IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i6p216-d1398449.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the Components of Perceived Risk Factors Affecting Mobile Payment Adoption

Author

Listed:
  • Eugene Bland

    (Department of Accounting, Finance, and Business Law, College of Business, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, 6300 Ocean Dr., Corpus Christi, TX 78412, USA)

  • Chuleeporn Changchit

    (Department of Decision Sciences and Economics, College of Business, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, 6300 Ocean Dr., Corpus Christi, TX 78412, USA)

  • Charles Changchit

    (Department of Decision Sciences and Economics, College of Business, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, 6300 Ocean Dr., Corpus Christi, TX 78412, USA)

  • Robert Cutshall

    (Department of Decision Sciences and Economics, College of Business, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, 6300 Ocean Dr., Corpus Christi, TX 78412, USA)

  • Long Pham

    (Department of Decision Sciences and Economics, College of Business, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, 6300 Ocean Dr., Corpus Christi, TX 78412, USA)

Abstract

As smartphone ownership rapidly expands, mobile payment options are gaining popularity due to the portability and convenience they offer. This study examines attitudes towards adopting mobile payment, focusing on the component risk, which consists of multiple dimensions including performance, financial, time, psychological, and social risks. The study uses a quantitative approach, collecting data through a survey distributed to mobile payment users, with 361 respondents in the United States. The survey instrument includes measures of performance and psychological risk, as well as attitudes towards mobile payment acceptance. Data analysis using SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 24.0 reveals that both performance and psychological risk significantly negatively impact attitudes towards mobile payment acceptance, underscoring the importance of mobile payment service providers implementing effective risk management policies to improve users’ positive attitudes towards their platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Eugene Bland & Chuleeporn Changchit & Charles Changchit & Robert Cutshall & Long Pham, 2024. "Investigating the Components of Perceived Risk Factors Affecting Mobile Payment Adoption," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:6:p:216-:d:1398449
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/6/216/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/6/216/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tang, Jia-Wei & Tsai, Pei-Hsuan, 2024. "Exploring critical determinants influencing businesses’ continuous usage of mobile payment in post-pandemic era: Based on the UTAUT2 perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Kaur, Puneet & Dhir, Amandeep & Bodhi, Rahul & Singh, Tripti & Almotairi, Mohammad, 2020. "Why do people use and recommend m-wallets?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    3. Forsythe, Sandra M. & Shi, Bo, 2003. "Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in Internet shopping," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 867-875, November.
    4. Hameed, Irfan & Akram, Umair & Khan, Yamna & Khan, Naveed R. & Hameed, Imran, 2024. "Exploring consumer mobile payment innovations: An investigation into the relationship between coping theory factors, individual motivations, social influence and word of mouth," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    5. Hien Nguyen & Long Pham & Stan Williamson & Nguyen Duy Hung, 2020. "Individual investors' satisfaction and loyalty in online securities trading using the technology acceptance model," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(2), pages 239-266.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudia BOBALCA, 2015. "The Loyal Customers’ Perception Regarding The Online Buying Process," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 7(2), pages 241-255, August.
    2. Jebarajakirthy, Charles & Shankar, Amit, 2021. "Impact of online convenience on mobile banking adoption intention: A moderated mediation approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    3. Kim, Jeeyeon & Kim, Mingyung & Choi, Jeonghye & Trivedi, Minakshi, 2019. "Offline social interactions and online shopping demand: Does the degree of social interactions matter?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 373-381.
    4. Wei-Lun Chang & Li-Ming Chen & Takako Hashimoto, 2022. "Cashless Japan: Unlocking Influential Risk on Mobile Payment Service," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 1515-1528, October.
    5. Nicoleta-Dorina RACOLŢA-PAINA & Theodora Alexandra LUCA, 2011. "Nowadays Online Consumers' Rights And Interests. Case Study- The Romanian Educated Online Young Consumer," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 6(2), Summer.
    6. Li, Chen & Swaminathan, Srinivasan & Kim, Junhee, 2021. "The role of marketing channels in consumers’ promotional point redemption decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 314-323.
    7. Talwar, Manish & Talwar, Shalini & Kaur, Puneet & Tripathy, Naliniprava & Dhir, Amandeep, 2021. "Has financial attitude impacted the trading activity of retail investors during the COVID-19 pandemic?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    8. Hem C. Basnet & Ficawoyi Donou‐Adonsou, 2016. "Internet, consumer spending, and credit card balance: Evidence from US consumers," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 11-22, September.
    9. Faqih, Khaled M.S., 2016. "An empirical analysis of factors predicting the behavioral intention to adopt Internet shopping technology among non-shoppers in a developing country context: Does gender matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 140-164.
    10. Gensler, Sonja & Leeflang, Peter & Skiera, Bernd, 2012. "Impact of online channel use on customer revenues and costs to serve: Considering product portfolios and self-selection," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 192-201.
    11. Alrawad, Mahmaod & Lutfi, Abdalwali & Alyatama, Sundus & Al Khattab, Adel & Alsoboa, Sliman S. & Almaiah, Mohammed Amin & Ramadan, Mujtaba Hashim & Arafa, Hussin Mostafa & Ahmed, Nazar Ali & Alsyouf, , 2023. "Assessing customers perception of online shopping risks: A structural equation modeling–based multigroup analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    12. Xin Liao & Dongming Wu & Qianqian Zhang & Ge Han, 2021. "How to Improve Users’ Loyalty to Smart Health Devices? The Perspective of Compatibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Augustine Yao Dzathor, 2013. "Do Business Demographics Matter to Nascent Venture Performance? A Longitudinal Evidence from the Kauffman Firm Survey," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 3(8), pages 44-56, August.
    14. Silvina Santana & Sandra Loureiro, 2010. "Assessing Benefits And Risks Of Online Shopping In Spain And Scotland," Portuguese Journal of Management Studies, ISEG, Universidade de Lisboa, vol. 0(2), pages 161-172.
    15. León, Carlos, 2021. "The dawn of a mobile payment scheme: The case of Movii," Working papers 78, Red Investigadores de Economía.
    16. Arias-Oliva, Mario & Pelegrín-Borondo, Jorge & Lara-Palma, Ana María & Juaneda-Ayensa, Emma, 2020. "Emerging cyborg products: An ethical market approach for market segmentation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    17. Kondo, Fumiyo N. & Okubo, Taishi, 2022. "Understanding multi-channel consumer behavior: A comparison between segmentations of multi-channel purchases by product category and overall products," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    18. Xiaolin Lin & Mauricio Featherman & Stoney L. Brooks & Nick Hajli, 2019. "Exploring Gender Differences in Online Consumer Purchase Decision Making: An Online Product Presentation Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 1187-1201, October.
    19. Kayode Ajewole & Elliott Dennis & Ted C. Schroeder & Jason Bergtold, 2021. "Relative valuation of food and non‐food risks with a comparison to actuarial values: A best–worst approach," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(6), pages 927-943, November.
    20. Tina M. Lowrey, 2008. "The Case for a Complexity Continuum," Working Papers 0051, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:6:p:216-:d:1398449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.