IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i10p1091-d657416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diversity Is Not Everything

Author

Listed:
  • Drew A. Scott

    (D.A. Scott, Ronin Institute, 127 Haddon Pl., Montclair, NJ 07043, USA)

  • Kathryn D. Eckhoff

    (Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA)

  • Nicola Lorenz

    (School of Environment and Natural Resources, College of Food, Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA)

  • Richard Dick

    (School of Environment and Natural Resources, College of Food, Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA)

  • Rebecca M. Swab

    (Restoration Ecologist, Granville, OH 43023, USA)

Abstract

Since the passage of legislation in 1977, Appalachian mineland reclamation is typically completed using non-native C 3 grasses and forbs. Alternatively, reclamation with native prairie (C 4 ) grasses and forbs offers a more ecologically friendly alternative that can contribute to native plant conservation and potentially improve soil properties more quickly than shallower rooted C 3 cool-season grasses. We assessed the establishment of native prairie after reclamation, evaluating three treatments for six years after planting—traditional cool season planting, native prairie planted at light density, and native prairie planted at heavy density. All treatments reached the objectives of reclamation—percentage of ground covered by vegetation—within 2 years after planting. All treatments at all sites, except for one site by treatment combination near a forest, showed an increase in plant species richness and Shannon–Wiener diversity in the first four years of reclamation, a peak around 5 years, and subsequent decrease. Little difference in plant richness and Shannon–Wiener diversity among treatments was observed. However, the two native seed mixes quickly diverged from the traditional mix in terms of community structure and diverged further over time, with both native treatments heading towards a more desirable native prairie grassland state, while the traditional mix remained dominated by non-native cool season grasses. The native treatments also exhibited greater increase in microbial biomass and fungi:bacteria ratio over time compared to the traditional mix. Soil organic carbon increased over time regardless of seed mix treatment. Exchangeable base cations and phosphorus generally decreased over time, as expected, regardless of seed mix treatment, likely due to uptake from established plants. Native grassland species were able to establish despite inclusion of some traditional species in the native mix. Native plant establishment likely resulted in benefits including pollinator resources, bird and wildlife habitat, and increased soil health, and we recommend that native prairie mixes be used directly in reclamation moving forward, as they are able to meet reclamation goals while establishing a successful native prairie plant community.

Suggested Citation

  • Drew A. Scott & Kathryn D. Eckhoff & Nicola Lorenz & Richard Dick & Rebecca M. Swab, 2021. "Diversity Is Not Everything," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:10:p:1091-:d:657416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/10/1091/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/10/1091/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bradley J. Cardinale & J. Emmett Duffy & Andrew Gonzalez & David U. Hooper & Charles Perrings & Patrick Venail & Anita Narwani & Georgina M. Mace & David Tilman & David A. Wardle & Ann P. Kinzig & Gre, 2012. "Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity," Nature, Nature, vol. 486(7401), pages 59-67, June.
    2. Lima, Ana T. & Mitchell, Kristen & O’Connell, David W. & Verhoeven, Jos & Van Cappellen, Philippe, 2016. "The legacy of surface mining: Remediation, restoration, reclamation and rehabilitation," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 227-233.
    3. Simon N. Wood, 2003. "Thin plate regression splines," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(1), pages 95-114, February.
    4. Rebecca M. Swab & Nicola Lorenz & Nathan R. Lee & Steven W. Culman & Richard P. Dick, 2020. "From the Ground Up: Prairies on Reclaimed Mine Land—Impacts on Soil and Vegetation," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Simon N. Wood, 2011. "Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 73(1), pages 3-36, January.
    6. Yi Yang & David Tilman & George Furey & Clarence Lehman, 2019. "Soil carbon sequestration accelerated by restoration of grassland biodiversity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-7, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Longhi, Christian & Musolesi, Antonio & Baumont, Catherine, 2014. "Modeling structural change in the European metropolitan areas during the process of economic integration," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 395-407.
    2. Roberto Basile & Luigi Benfratello & Davide Castellani, 2012. "Geoadditive models for regional count data: an application to industrial location," ERSA conference papers ersa12p83, European Regional Science Association.
    3. E. Zanini & E. Eastoe & M. J. Jones & D. Randell & P. Jonathan, 2020. "Flexible covariate representations for extremes," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), August.
    4. Ji, Shujuan & Liu, Xiaojie & Wang, Yuanqing, 2024. "The role of road infrastructures in the usage of bikeshare and private bicycle," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 234-246.
    5. Sarah R. Weiskopf & Forest Isbell & Maria Isabel Arce-Plata & Moreno Di Marco & Mike Harfoot & Justin Johnson & Susannah B. Lerman & Brian W. Miller & Toni Lyn Morelli & Akira S. Mori & Ensheng Weng &, 2024. "Biodiversity loss reduces global terrestrial carbon storage," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Ronald E. Gangnon & Natasha K. Stout & Oguzhan Alagoz & John M. Hampton & Brian L. Sprague & Amy Trentham-Dietz, 2018. "Contribution of Breast Cancer to Overall Mortality for US Women," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 38(1_suppl), pages 24-31, April.
    7. Marra, Giampiero & Wood, Simon N., 2011. "Practical variable selection for generalized additive models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 2372-2387, July.
    8. Basile, Roberto & Durbán, María & Mínguez, Román & María Montero, Jose & Mur, Jesús, 2014. "Modeling regional economic dynamics: Spatial dependence, spatial heterogeneity and nonlinearities," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 229-245.
    9. Feuillet, Thierry & Bulteau, Julie & Dantan, Sophie, 2021. "Modelling context-specific relationships between neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and private car use," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    10. Shailendra Gurjar & Usha Ananthakumar, 2023. "The economics of art: price determinants and returns on investment in Indian paintings," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 50(6), pages 839-859, January.
    11. Gressani, Oswaldo & Lambert, Philippe, 2021. "Laplace approximations for fast Bayesian inference in generalized additive models based on P-splines," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    12. Øystein Sørensen & Anders M. Fjell & Kristine B. Walhovd, 2023. "Longitudinal Modeling of Age-Dependent Latent Traits with Generalized Additive Latent and Mixed Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 456-486, June.
    13. Jennifer F. Bobb & Maricela F. Cruz & Stephen J. Mooney & Adam Drewnowski & David Arterburn & Andrea J. Cook, 2022. "Accounting for spatial confounding in epidemiological studies with individual‐level exposures: An exposure‐penalized spline approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(3), pages 1271-1293, July.
    14. Musolesi Antonio & Mazzanti Massimiliano, 2014. "Nonlinearity, heterogeneity and unobserved effects in the carbon dioxide emissions-economic development relation for advanced countries," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 18(5), pages 521-541, December.
    15. David L. Miller & Richard Glennie & Andrew E. Seaton, 2020. "Understanding the Stochastic Partial Differential Equation Approach to Smoothing," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(1), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Cornelius Fritz & Göran Kauermann, 2022. "On the interplay of regional mobility, social connectedness and the spread of COVID‐19 in Germany," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(1), pages 400-424, January.
    17. Norbert Pfeifer & Miriam Steurer, 2024. "Stabilizing Geo-Spatial Surfaces in Data-Sparse Regions - An Application to Residential Property Prices," Graz Economics Papers 2024-11, University of Graz, Department of Economics.
    18. Scott Tainsky & Brian M. Mills & Jason A. Winfree, 2015. "Further Examination of Potential Discrimination Among MLB Umpires," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 16(4), pages 353-374, May.
    19. Giampiero Marra & Rosalba Radice & Till Bärnighausen & Simon N. Wood & Mark E. McGovern, 2017. "A Simultaneous Equation Approach to Estimating HIV Prevalence With Nonignorable Missing Responses," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(518), pages 484-496, April.
    20. Stefan Sperlich & Raoul Theler, 2015. "Modeling heterogeneity: a praise for varying-coefficient models in causal analysis," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 693-718, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:10:p:1091-:d:657416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.