IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i3p116-d1598008.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution in Performance Evaluation in the Albanian Banking Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Arianit Peci

    (Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Faculty of Economics and Agribusiness, Agricultural University of Tirana, 1025 Tirana, Albania)

  • Blerina Dervishaj

    (Department of Finance and Accounting, Faculty of Economy, “Ismail Qemali” University of Vlora, 9400 Vlorë, Albania)

  • Adis Puška

    (Department of Public Safety, Government of Brčko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina, 76100 Brčko, Bosnia and Herzegovina)

Abstract

The banking sector plays a key role in the economic, social, and political development of a country. The study of the financial performance of banks is essential for investors, creditors, and other interested parties. The aim of this research was to rank the second-tier banks in Albania by financial performance using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision model (fuzzy MCDM). For the ranking of banks, eight financial criteria were taken into account during the years 2020, 2021, and 2022 for 11 banks in the Albanian banking sector. Based on the selected indicators, a decision-making model was created. The Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods were used in this research. The results of the FAHP method showed that the most important indicators are Equity and EBT. The results of the TOPSIS method showed that Banka Kombëtare Tregtare (BKT) had the best indicators for the observed years. The contribution of this research is in understanding the financial operations of banks in Albania.

Suggested Citation

  • Arianit Peci & Blerina Dervishaj & Adis Puška, 2025. "Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution in Performance Evaluation in the Albanian Banking Sector," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-23, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:116-:d:1598008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/3/116/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/3/116/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammad Rezaei & Saeedeh Ketabi, 2016. "Ranking the Banks through Performance Evaluation by Integrating Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS Methods: A Study of Iranian Private Banks," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 6(3), pages 19-30, July.
    2. Mohammad Reza Hassanzadeh & Changiz Valmohammadi, 2021. "Evaluation and ranking of the banks and financial institutes using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS techniques," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 40(3), pages 297-317.
    3. Pawan Kumar & Deergha Sharma, 2023. "Benchmarking the financial performance of Indian commercial banks by a hybrid MCDM approach," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(3), pages 285-309.
    4. Houssein Ballouk & Sami Ben Jabeur & Sabri Boubaker & Salma Mefteh-Wali, 2024. "The effect of social media on bank performance: an fsQCA approach," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 477-495, March.
    5. Ecer, Fatih & Pamucar, Dragan, 2022. "A novel LOPCOW‐DOBI multi‐criteria sustainability performance assessment methodology: An application in developing country banking sector," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    6. Phung Mai Lan & Nguyen Khac Minh & Pham Van Khanh & Nguyen Thien Luan, 2024. "The efficiency and the stability of efficiency rankings of Vietnamese commercial banks through mergers and acquisitions from 2008 to 2018," Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(4), pages 581-604.
    7. C?Han Çaliko?Lu & Aleksandra ?Uczak, 2024. "Multidimensional assessment of sdi and hdi using topsis and bilinear ordering," International Journal of Economic Sciences, European Research Center, vol. 13(2), pages 116-128, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenyao Niu & Yuan Rong & Liying Yu & Lu Huang, 2022. "A Novel Hybrid Group Decision Making Approach Based on EDAS and Regret Theory under a Fermatean Cubic Fuzzy Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-30, August.
    2. Marco Locurcio & Francesco Tajani & Pierluigi Morano & Debora Anelli & Benedetto Manganelli, 2021. "Credit Risk Management of Property Investments through Multi-Criteria Indicators," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Yüksel Akay Ünvan & Cansu Ergenç, 2022. "Financial Performance Analysis with the Fuzzy COPRAS and Entropy-COPRAS Approaches," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 59(4), pages 1577-1605, April.
    4. Shivani Guru & D. K. Mahalik, 2019. "A comparative study on performance measurement of Indian public sector banks using AHP-TOPSIS and AHP-grey relational analysis," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(4), pages 1213-1239, December.
    5. Shiva Ghasempour & Mohamadjavad Salami, 2016. "Ranking Iranian Private Banks Based on the CAMELS Model Using the AHP Hybrid Approach and TOPSIS," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 6(4), pages 52-62, October.
    6. Işık, Özcan & Shabir, Mohsin & Moslem, Sarbast, 2024. "A hybrid MCDM framework for assessing urban competitiveness: A case study of European cities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:116-:d:1598008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.