IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v16y2023i2p128-d1070399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of the Financial Flow Model for the Sustainable Development of an Industrial Enterprise

Author

Listed:
  • Farida F. Galimulina

    (Logistics and Management Department, Kazan National Research Technological University, 420015 Kazan, Russia)

  • Marina V. Shinkevich

    (Logistics and Management Department, Kazan National Research Technological University, 420015 Kazan, Russia)

  • Naira V. Barsegyan

    (Logistics and Management Department, Kazan National Research Technological University, 420015 Kazan, Russia)

Abstract

The review of modern methodological approaches to assessing the sustainable development of an industrial enterprise revealed the absence of generally accepted integral tools and the connection sustainable development trends with financial flows. To fill this gap this, taking into account the principle of balanced development economic, environmental and social components aimed. The purpose of the study is the development of a financial flow management model for the sustainable development of an industrial enterprise (using the example of a large Russian petrochemical enterprise). To achieve the goal of the purpose, the following methods implemented systematic approach, analysis and synthesis, comparative analysis, analysis of dynamics series, correlation analysis, regression analysis, solving the linear programming problem. As a result of the study, we came to conclusion about the shift of the enterprise’s focus on environmental issues; the growth of the integral indicator of sustainable development of an industrial enterprise; the negative impact of credit resources on the aggregate indicator. The novelty of the study lies in the development of a new methodological solution, which is the basis of the financial management model for the sustainable development of the enterprise: it is adequate to the level of microeconomic system; covers three ways of measuring sustainable development and the possibility of choosing the best quality; allows to implement a proactive approach to managing financial flows with the principles of sustainable development of the enterprise (existing approaches either represent only a set of indicators or addressed the diagnosis of a specific subsystem, either do not consider the relationship between financial flows and the aggregated indicator of sustainable development of the enterprise).

Suggested Citation

  • Farida F. Galimulina & Marina V. Shinkevich & Naira V. Barsegyan, 2023. "Development of the Financial Flow Model for the Sustainable Development of an Industrial Enterprise," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:2:p:128-:d:1070399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/2/128/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/2/128/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Serhiy Lyeonov & Tetyana Pimonenko & Yuriy Bilan & Dalia Štreimikienė & Grzegorz Mentel, 2019. "Assessment of Green Investments’ Impact on Sustainable Development: Linking Gross Domestic Product Per Capita, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Renewable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-12, October.
    2. Ahmad, Munir & Khan, Irfan & Shahzad Khan, Muhammad Qaiser & Jabeen, Gul & Jabeen, Hafiza Samra & Işık, Cem, 2023. "Households' perception-based factors influencing biogas adoption: Innovation diffusion framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleksandra Kuzior & Aleksy Kwilinski & Ihor Hroznyi, 2021. "The Factorial-Reflexive Approach to Diagnosing the Executors’ and Contractors’ Attitude to Achieving the Objectives by Energy Supplying Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Wang, Xiuli, 2023. "Exploring the role of resource industry dependence and green finance in green development efficiency in the context of post-Covid-19 period," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    3. Jie, Huo & Khan, Irfan & Alharthi, Majed & Zafar, Muhammad Wasif & Saeed, Asif, 2023. "Sustainable energy policy, socio-economic development, and ecological footprint: The economic significance of natural resources, population growth, and industrial development," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    4. Iryna Sotnyk & Tetiana Kurbatova & Yaroslavna Romaniuk & Olha Prokopenko & Viktoriya Gonchar & Yuriy Sayenko & Gunnar Prause & Aleksander Sapiński, 2022. "Determining the Optimal Directions of Investment in Regional Renewable Energy Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, May.
    5. Han Yan & Md. Qamruzzaman & Sylvia Kor, 2023. "Nexus between Green Investment, Fiscal Policy, Environmental Tax, Energy Price, Natural Resources, and Clean Energy—A Step towards Sustainable Development by Fostering Clean Energy Inclusion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-25, September.
    6. Alina Vysochyna & Natalia Stoyanets & Grzegorz Mentel & Tadeusz Olejarz, 2020. "Environmental Determinants of a Country’s Food Security in Short-Term and Long-Term Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Radosław Miśkiewicz, 2020. "Efficiency of Electricity Production Technology from Post-Process Gas Heat: Ecological, Economic and Social Benefits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Yahya, Farzan & Lee, Chien-Chiang, 2023. "Disentangling the asymmetric effect of financialization on the green output gap," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    9. Quan Xiao & Yu Wang & Haojie Liao & Gang Han & Yunjie Liu, 2023. "The Impact of Digital Inclusive Finance on Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity: A Study Based on China’s Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Mariusz Dacko & Aleksandra Płonka & Łukasz Satoła & Aneta Dacko, 2021. "Sustainable Development According to the Opinions of Polish Experts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Valerii Havrysh & Antonina Kalinichenko & Grzegorz Mentel & Tadeusz Olejarz, 2020. "Commercial Biogas Plants: Lessons for Ukraine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    12. Iryna Sotnyk & Tetiana Kurbatova & Oleksandr Kubatko & Olha Prokopenko & Gunnar Prause & Yevhen Kovalenko & Galyna Trypolska & Uliana Pysmenna, 2021. "Energy Security Assessment of Emerging Economies under Global and Local Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Umar, Muhammad & Safi, Adnan, 2023. "Do green finance and innovation matter for environmental protection? A case of OECD economies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    14. Wei, Zhao & Huang, Lihua, 2022. "Does renewable energy matter to achieve sustainable development? Fresh evidence from ten Asian economies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 759-767.
    15. Chien, FengSheng & Paramaiah, Ch & joseph, Robinson & Pham, Hong Chuong & Phan, Thi Thu Hien & Ngo, Thanh Quang, 2023. "The impact of eco-innovation, trade openness, financial development, green energy and government governance on sustainable development in ASEAN countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 259-268.
    16. Restu Arisanti & Suci Purnamawati & Agus Muslim, 2024. "Determinants of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Transportation Sector in Indonesia: Official Statistics and Big Data Approach," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(1), pages 86-97, January.
    17. Chien, Fengsheng & Hsu, Ching-Chi & Ozturk, Ilhan & Sharif, Arshian & Sadiq, Muhammad, 2022. "The role of renewable energy and urbanization towards greenhouse gas emission in top Asian countries: Evidence from advance panel estimations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 207-216.
    18. Tetyana Pimonenko & Yuriy Bilan & Jakub Horák & Liudmyla Starchenko & Waldemar Gajda, 2020. "Green Brand of Companies and Greenwashing under Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    19. Yurii Kharazishvili & Aleksy Kwilinski & Oleksandr Sukhodolia & Henryk Dzwigol & Dmytro Bobro & Janusz Kotowicz, 2021. "The Systemic Approach for Estimating and Strategizing Energy Security: The Case of Ukraine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-30, April.
    20. Ma, Qiang & Liu, Xin & Wang, Wei-Guo & Xue, Jing, 2023. "Natural resources extraction and COP26 target: Evaluating the role of green finance," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:2:p:128-:d:1070399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.