IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i9p398-d1472317.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Climate-Related Regulations and Financial Markets: A Meta-Analytic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Linh Tu Ho

    (Department of Financial and Business Systems, Faculty of Agribusiness & Commerce, Lincoln University, Christchurch 7647, New Zealand
    Centre of Excellence in Transformative Agribusiness, Lincoln University, Christchurch 7647, New Zealand)

  • Christopher Gan

    (Department of Financial and Business Systems, Faculty of Agribusiness & Commerce, Lincoln University, Christchurch 7647, New Zealand)

  • Zhenzhen Zhao

    (Department of Financial and Business Systems, Faculty of Agribusiness & Commerce, Lincoln University, Christchurch 7647, New Zealand)

Abstract

Countries are confronting climate change using climate-related regulations that require firms and investors to disclose their green strategies and activities. Using the Meta-Analysis Structural Equation Modeling (MASEM) technique, this study evaluates the relationship between climate-related regulations and financial markets. The meta-regression analysis is conducted based on the outcomes of 52 empirical studies screened from 143 relevant articles. The results show the predictive power of the climate-related disclosure (CRD) laws and environmental regulations (ERs) on financial performance across all studies. ERs create mixed impacts on the equity market and support the debt market. Firm value is affected by ERs either negatively or positively. Methodologies and risk-related factors (market, industry, and firm risks) are important in explaining the relationships between ER/CRD and financial performance. The more developed the market, the less the impact of ERs and CRD on the equity market. Considering industry risk is recommended because different industries are exposed to changes in policies differently. The ER/CRD–firm value relationship is affected by all market, industry, and firm risks. The downside effect of mandatory CRD on the equity market suggests that policy makers, firms, and investors should be cautious in passing a new CRD regulation for transformation towards a sustainable economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Linh Tu Ho & Christopher Gan & Zhenzhen Zhao, 2024. "Climate-Related Regulations and Financial Markets: A Meta-Analytic Literature Review," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:9:p:398-:d:1472317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/9/398/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/9/398/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shao, Hanhua & Wang, Yuansheng & Wang, Yao & Li, Yuanjia, 2022. "Green credit policy and stock price crash risk of heavily polluting enterprises: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 271-287.
    2. Freedman, Martin & Jaggi, Bikki, 1982. "Pollution disclosures, pollution performance and economic performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 167-176.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Omaima A.G. Hassan & Peter Romilly, 2018. "Relations between corporate economic performance, environmental disclosure and greenhouse gas emissions: New insights," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 893-909, November.
    2. Binh Hoang Duc & Khang Do Ba, 2017. "Business responses to climate change: strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in Vietnam," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 596-620, August.
    3. Charles H. Cho & Jonathan Maurice & Emmanuelle Nègre & Marie-Anne Verdier, 2016. "Is environmental disclosure good for the environment? A meta-analysis and research agenda," Post-Print halshs-01369422, HAL.
    4. Duygu Turker, 2009. "Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility: A Scale Development Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(4), pages 411-427, April.
    5. Gao, Yihong & Gao, Jiayan & Li, Haili, 2024. "Green credit regulation and market efficiency: A perspective of irrational trading," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 199-219.
    6. Samy Garas & Osama El-Temtamy, 2020. "The “simultaneous cycle” between corporate social responsibility and firms’ financial performance," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(2), pages 39-50, September.
    7. Simona Galletta & Sebastiano Mazzù & Valeria Naciti, 2021. "Banks' business strategy and environmental effectiveness: The monitoring role of the board of directors and the managerial incentives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2656-2670, July.
    8. Pham, Hanh Song Thi & Tran, Hien Thi, 2020. "CSR disclosure and firm performance: The mediating role of corporate reputation and moderating role of CEO integrity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 127-136.
    9. Ho-Tan-Phat Phan & Francesco De Luca & Lea Iaia, 2020. "The “Walk” towards the UN Sustainable Development Goals: Does Mandated “Talk” through NonFinancial Disclosure Affect Companies’ Financial Performance?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Jung-Fa Tsai & Phi-Hung Nguyen & Ming-Hua Lin & Duy-Van Nguyen & Hsu-Hao Lin & Anh-Tuan Ngo, 2021. "Impacts of Environmental Certificate and Pollution Abatement Equipment on SMEs’ Performance: An Empirical Case in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, August.
    11. Ariel H. Fambeu, 2019. "Peer Effect and Environmental Responsibility of Enterprises in a Sub-Saharan African Country," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(2), pages 1084-1094.
    12. Ren, Yangqiu & Hu, Guoliu & Wan, Qing, 2024. "Environmental Protection tax and diversified transition of heavily polluting enterprises: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1570-1592.
    13. Alicia Fernanda Galindo-Manrique & Esteban Pérez-Calderón & Martha del Pilar Rodríguez-García, 2021. "Eco-Efficiency and Stock Market Volatility: Emerging Markets Analysis," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, April.
    14. Poddi, Laura & Vergalli, Sergio, 2009. "Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect the Performance of Firms?," Institutions and Markets Papers 52531, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    15. Siddique, Md Abubakar & Akhtaruzzaman, Md & Rashid, Afzalur & Hammami, Helmi, 2021. "Carbon disclosure, carbon performance and financial performance: International evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    16. A. J. Stagliano, 2017. "Carbon Trading Reporting: The Case of Spanish Companies," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 23(2), pages 231-243, May.
    17. Chen, Di & Hu, Haiqing & Wang, Ning & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2024. "The impact of green finance on transformation to green energy: Evidence from industrial enterprises in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    18. Hsu, Audrey Wen-hsin & Wang, Tawei, 2013. "Does the market value corporate response to climate change?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 195-206.
    19. Claus Holm & Pall Rikhardsson, 2008. "Experienced and Novice Investors: Does Environmental Information Influence Investment Allocation Decisions?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 537-557.
    20. Zhang, Weike & Luo, Qian & Zhang, Yufeng & Yu, Ao, 2023. "Does green credit policy matter for corporate exploratory innovation? Evidence from Chinese enterprises," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 820-834.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:9:p:398-:d:1472317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.