IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i8p855-d614768.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of an Urban Development Boundary Policy in China Based on the IAD Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaojiao Luo

    (School of Economics, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Wei Wang

    (Business School, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou 310015, China)

  • Yuzhe Wu

    (School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Yi Peng

    (School of Public Administration, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Linlin Zhang

    (Department of Urban-Rural Planning, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

Abstract

Although urban growth control policies are widely adopted to help sustainable development in various countries, including China, few studies have been conducted to investigate the effectiveness and optimization of such policies in Chinese cities. Hangzhou, China, was chosen for this study as the research object, where the local authorities manage the urban sprawl via an urban development boundary policy. The institutional analysis and development (IAD) framework was employed to identify the conflicts between the central government and the local government as well as the developers and homebuyers in the formal/informal stage. The analysis shows that, with the implementation of the policy, problems such as fiscal crises, property inflation, and illegal construction will appear as a result of actors’ interactions. The study also highlights that industrial land transfer inside the boundary should be controlled in a reasonable range and that a land value tax should be introduced during the implementation of the urban development boundary policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaojiao Luo & Wei Wang & Yuzhe Wu & Yi Peng & Linlin Zhang, 2021. "Analysis of an Urban Development Boundary Policy in China Based on the IAD Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:8:p:855-:d:614768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/8/855/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/8/855/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mathur, Shishir, 2019. "Impact of an urban growth boundary across the entire house price spectrum: The two-stage quantile spatial regression approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 88-94.
    2. Cho, Seong-Hoon & Chen, Zhuo & Yen, Steven T. & Eastwood, David B., 2006. "Estimating Effects of an Urban Growth Boundary on Land Development," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 38(2), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Narimah Samat & Mohd Amirul Mahamud & Mou Leong Tan & Mohammad Javad Maghsoodi Tilaki & Yi Lin Tew, 2020. "Modelling Land Cover Changes in Peri-Urban Areas: A Case Study of George Town Conurbation, Malaysia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Gao, Yuan & Tian, Li & Cao, Yandong & Zhou, Lin & Li, Zhibin & Hou, Deyi, 2019. "Supplying social infrastructure land for satisfying public needs or leasing residential land? A study of local government choices in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    5. Gao, Xin & Zhang, Anlu & Sun, Zhanli, 2020. "How regional economic integration influence on urban land use efficiency？ A case study of Wuhan metropolitan area, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    6. Oleksandr Bondar, 2018. "Public Administration In The Field Of Land Use And Protection And State Land Policy In Ukraine: Problems Of Correlation," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(3).
    7. Jeon, Jae Sik, 2019. "How housing market responds to greenbelt relaxation: Case of Seoul Metropolitan Area, South Korea," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 328-334.
    8. Sungjun Kim & Changmu Jung, 2020. "The Influence of Urban Planning-Related Pledge Budget on Local Election Votes: A City Case in Korea," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Chen, Wei & Shen, Yue & Wang, Yanan & Wu, Qun, 2018. "How do industrial land price variations affect industrial diffusion? Evidence from a spatial analysis of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 384-394.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sara Romero-Muñoz & Manuel Alméstar & Teresa Sánchez-Chaparro & Víctor Muñoz Sanz, 2023. "The Impact of Institutional Innovation on a Public Tender: The Case of Madrid Metropolitan Forest," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Jingeng Huo & Zhenqin Shi & Wenbo Zhu & Xin Chen & Hua Xue & Ran Ma & Yanhui Yan, 2022. "Delineation of the Development Boundary of the Central District of Zhengzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Dong Chen & Rongrong Liu & Maoxian Zhou, 2023. "Delineation of Urban Growth Boundary Based on Habitat Quality and Carbon Storage: A Case Study of Weiyuan County in Gansu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chengzhen Song & Qingfang Liu & Jinping Song & Zhengyun Jiang & Zhilin Lu & Yueying Chen, 2022. "Land Use Efficiency in the Yellow River Basin in the Background of China’s Economic Transformation: Spatial-Temporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Wang, Jian & Wu, Qun & Yan, Siqi & Guo, Guancheng & Peng, Shangui, 2020. "China’s local governments breaking the land use planning quota: A strategic interaction perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Zhou, Lin & Tian, Li & Cao, Yandong & Yang, Linchuan, 2021. "Industrial land supply at different technological intensities and its contribution to economic growth in China: A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    4. Zhiyin Wang & Jiansheng Cao, 2021. "Assessing and Predicting the Impact of Multi-Scenario Land Use Changes on the Ecosystem Service Value: A Case Study in the Upstream of Xiong’an New Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Zhen Wang & Xupeng Zhang & Chaozheng Zhang & Qing Yang, 2022. "How Regional Integration Affects Urban Green Development Efficiency: Evidence from Urban Agglomeration in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Ivan A. Kapitonov, 2020. "Transformation of social environment in the application of alternative energy sources," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 7683-7700, December.
    7. Congguo Zhang & Di Yao & Yanlin Zhen & Weiwei Li & Kerun Li, 2022. "Mismatched Relationship between Urban Industrial Land Consumption and Growth of Manufacturing: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-35, August.
    8. Shijin Zhang & Weiwei Zhang & Jie Xu & Yichi Zhang, 2023. "Does the Differentiation of China’s Land Policy Promote Regional Economic Development?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Lisha Pan & Hangang Hu & Xin Jing & Yang Chen & Guan Li & Zhongguo Xu & Yuefei Zhuo & Xueqi Wang, 2022. "The Impacts of Regional Cooperation on Urban Land-Use Efficiency: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Dai, Bing & Gu, Xiaokun & Xie, Boming, 2020. "Policy Framework and Mechanism of Life Cycle Management of Industrial Land (LCMIL) in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    11. Xiao Tian & Jin Liu & Yong Liu, 2022. "How Does the Quality of Junior High Schools Affect Housing Prices? A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on the Admission Reform in Chengdu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Bin Duan & Xuanming Ji, 2021. "Can Carbon Finance Optimize Land Use Efficiency? The Example of China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Policy," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    13. Yin Ma & Minrui Zheng & Xinqi Zheng & Yi Huang & Feng Xu & Xiaoli Wang & Jiantao Liu & Yongqiang Lv & Wenchao Liu, 2023. "Land Use Efficiency Assessment under Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, April.
    14. Yunfei Peng & Fangling Yang & Lingwei Zhu & Ruru Li & Chao Wu & Deng Chen, 2021. "Comparative Analysis of the Factors Influencing Land Use Change for Emerging Industry and Traditional Industry: A Case Study of Shenzhen City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    15. Xinhai Lu & Zhenxing Shi & Jia Li & Junhao Dong & Mingjie Song & Jiao Hou, 2022. "Research on the Impact of Factor Flow on Urban Land Use Efficiency from the Perspective of Urbanization," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, March.
    16. Ouyang, Yanyan & Cai, Hongbo & Yu, Xuefei & Li, Zijian, 2022. "Capitalization of social infrastructure into China's urban and rural housing values: Empirical evidence from Bayesian Model Averaging," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    17. Zhou, Dingyang & Li, Zitong & Wang, Sifei & Tian, Yingying & Zhang, Yu & Jiang, Guanghui, 2021. "How does the newly urban residential built-up density differ across Chinese cities under rapid urban expansion? Evidence from residential FAR and statistical data from 2007 to 2016," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    18. Newburn, David A. & Berck, Peter, 2011. "Growth Management Policies for Exurban and Suburban Development: Theory and an Application to Sonoma County, California," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(3), pages 375-392, December.
    19. Mathur, Shishir, 2020. "Impact of transit stations on house prices across entire price spectrum: A quantile regression approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    20. Anatoliy V Kostruba, 2019. "Termination Of Contractual Obligations In The Civil Code Of Ukraine," Post-Print hal-02371187, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:8:p:855-:d:614768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.