IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v16y2023i2p133-d1071243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship between Changes in Corporate Governance Characteristics and Intellectual Capital

Author

Listed:
  • Farzaneh Nassirzadeh

    (Faculty of Administrative and Economic Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad 9177948974, Iran)

  • Davood Askarany

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, Business School, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand)

  • Solmaz Arefi-Asl

    (Faculty of Administrative and Economic Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad 9177948974, Iran)

Abstract

The primary goal of this study was to investigate the effects of changes in corporate governance elements on a company’s valuable resources (such as intellectual capital and its components). Previous studies have examined the impacts of some corporate governance characteristics on intellectual capital performance as a whole and they have produced inconclusive and different results. This paper examines the effects of some corporate governance characteristics (i.e., the change in CEO, the evolution of auditor, the change in board independence, and the change in institutional ownership) on intellectual capital and its components (i.e., capital employed, human capital, and structural capital). This research is based on a quantitative study and the selected sample contains 1170 observations from 220 companies listed on the Middle East Stock Exchange from 2011 to 2018. The research findings show a positive and significant relationship between an increase in institutional ownership and intellectual capital and its two components (human capital and structural capital). The results support the relationship between a change in auditor and intellectual capital and human capital efficiency. Further, a positive and significant association was found between an increase in board independence and human capital. However, no relationship was found between a change of CEO and intellectual capital or any of its components. This study extends the research field of corporate governance by studying the effects of changes in corporate governance characteristics on intellectual capital for the first time. Given the significant role of intellectual capital in the performance of firms, this study provides essential information to organisations’ decision makers.

Suggested Citation

  • Farzaneh Nassirzadeh & Davood Askarany & Solmaz Arefi-Asl, 2023. "The Relationship between Changes in Corporate Governance Characteristics and Intellectual Capital," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:2:p:133-:d:1071243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/2/133/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/2/133/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elyasiani, Elyas & Jia, Jingyi, 2010. "Distribution of institutional ownership and corporate firm performance," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 606-620, March.
    2. Chen, Kevin C.W., 2006. "Board composition, regulatory regime, and voluntary disclosure," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 290-292.
    3. Kyung-Chun Mun, 2022. "Stock market reaction and adjustment speed to multiple announcements of accounting restatements," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 46(1), pages 22-67, January.
    4. Dechow, Patricia M. & Sloan, Richard G., 1991. "Executive incentives and the horizon problem : An empirical investigation," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 51-89, March.
    5. Stephen Korutaro Nkundabanyanga, 2016. "Board governance, intellectual capital and firm performance," Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(1), pages 20-45, May.
    6. Jihad Al Okaily & Rob Dixon & Aly Salama, 2019. "Corporate governance quality and premature revenue recognition: evidence from the UK," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(1), pages 79-99, January.
    7. Oxelheim, Lars & Randoy, Trond, 2003. "The impact of foreign board membership on firm value," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(12), pages 2369-2392, December.
    8. James Keenan & Maria Aggestam, 2001. "Corporate Governance and Intellectual Capital: some conceptualisations," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(4), pages 259-275, October.
    9. Helwege, Jean & Intintoli, Vincent J. & Zhang, Andrew, 2012. "Voting with their feet or activism? Institutional investors’ impact on CEO turnover," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 22-37.
    10. Ranjith Appuhami & Mohammed Bhuyan, 2015. "Examining the influence of corporate governance on intellectual capital efficiency: Evidence from top service firms in Australia," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 30(4/5), pages 347-372, May.
    11. Fama, Eugene F & Jensen, Michael C, 1983. "Separation of Ownership and Control," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(2), pages 301-325, June.
    12. Jihad Al Okaily & Rob Dixon & Aly Salama, 2019. "Corporate governance quality and premature revenue recognition: evidence from the UK," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(1), pages 79-99, January.
    13. Karin Jonnergård & Matts Kärreman & Claes Svensson, 2004. "The Impact of Changes in the Corporate Governance System on the Boards of Directors Experiences from Swedish Listed Companies," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 113-152, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mosab I. Tabash & Adel Ahmed & Linda Nalini Daniel & Yasmeen Elsantil, 2023. "Impact of Board Ownership Structure on Firm Value and Excessive Cash Holdings: Evidence from Pakistan," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 27(3), pages 109-134, September.
    2. Mahla Afghahi & Farzaneh Nassirzadeh & Davood Askarany, 2024. "Exploring the impact of customer concentration on stock price crash risk," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vincenzo Scafarto & Federica Ricci & Elisabetta Magnaghi & Salvatore Ferri, 2021. "Board structure and intellectual capital efficiency: does the family firm status matter?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(3), pages 841-878, September.
    2. Ahsan Habib & Mabel D' Costa & Hedy Jiaying Huang & Md. Borhan Uddin Bhuiyan & Li Sun, 2020. "Determinants and consequences of financial distress: review of the empirical literature," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(S1), pages 1023-1075, April.
    3. Hasmanezan Hassan & Najihah Marha Yaacob, 2019. "Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Intellectual Capital Efficiency: Evidence from Malaysia," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 83-95, January.
    4. Ines Maraghni & Mehdi Nekhili, 2017. "Audit committee characteristics and audit fees: Evidence from France [Caractéristiques du comité d’audit et honoraires d’audit : cas des entreprises françaises]," Post-Print hal-01907594, HAL.
    5. Ebrahim, Ahmed & Fattah, Tarek Abdel, 2015. "Corporate governance and initial compliance with IFRS in emerging markets: The case of income tax accounting in Egypt," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 46-60.
    6. Ines Maraghni & Mehdi Nekhili & Tawhid Chtioui, 2016. "Caractéristiques du comité d'audit et étendue du reporting sur le contrôle interne : cas des entreprises françaises," Post-Print hal-01901185, HAL.
    7. Berna Dogan Basar, 2021. "Corporate Governance, Cost of Capital and Tobin Q: Empirical Evidence from Turkey Listed Companies," South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, Association of Economic Universities of South and Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region, vol. 19(1), pages 51-78.
    8. Abdul Waheed & Qaisar Ali Malik, 2021. "Institutional Ownership Board Characteristics and Firm Performance: A Contingent Theoretical Approach," International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), IGI Global, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, April.
    9. David G. Sirmon & Jean–Luc Arregle & Michael A. Hitt & Justin W. Webb, 2008. "The Role of Family Influence in Firms’ Strategic Responses to Threat of Imitation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(6), pages 979-998, November.
    10. Muurling, Rutger & Lehnert, Thorsten, 2004. "Option-based compensation: a survey," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 365-401.
    11. Thi-Thanh Phan & Hai-Chin Yu, 2022. "Innovation, institutional ownerships and board diversity," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 1647-1693, November.
    12. Ammar Ali Gull & Ammar Abid & Rashid Latief & Muhammad Usman, 2021. "Women on board and auditors’ assessment of the risk of material misstatement," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(4), pages 679-708, December.
    13. Aman, Hiroyuki & Nguyen, Pascal, 2013. "Does good governance matter to debtholders? Evidence from the credit ratings of Japanese firms," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 14-34.
    14. Liang, Qi & Xu, Pisun & Jiraporn, Pornsit, 2013. "Board characteristics and Chinese bank performance," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 2953-2968.
    15. Réal Labelle & Claude Francoeur & Faten Lakhal, 2015. "To Regulate Or Not To Regulate? Early Evidence on the Means Used Around the World to Promote Gender Diversity in the Boardroom," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(4), pages 339-363, July.
    16. Mai Dao & Hua-Wei Huang & Jishan Zhu, 2012. "The Effects of Audit Committee Members' Age and Additional Directorships on the Cost of Equity Capital in the USA," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 607-643, September.
    17. Du, Yan & Deloof, Marc & Jorissen, Ann, 2015. "The Roles of Subsidiary Boards in Multinational Enterprises," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 169-181.
    18. Doğan, Mesut, 2020. "Institutional Ownership and Firm Value: A Study on the Bist Manufacturing Index," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 99(2), pages 59-75.
    19. Hermes, Cornelis & Oxelheim, L. & Randoy, Trond & Hooghiemstra, Reginald, 2015. "The impact of board internationalization on earnings management," Research Report 15010-I&O, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    20. Salau ABDULMALIK O. & Ayoib CHE AHMAD, 2016. "Boardroom diversity and audit fees: director ethnicity, independence and nationality," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 14(136), pages 413-413, Aprilie.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:2:p:133-:d:1071243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.