IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i2p47-d1573668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business Strategy and Auditor Report Lag: Do Board Characteristics Matter? Evidence from an Emerging Market

Author

Listed:
  • Aref M. Eissa

    (Accounting Department, Majmaah University, Al Majma’ah 15341, Saudi Arabia
    Faculty of Commerce, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt)

  • Ahmed Diab

    (Accounting Department, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 12435, Saudi Arabia
    Faculty of Commerce, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62521, Egypt)

  • Arafat Hamdy

    (Accounting Department, Majmaah University, Al Majma’ah 15341, Saudi Arabia
    Faculty of Commerce, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62521, Egypt)

Abstract

This study investigates the association between business strategy and audit report lag (ARL). In addition, it reveals the moderating influence of board characteristics on this relationship. We used data collected from Egyptian firms listed on EGX100 during the period from 2014 to 2019, which were analyzed using ordinary least squares and binary logistic regression models. Our study revealed a decrease in ARL for firms adopting cost leadership or differentiation strategies. In addition, we found that ARL decreased for cost leadership firms with a higher percentage of non-executive director and board meetings. Moreover, ARL decreased for firms adopting a differentiation strategy with a higher percentage of non-executive directors. This study contributes to the literature on the potential factors affecting the link between business strategy and the quality of financial reporting by focusing on ARL, which is rarely examined in the literature, especially in emerging markets such as Egypt. The findings of this study are valuable to investors, auditors, corporate management, and other stakeholders, who should consider particular board attributes to better predict ARL and ensure the effective adoption and implementation of business strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Aref M. Eissa & Ahmed Diab & Arafat Hamdy, 2025. "Business Strategy and Auditor Report Lag: Do Board Characteristics Matter? Evidence from an Emerging Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:47-:d:1573668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/2/47/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/2/47/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haniffa, R.M. & Cooke, T.E., 2005. "The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 391-430.
    2. Klein, April, 1998. "Firm Performance and Board Committee Structure," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 41(1), pages 275-303, April.
    3. Mohamed A.K. Basuony & Ehab K.A. Mohamed & Mostaq M. Hussain & Omar K. Marie, 2016. "Board characteristics, ownership structure and audit report lag in the Middle East," International Journal of Corporate Governance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 180-205.
    4. Rusmin Rusmin & John Evans, 2017. "Audit quality and audit report lag: case of Indonesian listed companies," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(2), pages 191-210, May.
    5. Mohamed Hessian & Alaa Mansour Zalata & Khaled Hussainey, 2024. "The effect of non-audit fees on interest payments classification shifting: does internal governance and firm financial well-being matter?," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(1), pages 57-89, May.
    6. Ahmed Diab & Mohamed Marie & Adel Elgharbawy & Israa Elbendary, 2023. "The effect of political risk and corporate governance on bank stability in the MENA region: Did the Arab Spring uprisings matter?," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 2174207-217, December.
    7. Salim, Ruhul & Arjomandi, Amir & Seufert, Juergen Heinz, 2016. "Does corporate governance affect Australian banks' performance?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 113-125.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Haris & Hongxing Yao & Gulzara Tariq & Hafiz Mustansar Javaid & Qurat Ul Ain, 2019. "Corporate Governance, Political Connections, and Bank Performance," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-37, October.
    2. Nigel Driffield & Jun Du & Jan Godsell & Mark Hart & Katiuscia Lavoratori & Steven Roper & Irina Surdu & Wanrong Zhang, 2021. "Understanding productivity:Organisational Capital perspectives," Working Papers 013, The Productivity Institute.
    3. Husaini, 2019. "The Substitution Role of Audit Committee Effectiveness and Audit Quality in Explaining Audit Report Lag," GATR Journals afr171, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    4. Lu, Yun & Ntim, Collins G. & Zhang, Qingjing & Li, Pingli, 2022. "Board of directors’ attributes and corporate outcomes: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    5. Charlie Weir & Oleksandr Talavera & Alexander Muravyev, 2011. "The Return on Human Capital: the Case of UK Non-executive Directors that are also Executive Directors," University of East Anglia Applied and Financial Economics Working Paper Series 029, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    6. David Hillier & Patrick McColgan, 2008. "An analysis of majority owner‐managed companies in the UK," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(4), pages 603-623, December.
    7. Rubén Chavarín, 2020. "Risk governance, banks affiliated to business groups, and foreign ownership," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 1-37, March.
    8. Martin Kyere & Marcel Ausloos, 2021. "Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 1871-1885, April.
    9. Degl’Innocenti, Marta & Matousek, Roman & Sevic, Zeljko & Tzeremes, Nickolaos G., 2017. "Bank efficiency and financial centres: Does geographical location matter?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 188-198.
    10. Goergen, Marc & Manjon, Miguel C. & Renneboog, Luc, 2008. "Recent developments in German corporate governance," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 175-193, September.
    11. Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Luis Rodríguez-Domínguez & Isabel Gallego-Álvarez, 2013. "CEO qualities and codes of ethics," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 295-312, April.
    12. Mohammad Ziaul Hoque & MD. Rabiul Islam & Mohammad Nurul Azam, 2013. "Board Committee Meetings and Firm Financial Performance: An Investigation of Australian Companies," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 13(4), pages 503-528, December.
    13. Vafeas, Nikos & Vlittis, Adamos, 2019. "Board executive committees, board decisions, and firm value," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 43-63.
    14. Marco Allegrini & Giulio Greco, 2013. "Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure: evidence from Italian Listed Companies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(1), pages 187-216, February.
    15. Serhat Yuksel & Hasan Dincer & Senol Emir, 2017. "Comparing the performance of Turkish deposit banks by using DEMATEL, Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) and MOORA approaches," World Journal of Applied Economics, WERI-World Economic Research Institute, vol. 3(2), pages 26-47, December.
    16. Trang Cam Hoang & Indra Abeysekera & Shiguang Ma, 2018. "Board Diversity and Corporate Social Disclosure: Evidence from Vietnam," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(3), pages 833-852, September.
    17. Lee, Gilsoo & Cho, Sam Yul & Arthurs, Jonathan & Lee, Eun Kyung, 2020. "Celebrity CEO, identity threat, and impression management: Impact of celebrity status on corporate social responsibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 69-84.
    18. Benjamin E. Hermalin & Michael S. Weisbach, 2003. "Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: a survey of the economic literature," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 9(Apr), pages 7-26.
    19. repec:tur:wpaper:9 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Engy Mohsen El Hawary & Iman Mamdouh Arafa, 2018. "Studying the Effect of Stakeholders on the Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility by Banks: Evidence from Egypt," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 7(4), pages 200-200, November.
    21. John Becker-Blease & Afshad Irani, 2008. "Do corporate governance attributes affect adverse selection costs? Evidence from seasoned equity offerings," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 281-296, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:47-:d:1573668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.