IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i3p279-d513029.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planning Tool Mosaic (PTM): A Platform for Italy, a Country Without a Strategic Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Lorena Fiorini

    (Department of Civil, Construction-Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Francesco Zullo

    (Department of Civil, Construction-Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Alessandro Marucci

    (Department of Civil, Construction-Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Chiara Di Dato

    (Department of Civil, Construction-Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Bernardino Romano

    (Department of Civil, Construction-Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

Abstract

The following work proposes the utilisation of a technical device named “Planning Tool Mosaic” (PTM), defined as a total homogeneous and standardised framework for the principles contained in municipal regulatory plans: the assignment of zoning, legends, and technical rules. The 300,000 km 2 -broad national territory is divided into nearly 8000 municipalities. Each of them refers to a distinct regulatory plan and then to a distinct regulation on local buildings, infrastructure, and social services. This level of planning tool is the one that has most impact on the territory. This highly fragmented scenario should be driven by upper-level regulation. Although protocols and guidelines are in force, they are almost irrelevant compared to the impact of regulation at the local level. This process is a European example of city planning mismanagement that needs to be brought to the broader attention of the European technical/scientific context. The PTM, though intervening when municipal plans are already in effect, introduces an element of social and political transparency to planning before transformative events occur. It also provides a continuous framework on the probable future of territories, thereby overcoming the current opacity with regard to public cognition of future arrangements.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorena Fiorini & Francesco Zullo & Alessandro Marucci & Chiara Di Dato & Bernardino Romano, 2021. "Planning Tool Mosaic (PTM): A Platform for Italy, a Country Without a Strategic Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:279-:d:513029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/3/279/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/3/279/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernardino Romano & Francesco Zullo & Lorena Fiorini & Serena Ciabò & Alessandro Marucci, 2017. "Sprinkling: An Approach to Describe Urbanization Dynamics in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Alex Lord & Mark Tewdwr-Jones, 2014. "Is Planning "Under Attack"? Chronicling the Deregulation of Urban and Environmental Planning in England," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 345-361, February.
    3. Alessandro Marucci & Lorena Fiorini & Chiara Di Dato & Francesco Zullo, 2020. "Marginality Assessment: Computational Applications on Italian Municipalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Luca Di Figlia, 2016. "Turnaround: abandoned villages, from discarded elements of modern Italian society to possible resources," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 278-297, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonio Ledda & Marta Kubacka & Giovanna Calia & Sylwia Bródka & Vittorio Serra & Andrea De Montis, 2023. "Italy vs. Poland: A Comparative Analysis of Regional Planning System Attitudes toward Adaptation to Climate Changes and Green Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Angela Pilogallo & Francesco Scorza, 2022. "Ecosystem Services Multifunctionality: An Analytical Framework to Support Sustainable Spatial Planning in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Francesco Zullo & Gianni Di Pietro & Chiara Cattani & Cristina Montaldi, 2023. "Urban Planning vs. Agricultural Production: A Study on the Po Valley," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-11, April.
    4. Chiara Cattani & Cristina Montaldi & Gianni Di Pietro & Francesco Zullo, 2023. "Effects of Urban Planning on Ecosystem Services: The Umbria Region Seismic Crater," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Zhenhang Cai & Rui Zhu & Emma Ruggiero & Galen Newman & Jennifer A. Horney, 2023. "Calculating the Environmental Impacts of Low-Impact Development Using Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment: A Review of Model Applications," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Bernardino Romano & Francesco Zullo & Lorena Fiorini & Cristina Montaldi, 2022. "Micromunicipality (MM) and Inner Areas in Italy: A Challenge for National Land Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Romano, Bernardino & Zullo, Francesco & Saganeiti, Lucia & Montaldi, Cristina, 2023. "Evaluation of cut-off values in the control of land take in Italy towards the SDGs 2030," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bernardino Romano & Francesco Zullo & Alessandro Marucci & Lorena Fiorini, 2018. "Vintage Urban Planning in Italy: Land Management with the Tools of the Mid-Twentieth Century," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Francesco Zullo & Alessandro Marucci & Lorena Fiorini & Bernardino Romano, 2020. "The Italian Apennines between earthquakes, high naturalness and urban growth," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(4), pages 716-731, May.
    3. Bernardino Romano & Francesco Zullo & Lorena Fiorini & Alessandro Marucci, 2019. "Molecular No Smart-Planning in Italy: 8000 Municipalities in Action throughout the Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Andy Inch & Richard Dunning & Aidan While & Hannah Hickman & Sarah Payne, 2020. "‘The object is to change the heart and soul’: Financial incentives, planning and opposition to new housebuilding in England," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(4), pages 713-732, June.
    5. Katarzyna Kocur-Bera & Karol Szuniewicz, 2021. "Socio-Spatial Aspects of Shrinking Municipalities: A Case Study of the Post-Communist Region of North-East Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Di Pirro, E. & Sallustio, L. & Capotorti, G. & Marchetti, M. & Lasserre, B., 2021. "A scenario-based approach to tackle trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and land use pressure in Central Italy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 448(C).
    7. Brian Pickard & Joshua Gray & Ross Meentemeyer, 2017. "Comparing Quantity, Allocation and Configuration Accuracy of Multiple Land Change Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Wang, Chengchao & Gao, Bidan & Weng, Zudeng & Tian, Ying, 2020. "Primary causes of total hamlet abandonment for different types of hamlets in remote mountain areas of China: A case study of Shouning County, Fujian Province," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    9. Benedetto Manganelli & Beniamino Murgante & Lucia Saganeiti, 2020. "The Social Cost of Urban Sprinkling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Lucia Saganeiti & Angela Pilogallo & Giuseppe Faruolo & Francesco Scorza & Beniamino Murgante, 2020. "Territorial Fragmentation and Renewable Energy Source Plants: Which Relationship?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, February.
    11. Bański Jerzy & Wesołowska Monika, 2020. "Disappearing Villages in Poland – Selected Socioeconomic Processes and Spatial Phenomena," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 221-241, June.
    12. Bernardino Romano & Francesco Zullo & Lorena Fiorini & Cristina Montaldi, 2022. "Micromunicipality (MM) and Inner Areas in Italy: A Challenge for National Land Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    13. Andy Inch, 2018. "‘Opening for business’? Neoliberalism and the cultural politics of modernising planning in Scotland," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(5), pages 1076-1092, April.
    14. Edward Shepherd & Matthew Wargent, 2024. "Embedding the land market: Polanyi, urban planning and regulation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(3), pages 905-926, May.
    15. Bernardino Romano & Lorena Fiorini & Alessandro Marucci, 2019. "Italy without Urban ‘Sprinkling’. A Uchronia for a Country that Needs a Retrofit of Its Urban and Landscape Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.
    16. Kristian Olesen & Helen Carter, 2018. "Planning as a barrier for growth: Analysing storylines on the reform of the Danish Planning Act," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(4), pages 689-707, June.
    17. Nancy Holman & Gabriel M Ahlfeldt, 2015. "No Escape? The Coordination Problem in Heritage Preservation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(1), pages 172-187, January.
    18. Giulia Capotorti & Vera De Lazzari & Marta Alós Ortí, 2019. "Local Scale Prioritisation of Green Infrastructure for Enhancing Biodiversity in Peri-Urban Agroecosystems: A Multi-Step Process Applied in the Metropolitan City of Rome (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, June.
    19. Feitelson, Eran, 2018. "Shifting sands of planning in Israel," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 695-706.
    20. Mell, Ian, 2020. "The impact of austerity on funding green infrastructure: A DPSIR evaluation of the Liverpool Green & Open Space Review (LG&OSR), UK," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:279-:d:513029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.