IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i10p1841-d947145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Evaluation of Mountain Landscapes in Beijing Based on Social Media Data

Author

Listed:
  • Tingting Ding

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Wenzhuo Sun

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yuan Wang

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Rui Yu

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xiaoyu Ge

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

An important part of Beijing’s ecological pattern, mountain landscapes are also the most important natural tourist destinations in Beijing. The unique mountain environment in Taihang and Yan Mountains attracts Beijing and foreign tourists alike. Tourists publish travel photos and comments on social media, which provides a new opportunity for a systematic evaluation of these mountain parks based on social media data. To fully understand the developmental status of mountain landscapes in Beijing, this paper comparatively evaluates 45 mountain landscapes in Beijing based on social media data. Using big data capture, semantic network analysis, importance-performance analysis (IPA), etc., it explores the composition of tourist groups in mountain parks, the preferences of the tourist groups, and the relationships between park tourists and different influencing factors, and evaluates the recreational experiences of tourist groups. The development of recreational activities was found to be more important to local tourists than scenic sites for foreign tourists. According to gender differences, women were more interested in recreational experiences than men, while men were more interested in the park’s landscapes. According to the IPA, tourists were satisfied with the overall recreation offered by mountain landscapes. The perceptual experience was dominated by visual perception, followed by smell; touch, hearing, and taste were of minor importance. Using social media data to analyze mountain landscape resources in Beijing can provide useful insights into the advantages of these landscapes under a variety of site conditions, strengthen local mountain resource development and tourism publicity, integrate tourism management and planning resources in a targeted and attractive manner, and enhance ecological leisure services.

Suggested Citation

  • Tingting Ding & Wenzhuo Sun & Yuan Wang & Rui Yu & Xiaoyu Ge, 2022. "Comparative Evaluation of Mountain Landscapes in Beijing Based on Social Media Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-30, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1841-:d:947145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1841/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1841/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Pin-Zheng & Liu, Wan-Yu, 2019. "Assessing management performance of the national forest park using impact range-performance analysis and impact-asymmetry analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 121-138.
    2. Sever, Ivan, 2015. "Importance-performance analysis: A valid management tool?," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 43-53.
    3. Do, Yuno, 2019. "Valuating aesthetic benefits of cultural ecosystem services using conservation culturomics," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Estela Marine-Roig, 2019. "Destination Image Analytics Through Traveller-Generated Content," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fan Liu & Danmei Sun & Yanqin Zhang & Shaoping Hong & Minhua Wang & Jianwen Dong & Chen Yan & Qin Yang, 2022. "Tourist Landscape Preferences in a Historic Block Based on Spatiotemporal Big Data—A Case Study of Fuzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siya Cheng & Zheran Zhai & Wenzhuo Sun & Yuan Wang & Rui Yu & Xiaoyu Ge, 2022. "Research on the Satisfaction of Beijing Waterfront Green Space Landscape Based on Social Media Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Marc Vallverdu-Gordi & Estela Marine-Roig, 2023. "The Role of Graphic Design Semiotics in Environmental Awareness Campaigns," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Eleni Kilipiri & Eugenia Papaioannou & Iordanis Kotzaivazoglou, 2023. "Social Media and Influencer Marketing for Promoting Sustainable Tourism Destinations: The Instagram Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    4. NaHyun Lee & Bong-Seok Kim, 2023. "Differences of Host Country-Destination Image Assessment for International Students According to Risk Perception in COVID-19 Tourism," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    5. Lin, Zhibin & Vlachos, Ilias, 2018. "An advanced analytical framework for improving customer satisfaction: A case of air passengers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 185-195.
    6. Sung-Shun Weng & Yang Liu & Yen-Ching Chuang, 2019. "Reform of Chinese Universities in the Context of Sustainable Development: Teacher Evaluation and Improvement Based on Hybrid Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, October.
    7. Pumpe, Andreas & Vallée, Franz, 2015. "The Total Landed Cost Concept. Begging for Answers," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Operational Excellence in Logistics and Supply Chains: Optimization Methods, Data-driven Approaches and Security Insights. Proceedings of the Hamburg , volume 22, pages 31-54, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    8. Nadir Al Naqbi & Naill Al Momani & Amanda Davies, 2022. "The Influence of Social Media on Perceived Levels of National Security and Crisis: A Case Study of Youth in the United Arab Emirates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Kong, Minjin & Lee, Minhyun & Kang, Hyuna & Hong, Taehoon, 2021. "Development of a framework for evaluating the contents and usability of the building life cycle assessment tool," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    10. Gema Pérez-Tapia & Fernando Almeida-García & Pere Mercadé-Melé, 2021. "The “ Four Core Elements ” as a Measuring Instrument: From Simplicity to Complexity in Tourist Destination," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Torres Matovelle, Pablo & Molina Molina, Gina, 2019. "Evaluation of crowding and tourist satisfaction in the practice of humpback whale - watching, the case of Puerto López - Ecuador," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    12. Yu-Hung Chien & Fang-Yu Chang, 2023. "An importance-performance analysis of teachers’ perception of STEM engineering design education," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    13. Esmailpour, Javad & Aghabayk, Kayvan & Abrari Vajari, Mohammad & De Gruyter, Chris, 2020. "Importance – Performance Analysis (IPA) of bus service attributes: A case study in a developing country," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 129-150.
    14. Jeong-Sil Choi & Se-Young Ju, 2022. "A Study of Food Safety Knowledge for Sustainable Foodservice Management of Childcare Centers in South Korea Using Importance–Performance Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, August.
    15. Chi-Cheng Chen & Jia Wei Chook & Linh Bao Nguyen & Chun-Hung Lee, 2024. "Integrating Locals’ Importance–Performance Perception of Community Resilience into Sustainable Indigenous Tourism Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Min-Pei Lin & Estela Marine-Roig & Nayra Llonch-Molina, 2022. "Gastronomy Tourism and Well-Being: Evidence from Taiwan and Catalonia Michelin-Starred Restaurants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-24, February.
    17. Ping-Heng Tsai & Chia-Chi Hsaio & Yan-Ru Li & Chun-Chieh Lin, 2023. "Clustering Travelers’ Lifestyle Destination Image from Five Asian Traveler-Generated Content," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Olimpia Iuliana Ban & Roxana Hatos & Nicoleta-Georgeta Bugnar & Dinu Sasu & Adela Laura Popa & Andreea-Florina Fora, 2024. "Evaluation of the Quality of Higher Education Services by Revised IPA in the Perspective of Digitization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, April.
    19. Gianluca Goffi & Magdalena Cladera & Linda Osti, 2020. "Sun, Sand, and… Sustainability in Developing Countries from a Tourists’ Perspective. The Case of Punta Cana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, June.
    20. Echaniz, Eneko & Ho, Chinh Q. & Rodriguez, Andres & dell'Olio, Luigi, 2019. "Comparing best-worst and ordered logit approaches for user satisfaction in transit services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 752-769.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1841-:d:947145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.