IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i6p220-d1400864.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investing in US Timberland Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Jack Clark Francis

    (Department of Economics and Finance, Baruch College, New York, NY 10010, USA)

  • Ge Zhang

    (Department of Economics, Finance, and Global Business, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ 07470, USA)

Abstract

Are common stocks issued by timberland companies a good investment? Portfolios of large US timberland corporations are compared to simultaneous investments in a diversified US common stock index. Over a 20-year sample period it turns out that the US timberland corporations, on average, perform about as well as the highly diversified US stock market index. It is surprising that the timberland companies do not outperform the stock market indexes because, in order to encourage tree planting, the US Congress has almost completely exempted timberland companies from paying federal income taxes. Furthermore, it is scientifically impossible to assess the value of the large amounts of photosynthesis that the timberland companies produce. As a result of these two ambiguities, it is difficult to state decisively that the timberland companies are better investments than a diversified portfolio of common stocks. However, valuing timberland companies is more practical than endeavoring to value the trees directly.

Suggested Citation

  • Jack Clark Francis & Ge Zhang, 2024. "Investing in US Timberland Companies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-13, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:6:p:220-:d:1400864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/6/220/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/6/220/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Young, William E. & Trent, Robert H., 1969. "Geometric Mean Approximations of Individual Security and Portfolio Performance*," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(2), pages 179-199, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Markowitz, Harry, 2014. "Mean–variance approximations to expected utility," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 346-355.
    2. Marcus Berliant & Axel H. Watanabe, 2018. "A scale‐free transportation network explains the city‐size distribution," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 9(3), pages 1419-1451, November.
    3. Harry M. Markowitz, 2002. "Efficient Portfolios, Sparse Matrices, and Entities: A Retrospective," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 154-160, February.
    4. Yong, Luo & Bo, Zhu & Yong, Tang, 2013. "Dynamic optimal capital growth with risk constraints," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 586-594.
    5. Sonntag, Dominik, 2018. "Die Theorie der fairen geometrischen Rendite [The Theory of Fair Geometric Returns]," MPRA Paper 87082, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Locatelli, Giorgio & Mancini, Mauro, 2011. "Large and small baseload power plants: Drivers to define the optimal portfolios," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 7762-7775.
    7. Gregor Dorfleitner & Mai Nguyen, 2017. "A new approach for optimizing responsible investments dependently on the initial wealth," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(2), pages 81-98, March.
    8. Diamond, Harvey & Gelles, Gregory, 1999. "Gaussian approximation of expected utility," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 301-307, September.
    9. Robert H. Trent & Robert S. Kemp, 1984. "The Writings Of Henry A. Latané: A Compilation And Analysis," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 7(2), pages 161-174, June.
    10. Antonio Díaz & Carlos Esparcia, 2021. "Dynamic optimal portfolio choice under time-varying risk aversion," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 166, pages 1-22.
    11. Charles-Cadogan, G., 2018. "Losses loom larger than gains and reference dependent preferences in Bernoulli’s utility function," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 220-237.
    12. Robert Becker, 2012. "The Variance Drain and Jensen's Inequality," CAEPR Working Papers 2012-004, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Department of Economics, Indiana University Bloomington.
    13. Murad J. Antia & Richard L. Meyer, 1984. "The Growth Optimal Capital Structure: Manager Versus Shareholder Objectives," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 7(3), pages 259-267, September.
    14. Robert Becker, 2012. "The Variance Drain and Jensen's Inequality," Caepr Working Papers 2012-004, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Economics Department, Indiana University Bloomington.
    15. Soumalya Mukhopadhyay & Arnab Hazra & Amiya Ranjan Bhowmick & Sabyasachi Bhattacharya, 2016. "On comparison of relative growth rates under different environmental conditions with application to biological data," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 74(3), pages 311-337, December.
    16. Cristinca FULGA, 2017. "Integrated Decision Support System for Portfolio Selection with Enhanced Behavioral Content," ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 51(3), pages 127-142.
    17. David E. Upton, 1982. "Single-Period Mean-Variance In A Multiperiod Context," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 5(1), pages 55-68, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:6:p:220-:d:1400864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.