IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i2p48-d1327328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Governance and FinTech Innovation: Evidence from Saudi Banks

Author

Listed:
  • Ayth I. Almubarak

    (Accounting Department, Business School, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdullah A. Aljughaiman

    (Finance Department, Business School, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The rising adoption of FinTech is changing the financial sector. However, the determinants of FinTech have not been examined thoroughly. The purpose of this paper is to examine whether corporate governance is related to FinTech products in the banking sector, given that governance may influence the quantity and quality of innovation. Specifically, we investigate the association between the size of the board of directors, the percentage of independent directors on the board and FinTech services. Furthermore, we show how the composition of the board can influence the association between FinTech services and a bank’s performance. Using a sample of 12 Saudi banks for the period 2014–2019, we find that board size is significantly and negatively associated with a bank’s FinTech score. We further show that independent members on the board contribute to performance by bringing more FinTech services (innovation development) to the banks. As the first study examining the determinants of FinTech in the Saudi banking sector, this paper may help regulators to better understand the drivers of FinTech and its quality in the banking sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayth I. Almubarak & Abdullah A. Aljughaiman, 2024. "Corporate Governance and FinTech Innovation: Evidence from Saudi Banks," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-12, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:2:p:48-:d:1327328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/2/48/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/2/48/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael C. Jensen, 2010. "The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 22(1), pages 43-58, January.
    2. Dr. Nader Alber, 2011. "The Effect Of Banking Expansion On Profit Efficiency Of Saudi Arabia Commercial Banks," Journal of Global Business and Economics, Global Research Agency, vol. 3(1), pages 11-23, July.
    3. Dur Almulla & Abdullah A. Aljughaiman & Vassilios Papavassiliou, 2021. "Does financial technology matter? Evidence from an alternative banking system," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 1934978-193, January.
    4. Itay Goldstein & Wei Jiang & G Andrew Karolyi, 2019. "To FinTech and Beyond," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(5), pages 1647-1661.
    5. Cheng, Shijun, 2008. "Board size and the variability of corporate performance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 157-176, January.
    6. Beck, Thorsten & Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli & Merrouche, Ouarda, 2013. "Islamic vs. conventional banking: Business model, efficiency and stability," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 433-447.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghosh, Saibal, 2018. "Governance reforms and performance of MENA banks: Are disclosures effective?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 78-95.
    2. Olubunmi Faleye & Rani Hoitash & Udi Hoitash, 2018. "Industry expertise on corporate boards," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 441-479, February.
    3. Sugato Chakravarty & Chiraphol N. Chiyachantana & Christine Jiang, 2011. "THE CHOICE OF TRADING VENUE AND RELATIVE PRICE IMPACT OF INSTITUTIONAL TRADING: ADRs VERSUS THE UNDERLYING SECURITIES IN THEIR LOCAL MARKETS," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 34(4), pages 537-567, December.
    4. Jaspreet Kaur & Madhu Vij & Ajay Kumar Chauhan, 2023. "Signals influencing corporate credit ratings—a systematic literature review," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 50(1), pages 91-114, March.
    5. Pongsapak Chindasombatcharoen & Pattanaporn Chatjuthamard & Pornsit Jiraporn & Sirimon Treepongkaruna, 2022. "Achieving sustainable development goals through board size and innovation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 664-677, August.
    6. An, Suwei, 2023. "Essays on incentive contracts, M&As, and firm risk," Other publications TiSEM dd97d2f5-1c9d-47c5-ba62-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Dah, Mustafa A. & Frye, Melissa B., 2017. "Is board compensation excessive?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 566-585.
    8. Bigelli, Marco & Mengoli, Stefano & Sandri, Sandro, 2023. "ESG score, board structure and the impact of the non-financial reporting directive on European firms," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    9. Taruntej Singh Arora, 2020. "Impact of Corporate Governance on Credit Ratings: An Empirical Study in the Indian Context," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 13(2), pages 140-164, December.
    10. Pier Luigi Marchini & Veronica Tibiletti & Alice Medioli & Gianluca Gabrielli, 2021. "Corporate Ownership Structure as a Determinant of “Risk Taking”: Insights from Italian Listed Companies," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(11), pages 138-138, July.
    11. Justin Law & Wayne Yu, 2018. "Corporate spinoffs and executive compensation," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    12. Mohamed Khalil & Aydin Ozkan, 2016. "Board Independence, Audit Quality and Earnings Management: Evidence from Egypt," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 15(1), pages 84-118, April.
    13. Addo, Kwabena Aboah & Hussain, Nazim & Iqbal, Jamshed, 2021. "Corporate Governance and Banking Systemic Risk: A Test of the Bundling Hypothesis," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    14. Enalto de Oliveira Gondrige & Ademir Clemente & Márcia Maria dos Santos Bortolocci Espejo, 2012. "Composition of the board and firm value of brazilian public companies," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 9(3), pages 71-93, July.
    15. Faleye, Olubunmi, 2015. "The costs of a (nearly) fully independent board," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 49-62.
    16. Junaid Haider & Hong-Xing Fang, 2018. "CEO power, corporate risk taking and role of large shareholders," Journal of Financial Economic Policy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(1), pages 55-72, April.
    17. Aman, Hiroyuki & Nguyen, Pascal, 2013. "Does good governance matter to debtholders? Evidence from the credit ratings of Japanese firms," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 14-34.
    18. Lehn, Kenneth & Patro, Sukesh & Zhao, Mengxin, 2008. "Determinants of the Size and Structure of Corporate Boards: 1935-2000," CEI Working Paper Series 2008-13, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    19. Dulani Jayasuriya Daluwathumullagamage & Alexandra Sims, 2020. "Blockchain-Enabled Corporate Governance and Regulation," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-41, June.
    20. Pascal Nguyen & Nahid Rahman, 2015. "Which governance characteristics affect the incidence of divestitures in Australia?," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 40(2), pages 351-374, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:2:p:48-:d:1327328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.