IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i2p55-d1577469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Auditors’ Life Cycle in Clients and Auditor Independence

Author

Listed:
  • Emeka T. Nwaeze

    (Department of Accounting, The University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA)

Abstract

This study hypothesizes that, in client firms, audit teams or auditors go through life cycle phases— entry , adjustment , and recursion —that give rise to distinct patterns of independence across time. The life cycle paradigm depicts the auditors as facing pressures during entry to adhere strongly to their professional mandate, including the strict exercise of independence. The result is tense auditor–client relations and an increased likelihood of auditor turnover during the entry phase. Auditors that gain entry will “loosen up” and adjust their stance on independence due to the reduced entry pressures. As a result, the adjustment phase will witness a decline in auditor–client disagreements and a lower likelihood of auditor turnover. Over protracted periods, the audit process becomes tightly structured and recursive; the repetitive nature of the processes leads to audit fatigue, less attention to the independence mandate, and greater reliance on clients. The phenomenon portends an even further decline in auditor–client tension and a diminished likelihood of auditor turnover. These predictions are tested using auditor turnovers following auditor–client disputes as surrogates for auditor independence. The results confirm the life cycle phenomena and show that the level of auditor independence peaks during the early years of the auditors’ tenure and declines afterwards.

Suggested Citation

  • Emeka T. Nwaeze, 2025. "Auditors’ Life Cycle in Clients and Auditor Independence," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-26, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:55-:d:1577469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/2/55/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/2/55/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Danny Miller & Jamal Shamsie, 2001. "Learning across the life cycle: Experimentation and performance among the hollywood studio heads," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(8), pages 725-745, August.
    2. Arrunada, Benito & Paz-Ares, Candido, 1997. "Mandatory rotation of company auditors: A critical examination," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 31-61, March.
    3. Chih†Ying Chen & Chan†Jane Lin & Yu†Chen Lin, 2008. "Audit Partner Tenure, Audit Firm Tenure, and Discretionary Accruals: Does Long Auditor Tenure Impair Earnings Quality?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(2), pages 415-445, June.
    4. Smith, David B. & Nichols, Donald R., 1982. "A market test of investor reaction to disagreements," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 109-120, October.
    5. T. Moreau & J. O'Quigley & M. Mesbah, 1985. "A Global Goodness‐Of‐Fit Statistic for the Proportional Hazards Model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 34(3), pages 212-218, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gómez Aguilar, Nieves & Biedma López, Estíbaliz & Ruiz Barbadillo, Emiliano, 2018. "El efecto de la rotación de socio en la calidad de la auditoría," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 7-18.
    2. Quick, Reiner & Schmidt, Florian, 2018. "Do audit firm rotation, auditor retention, and joint audits matter? – An experimental investigation of bank directors' and institutional investors' perceptions," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-21.
    3. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    4. Nieves Carrera & Nieves Gómez‐Aguilar & Christopher Humphrey & Emiliano Ruiz‐Barbadillo, 2007. "Mandatory audit firm rotation in Spain: a policy that was never applied," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(5), pages 671-701, September.
    5. Chang, Yu-Shan & Chiang, Chia-Yu & Liu, Li-Lin (Sunny) & Xie, Xinmei (Lucy), 2019. "Audit partner independence and business affiliation: evidence from Taiwan," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Alzoubi, Ebraheem Saleem Salem, 2018. "Audit quality, debt financing, and earnings management: Evidence from Jordan," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 69-84.
    7. Jeong, Nara & Kim, Nari & Arthurs, Jonathan D., 2021. "The CEO’s tenure life cycle, corporate social responsibility and the moderating role of the CEO’s political orientation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 464-474.
    8. Mehdi Nekhili & Fahim Javed & Haithem Nagati, 2022. "Audit Partner Gender, Leadership and Ethics: The Case of Earnings Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(2), pages 233-260, May.
    9. Persakis, Anthony & Iatridis, George Emmanuel, 2016. "Audit quality, investor protection and earnings management during the financial crisis of 2008: An international perspective," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 73-101.
    10. Marco Cucculelli, 2018. "Firm age and the probability of product innovation. Do CEO tenure and product tenure matter?," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 153-179, January.
    11. Andrew B. Jackson & Michael Moldrich & Peter Roebuck, 2008. "Mandatory audit firm rotation and audit quality," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(5), pages 420-437, May.
    12. Liu, Jing-Yue & Lei, Quan & Li, Ruojin & Zhang, Yue-Jun, 2024. "Resistance or motivation? Impact of climate risk on corporate greenwashing: An empirical study of Chinese enterprises," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    13. Isabel‐Maria García‐Sánchez & Nazim Hussain & Sana Akbar Khan & Jennifer Martínez‐Ferrero, 2020. "Managerial entrenchment, corporate social responsibility, and earnings management," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1818-1833, July.
    14. Oliver Lukason & María-del-Mar Camacho-Miñano, 2020. "Corporate Governance Characteristics of Private SMEs’ Annual Report Submission Violations," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Kumar, Nikeel Nishkar & Mohnot, Rajesh, 2024. "Nonlinear effect of CEO tenure on stock price crash risk," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    16. Orens, Raf & Reheul, Anne-Mie, 2011. "Do CEO Demographics Explain Cash Holdings in SMEs?," Working Papers 2011/35, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management.
    17. Abdulkadir Musa Badara & Tan Fee Yean, 2013. "Leadership Succession and Strategic Change in Nigerian Commercial Banks," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 4(7), pages 205-208.
    18. Liao, Fang-nan & Zhang, Chuancai & Zhang, Jin-jin & Yan, Xiang & Chen, Tian-xiang, 2024. "Hyperbole or reality? The effect of auditors' AI education on audit report timeliness," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    19. Ya-Fang Wang, 2020. "New Insights on Audit Quality," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH), Kavala Campus, Greece, vol. 13(1), pages 21-28, April.
    20. Bryan, David B. & Mason, Terry W., 2017. "Executive tournament incentives and audit fees," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 30-45.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:55-:d:1577469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.