IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i1p26-d1564220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges of Artificial Intelligence for the Prevention and Identification of Bankruptcy Risk in Financial Institutions: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Luis-Javier Vásquez-Serpa

    (Facultad de Ingeniería de Sistemas e Informática, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (UNMSM), Lima 15081, Peru)

  • Ciro Rodríguez

    (Facultad de Ingeniería de Sistemas e Informática, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (UNMSM), Lima 15081, Peru)

  • Jhelly-Reynaluz Pérez-Núñez

    (Facultad de Ingeniería de Sistemas e Informática, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (UNMSM), Lima 15081, Peru)

  • Carlos Navarro

    (Facultad de Ingeniería de Sistemas e Informática, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (UNMSM), Lima 15081, Peru)

Abstract

The identification and prediction of financial bankruptcy has gained relevance due to its impact on economic and financial stability. This study performs a systematic review of artificial intelligence (AI) models used in bankruptcy prediction, evaluating their performance and relevance using the PRISMA and PICOC frameworks. Traditional models such as random forest, logistic regression, KNN, and neural networks are analyzed, along with advanced techniques such as Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), convolutional neural networks (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), hybrid models, and ensemble methods such as bagging and boosting. The findings highlight that, although traditional models are useful for their simplicity and low computational cost, advanced techniques such as LSTM and XGBoost stand out for their high accuracy, sometimes exceeding 99%. However, these techniques present significant challenges, such as the need for large volumes of data and high computational resources. This paper identifies strengths and limitations of these approaches and analyses their practical implications, highlighting the superiority of AI in terms of accuracy, timeliness, and early detection compared to traditional financial ratios, which remain essential tools. In conclusion, the review proposes approaches that integrate scalability and practicality, offering predictive solutions tailored to real financial contexts with limited resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis-Javier Vásquez-Serpa & Ciro Rodríguez & Jhelly-Reynaluz Pérez-Núñez & Carlos Navarro, 2025. "Challenges of Artificial Intelligence for the Prevention and Identification of Bankruptcy Risk in Financial Institutions: A Systematic Review," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-34, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:26-:d:1564220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/1/26/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/1/26/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Birchler, Urs W, 2000. "Bankruptcy Priority for Bank Deposits: A Contract Theoretic Explanation," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 13(3), pages 813-840.
    2. Sarbjit Singh Oberoi & Sayan Banerjee, 2023. "Bankruptcy Prediction of Indian Banks Using Advanced Analytics," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 22-41.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Urs W. Birchler & Diana Hancock, 2003. "What does the yield on subordinated bank debt measure?," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2004-19, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    2. Urs W. Birchler, 2000. "Are banks excessively monitored?," Working Papers 00.14, Swiss National Bank, Study Center Gerzensee.
    3. Garcia-Appendini, Emilia & Gatti, Stefano & Nocera, Giacomo, 2023. "Does asset encumbrance affect bank risk? Evidence from covered bonds," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    4. Kahn, Charles M. & Santos, Joao A.C., 2005. "Allocating bank regulatory powers: Lender of last resort, deposit insurance and supervision," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(8), pages 2107-2136, November.
    5. Thaer Alhalabi & Vítor Castro & Justine Wood, 2023. "Bank dividend payout policy and debt seniority: Evidence from US Banks," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(5), pages 285-340, December.
    6. Spiros Bougheas & Alan Kirman, 2018. "Systemic risk and the optimal seniority structure of banking liabilities," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(1), pages 47-54, January.
    7. Spiros Bougheas & Alan Kirman, 2016. "Bank Insolvencies, Priority Claims and Systemic Risk," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, in: Pasquale Commendatore & Mariano Matilla-García & Luis M. Varela & Jose S. Cánovas (ed.), Complex Networks and Dynamics, pages 195-208, Springer.
    8. Marvin Goodfriend & Jeffrey M. Lacker, 1999. "Limited commitment and central bank lending," Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, issue Fall, pages 1-27.
    9. Pagès, H. & Santos, J., 2002. "Optimal Supervisory Policies and Depositor-Preferences Laws," Working papers 91, Banque de France.
    10. Francis, Bill & Hasan, Iftekhar & Liu, LiuLing & Wang, Haizhi, 2019. "Senior debt and market discipline: Evidence from bank-to-bank loans," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 170-182.
    11. Kevin Davis, 2020. "Regulatory changes to bank liability structures: implications for deposit insurance design," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 95-106, March.
    12. Piotr Danisewicz & Danny McGowan & Enrico Onali & Klaus Schaeck, 2018. "Debt Priority Structure, Market Discipline, and Bank Conduct," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 31(11), pages 4493-4555.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:26-:d:1564220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.