardera & Mario Amato & Fabio Verneau, 2020. "Income Levels and Farm Economic Viability in Italian Farms: An Analysis of FADN Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    12. Yuxin Meng & Lu Liu & Qiying Ran, 2022. "Can Urban Green Transformation Reduce the Urban–Rural Income Gap? Empirical Evidence Based on Spatial Durbin Model and Mediation Effect Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    13. Lin Feng & Lingyan Xu & Zhuoyun Zhou & Jianguo Du & Dandan Wang, 2022. "The Influence of Social Preference and Governments’ Strong Reciprocity on Agricultural Green Production Networks under Intensive Management in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-29, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:1:p:112-:d:721381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.