IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i2p54-d1575876.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Executive Religiosity and Disclosure Tone Ambiguity of Annual Reports

Author

Listed:
  • Toufiq Nazrul

    (Schroder Family School of Business Administration, College of Business and Engineering, University of Evansville, Evansville, IN 47722, USA)

  • Rania Mousa

    (Schroder Family School of Business Administration, College of Business and Engineering, University of Evansville, Evansville, IN 47722, USA)

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of C-suite executive religiosity on the disclosure tone ambiguity of corporate annual reports. The paper utilizes executive-level religiosity, disclosure tone, and financial data from a sample of 2515 publicly listed U.S. corporations. It applies fixed-effect regression analysis to show that the presence of religious executives within the C-suite team reduces the disclosure tone ambiguity of annual reports, as evidenced by a reduction in the number of negative and uncertain words within corporate annual reports. Subsample analyses show that religious CEOs and CFOs in the C-suite primarily drive the main findings, which is consistent with their heightened control over corporate annual report preparation processes post-SOX. The main finding holds across multiple robustness tests and suggests that the individual religiosity of C-suite executives can be an important determinant of a company’s disclosure tone-related choices. By utilizing the measure of executive-level religiosity, this study directly addresses recent calls for further research to examine additional personal and psychological factors beyond executive-level narcissism and political ideology that can influence top management personnel’s corporate disclosure tone-related choices. This study contributes to the literature by examining the influence of individual executive-level religiosity on the tonal sentiment of corporate communications, as represented by corporate annual reports.

Suggested Citation

  • Toufiq Nazrul & Rania Mousa, 2025. "Executive Religiosity and Disclosure Tone Ambiguity of Annual Reports," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:54-:d:1575876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/2/54/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/2/54/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Del Gaudio, Belinda L. & Megaravalli, Amith V. & Sampagnaro, Gabriele & Verdoliva, Vincenzo, 2020. "Mandatory disclosure tone and bank risk-taking: Evidence from Europe," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    2. Li, Feng, 2008. "Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(2-3), pages 221-247, August.
    3. Ruihao Ke & Meng Li & Zhejia Ling & Yuan Zhang, 2019. "Social Connections Within Executive Teams and Management Forecasts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 439-457, January.
    4. MD ASIF UL ALAM & Erik Devos & Zifeng Feng, 2023. "Firm reaction to geopolitical crises: Evidence from the Russia‐Ukraine conflict," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 46(S1), pages 163-182, December.
    5. Angela K. Davis & Isho Tama†Sweet, 2012. "Managers’ Use of Language Across Alternative Disclosure Outlets: Earnings Press Releases versus MD&A," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 804-837, September.
    6. Jiang, Feng & John, Kose & Li, C. Wei & Qian, Yiming, 2018. "Earthly Reward to the Religious: Religiosity and the Costs of Public and Private Debt," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(5), pages 2131-2160, October.
    7. Cheng, Lin & Jin, Qinglu & Ma, Hui, 2023. "Tone emphasis and insider trading," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    8. Shroff, Nemit & Verdi, Rodrigo S. & Yost, Benjamin P., 2017. "When does the peer information environment matter?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 183-214.
    9. Beibei Yan & Özgür Arslan-Ayaydin & James Thewissen & Wouter Torsin, 2021. "Does managerial ability affect disclosure? Evidence from earnings press releases," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(2), pages 192-226, February.
    10. Özgür Arslan‐Ayaydin & James Thewissen & Wouter Torsin, 2021. "Disclosure tone management and labor unions," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1-2), pages 102-147, January.
    11. Li, Jingyu & Guo, Ce & Lv, Sijia & Xie, Qiwei & Zheng, Xiaolong, 2024. "Financial fraud detection for Chinese listed firms: Does managers' abnormal tone matter?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    12. Yu Chen & Xiaoyan Chu & Jung Chul Park & Jared S. Soileau, 2022. "CEO religious university affiliation and financial reporting quality," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(1), pages 417-468, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elshandidy, Tamer & Kamel, Hany, 2024. "Tone of narrative disclosures and earnings management: UK evidence," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    2. Qian Wang & Duowen Wu & Lina Yan, 2021. "Effect of positive tone in MD&A disclosure on capital structure adjustment speed: evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5809-5845, December.
    3. Kim, Jongkyum & Lim, Jee-Hae & Yoon, Kyunghee, 2022. "How do the content, format, and tone of Twitter-based corporate disclosure vary depending on earnings performance?," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    4. Bui, Dien Giau & Chen, Yehning & Chen, Yan-Shing & Lin, Chih-Yung, 2023. "Managerial ability and financial statement disaggregation decisions," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    5. Muhammad Farhan Malik & Yuan George Shan & Jamie Yixing Tong, 2022. "Do auditors price litigious tone?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1715-1760, April.
    6. Boone, Jeff & Hao, Jie & Linthicum, Cheryl & Pham, Viet, 2024. "Impression management strategy — The relationship between accounting narrative thematic bias and financial graph distortion," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(4).
    7. Vismaya Gangadharan & Lakshmi Padmakumari, 2024. "Fogging the firm performance: an empirical examination of the annual report readability in India," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(2), pages 211-226, June.
    8. Yin, Shiyan & Chevapatrakul, Thanaset & Yao, Kai, 2022. "The causal effect of improved readability of financial reporting on stock price crash risk: Evidence from the Plain Writing Act of 2010," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    9. Berkin, Anil & Aerts, Walter & Van Caneghem, Tom, 2023. "Feasibility analysis of machine learning for performance-related attributional statements," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    10. Yinju Nie & Ming Jia, 2021. "The power of crowds: can minority shareholder activism promote management earnings forecast accuracy," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(5), pages 6333-6385, December.
    11. Ingrid E. Fisher & Margaret R. Garnsey & Mark E. Hughes, 2016. "Natural Language Processing in Accounting, Auditing and Finance: A Synthesis of the Literature with a Roadmap for Future Research," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(3), pages 157-214, July.
    12. Durnev, Art & Mangen, Claudine, 2020. "The spillover effects of MD&A disclosures for real investment: The role of industry competition," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1).
    13. Johan Maharjan & Seung Won Lee, 2022. "Short‐selling pressure and year‐over‐year MD&A modifications," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 3513-3562, September.
    14. Alexandros Garefalakis & Augustinos Dimitras, 2020. "Looking back and forging ahead: the weighting of ESG factors," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 151-189, November.
    15. Dyer, Travis A. & Glaeser, Stephen & Lang, Mark H. & Sprecher, Caroline, 2024. "The effect of patent disclosure quality on innovation," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(2).
    16. Allee, Kristian D. & Do, Chuong & Sterin, Mikhail, 2021. "Product market competition, disclosure framing, and casting in earnings conference calls," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(1).
    17. Jaeschke, Reemda & Lopatta, Kerstin & Yi, Cheong, 2018. "Managers’ use of language in corrupt firms’ financial disclosures: Evidence from FCPA violators," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 170-192.
    18. Wanli Li & Tiantian Yan & Yue Li & Ziqiao Yan, 2023. "Earnings management and CSR report tone: Evidence from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1883-1902, July.
    19. Kristian D. Allee & Matthew D. Deangelis, 2015. "The Structure of Voluntary Disclosure Narratives: Evidence from Tone Dispersion," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 241-274, May.
    20. Asay, H. Scott & Libby, Robert & Rennekamp, Kristina M., 2018. "Do features that associate managers with a message magnify investors’ reactions to narrative disclosures?," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 68, pages 1-14.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:54-:d:1575876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.