IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i11p1268-d683458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community Perceptions about Participating in Urban Park Establishment in Ulaanbaatar City, Mongolia

Author

Listed:
  • Bayarmaa Enkhbold

    (Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577, Japan)

  • Kenichi Matsui

    (Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukubai 305-8577, Japan)

Abstract

Urban parks are essential for communities to maintain and improve health, culture, and quality of life. However, Ulaanbaatar, the capital of Mongolia, faces a shortage of urban parks due to overpopulation and unplanned land use. A good community-based strategy can help urban park planners and decision-makers understand residents’ needs. It can also improve livability and the urban environmental conditions at large. This paper attempts to understand residents’ perceptions about participating in urban park establishment and maintenance. As the past studies showed a lack of community participation in urban planning in Ulaanbaatar, it attempts to determine the extent to which residents perceive urban park benefits, the importance of community participation, preferred types of contribution, and willingness to contribution land in establishing urban parks in their neighborhood. In doing so, it identifies socio-demographic factors that influence their willingness to participate and contribute. A total of 600 paper-based questionnaires were randomly distributed among ger and apartment residents, and only 535 were analyzed. The result shows that approximately 73% of the respondents considered community participation very important for establishing urban parks in their neighborhood. Most respondents perceived urban park benefits as playgrounds for children, and relaxation and recreation. Respondents’ education and housing type were found significant in overall willingness to participate in park establishment and maintenance, whereas marital status and land size were observed statistically significant in the willingness of sharing some portions of their lands for park establishment in the ger area.

Suggested Citation

  • Bayarmaa Enkhbold & Kenichi Matsui, 2021. "Community Perceptions about Participating in Urban Park Establishment in Ulaanbaatar City, Mongolia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:11:p:1268-:d:683458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1268/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1268/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marit Rosol, 2010. "Public Participation in Post‐Fordist Urban Green Space Governance: The Case of Community Gardens in Berlin," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 548-563, September.
    2. Myagmartseren Purevtseren & Bazarkhand Tsegmid & Myagmarjav Indra & Munkhnaran Sugar, 2018. "The Fractal Geometry of Urban Land Use: The Case of Ulaanbaatar City, Mongolia," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Chakma Kisinger & Kenichi Matsui, 2021. "Responding to Climate-Induced Displacement in Bangladesh: A Governance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Raven Anderson & Michael Hooper & Aldarsaikhan Tuvshinbat, 2017. "Towers on the steppe: compact city plans and local perceptions of urban densification in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 217-230, April.
    5. Tian Bai & Audrey L. Mayer & William D. Shuster & Guohang Tian, 2018. "The Hydrologic Role of Urban Green Space in Mitigating Flooding (Luohe, China)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dan Cui & Honghong Liu & Ye Xiao & Nana Cui & Jingjing Liu & Dianting Wu, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and the Driving Forces of the Coupling Coordination Degree between Urbanization and Urban Residents’ Livelihood Level in Mongolia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Thomas Krikser & Ingo Zasada & Annette Piorr, 2019. "Socio-Economic Viability of Urban Agriculture—A Comparative Analysis of Success Factors in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-12, April.
    3. Dennis, Matthew & James, Philip, 2017. "Ecosystem services of collectively managed urban gardens: Exploring factors affecting synergies and trade-offs at the site level," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PA), pages 17-26.
    4. White, James T. & Bunn, Christopher, 2017. "Growing in Glasgow: Innovative practices and emerging policy pathways for urban agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 334-344.
    5. Dorota Mantey, 2021. "Objective and Subjective Determinants of Neighborhood Satisfaction in the Context of Retrofitting Suburbs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Marit Rosol & Vincent Béal & Samuel Mössner, 2017. "Greenest cities? The (post-)politics of new urban environmental regimes," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(8), pages 1710-1718, August.
    7. Oona Morrow, 2019. "Community Self-Organizing and the Urban Food Commons in Berlin and New York," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Chiara Certomà & Lorenzo Chelleri & Bruno Notteboom, 2020. "The ‘fluid governance’ of urban public spaces. Insights from informal planning practices in Rome," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(5), pages 976-995, April.
    9. Bayarmaa Enkhbold & Kenichi Matsui, 2022. "A Study on Policy and Institutional Arrangements for Urban Green Space Development in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Szymon Czyża & Karol Szuniewicz & Iwona Cieślak & Andrzej Biłozor & Tomasz Bajerowski, 2023. "An Analysis of the Spatial Development of European Cities Based on Their Geometry and the CORINE Land Cover (CLC) Database," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-21, January.
    11. Arunima Sarkar Basu & Francesco Pilla & Srikanta Sannigrahi & Rémi Gengembre & Antoine Guilland & Bidroha Basu, 2021. "Theoretical Framework to Assess Green Roof Performance in Mitigating Urban Flooding as a Potential Nature-Based Solution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-34, November.
    12. Xiaojian Yu & Zhiqing Zhao, 2021. "Fractal Characteristic Evolution of Coastal Settlement Land Use: A Case of Xiamen, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Nicole Rogge & Insa Theesfeld & Carola Strassner, 2018. "Social Sustainability through Social Interaction—A National Survey on Community Gardens in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Wenbin Luo & Mingming Su, 2018. "A Spatial-Temporal Analysis of Urban Parkland Expansion in China and Practical Implications to Enhance Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Shanshan Chen & Dagmar Haase & Bing Xue & Thilo Wellmann & Salman Qureshi, 2021. "Integrating Quantity and Quality to Assess Urban Green Space Improvement in the Compact City," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Jouni Häkli & Kirsi Pauliina Kallio & Olli Ruokolainen, 2020. "A Missing Citizen? Issue Based Citizenship in City‐Regional Planning," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 876-893, September.
    17. Yuanyuan Yang & Wenhui Zhang & Zhe Liu & Dengfeng Liu & Qiang Huang & Jun Xia, 2023. "Coupling a Distributed Time Variant Gain Model into a Storm Water Management Model to Simulate Runoffs in a Sponge City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.
    18. Peihao Song & Jianhui Guo & Enkai Xu & Audrey L. Mayer & Chang Liu & Jing Huang & Guohang Tian & Gunwoo Kim, 2020. "Hydrological Effects of Urban Green Space on Stormwater Runoff Reduction in Luohe, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-20, August.
    19. Liu, Yang & Kwan, Mei-Po & Wong, Man Sing & Yu, Changda, 2023. "Current methods for evaluating people's exposure to green space: A scoping review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    20. Liviu Neamtu & Adina Claudia Neamtu, 2016. "Green Development For The Cities-Integrated Management," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 134-138, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:11:p:1268-:d:683458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.