IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i8p345-d1452706.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting and Macroeconomic Variables Explaining Investment: An Empirical Study with Panel Data in the Portuguese Textile Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Isabel Oliveira

    (Faculty of Economic and Business Sciences, COMEGI, Lusíada University, 4100-348 Porto, Portugal)

  • Jorge Figueiredo

    (Faculty of Economic and Business Sciences, COMEGI, Lusíada University, 4100-348 Porto, Portugal)

  • Maria Faria

    (Faculty of Economic and Business Sciences, COMEGI, Lusíada University, 4100-348 Porto, Portugal)

  • Francisco V. Martins

    (Faculty of Economic and Business Sciences, COMEGI, Lusíada University, 4100-348 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

This study analyses the variables that influence investment in a sample of small, labour-intensive companies in a sector that is highly dependent on external demand and the world economy. The aim is to test the three traditional theories of investment (neoclassical theory, free cash flow theory and agency theory), as well as consider the existence of other variables endogenous and exogenous to the company, in order to obtain a model that is appropriate to the reality of the companies in the sample, which consists of 3859 companies in the Portuguese textile sector, for the period from 2010 to 2022. Although there are many studies on the subject, the sample of companies used is different from the others, presenting a unique perspective for understanding investment dynamics in this type of company. The methodology used involves estimating panel data models using the GMM method. The results show that there is a statistically significant and negative relationship between liquidity and asset turnover and investment, so the free cash flow and neoclassical theories, respectively, are partially verified. The agency theory is not confirmed. Other variables are significant in explaining investment: the debt structure is statistically negative, while the size of the company, the GDP and the interest rate are statistically positive. Return on assets proved not to be statistically significant in explaining investment. To summarise, the study highlights the need for financial strategies adapted to the unique characteristics of small businesses.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabel Oliveira & Jorge Figueiredo & Maria Faria & Francisco V. Martins, 2024. "Accounting and Macroeconomic Variables Explaining Investment: An Empirical Study with Panel Data in the Portuguese Textile Sector," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:345-:d:1452706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/8/345/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/8/345/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jensen, Michael C, 1986. "Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(2), pages 323-329, May.
    2. Myers, Stewart C. & Majluf, Nicholas S., 1984. "Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 187-221, June.
    3. Jorgenson, Dale W, 1971. "Econometric Studies of Investment Behavior: A Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 9(4), pages 1111-1147, December.
    4. Syed Shujaat Ali Shah & Zia Khan, 2021. "Creating advocates: understanding the roles of CSR and firm innovativeness," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(2), pages 95-106, June.
    5. Paulo Maças Nunes & Z�lia Serrasqueiro, 2012. "Are young SMEs' survival determinants different? Empirical evidence using panel data," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(9), pages 849-855, June.
    6. Artur Morgado & Julio Pindado, 2003. "The Underinvestment and Overinvestment Hypotheses: an Analysis Using Panel Data," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 9(2), pages 163-177, June.
    7. Sangita Choudhary, 2016. "Equity Investment Decisions: Determinants for Retail Investors," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 5(2), pages 131-144, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Huaibing, 2024. "Why isn't composite equity issuance favored by the stock market? A risk-based explanation for the anomaly," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Fabio Bertoni & Massimo G. Colombo & Annalisa Croce, 2010. "The Effect of Venture Capital Financing on the Sensitivity to Cash Flow of Firm's Investments," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 16(4), pages 528-551, September.
    3. Julio Pindado & Chabela De La Torre, 2009. "Effect of ownership structure on underinvestment and overinvestment: empirical evidence from Spain," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 49(2), pages 363-383, June.
    4. Hsiao-Fen Hsiao & Tingyong Zhong & Hasan Dincer, 2019. "Analysing Managers’ Financial Motivation for Sustainable Investment Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Ahmad, Muhammad Munir & Hunjra, Ahmed Imran & Taskin, Dilvin, 2023. "Do asymmetric information and leverage affect investment decisions?," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 337-345.
    6. Rizov, Marian, 2008. "Corporate capital structure and how soft budget constraints may affect it," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 22(4), pages 648-684.
    7. Alvarez, Roberto & Jara, Mauricio & Pombo, Carlos, 2018. "Do institutional blockholders influence corporate investment? Evidence from emerging markets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 38-64.
    8. Valentina Peruzzi, 2017. "Does family ownership structure affect investment-cash flow sensitivity? Evidence from Italian SMEs," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(43), pages 4378-4393, September.
    9. Muhammad Sadiq Shahid & Razaz Houssien Felimban & Khawar Naheed & Usman Aleem & Shaiza Nawaz, 2018. "Ownership Structures, Investors Confidence And Financial Decisions In Family Firms: Evidence From Gcc Markets," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 14(1), pages 14-15.
    10. Muhammad Sadiq Shahid & Razaz Houssien Felimban & Khawar Naheed & Usman Aleem & Shaiza Nawaz, 2018. "Ownership Structures, Investors Confidence And Financial Decisions In Family Firms: Evidence From Gcc Markets," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 14(1), pages 52-68.
    11. Grzegorz Pawlina & Luc Renneboog, 2005. "Is Investment‐Cash Flow Sensitivity Caused by Agency Costs or Asymmetric Information? Evidence from the UK," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 11(4), pages 483-513, September.
    12. Hobdari, Bersant & Jones, Derek C. & Mygind, Niels, 2009. "Capital investment and determinants of financial constraints in Estonia," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 344-359, December.
    13. Marc B.J. Schauten & Dick van Dijk & Jan†Paul van der Waal, 2013. "Corporate Governance and the Value of Excess Cash Holdings of Large European Firms," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 19(5), pages 991-1016, November.
    14. Xiao, Min & You, Jiaxing & Zhao, Jingwen, 2017. "How Does Being Public Affect Firm Investment? Further Evidence from China," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 1-21.
    15. Mehmet Balcilar & Serhan Çiftçioğlu & Hasan Güngör, 2016. "The Effects Of Financial Development On Investment In Turkey," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 61(04), pages 1-21, September.
    16. Marco Botta & Luca Colombo, 2016. "Macroeconomic and Institutional Determinants of Capital Structure Decisions," DISCE - Working Papers del Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza def038, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    17. Khémiri, Wafa & Noubbigh, Hédi, 2020. "Size-threshold effect in debt-firm performance nexus in the sub-Saharan region: A Panel Smooth Transition Regression approach," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 335-344.
    18. Bo-Hung Chiou & Shen-Ho Chang, 2020. "Influence of Investment Efficiency by Managers and Accounting Conservatism on Idiosyncratic Risks to Investors," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8.
    19. Asmund Rygh & Gabriel R. G. Benito, 2018. "Capital Structure of Foreign Direct Investments: A Transaction Cost Analysis," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 389-411, June.
    20. Bruinshoofd Allard & Kool Clemens, 2002. "The Determinants of Corporate Liquidity in the Netherlands," Research Memorandum 014, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:345-:d:1452706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.