IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v15y2022i8p327-d870019.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Overview of Social Assessment Methods for the Economic Analysis of Cultural Heritage Investments

Author

Listed:
  • Sanja Tišma

    (Institute for Development and International Relations IRMO, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Aleksandra Uzelac

    (Institute for Development and International Relations IRMO, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Daniela Angelina Jelinčić

    (Institute for Development and International Relations IRMO, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Sunčana Franić

    (Institute for Development and International Relations IRMO, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Mira Mileusnić Škrtić

    (Faculty of Organization and Informatics, University of Zagreb, 42000 Varaždin, Croatia)

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of methods for assessing social impacts, their achievements, and possibilities of application in everyday practice for assessing the worth of investments in cultural heritage conservation, as well as its sustainable use. It gives an overview of available methods for social assessment and points to a set of interdisciplinary indicators by which those impacts can be evaluated. Possibilities to use social impact analysis in the assessment of cultural heritage are presented in this paper through two case studies in the Republic of Croatia: the implementation of social evaluation management plan for the old town of Buzet and the evaluation of social effects of investing in the museum Ivana’s House of Fairy Tales. Some qualitative indicators of the collected surveys related to social effects are described, while the analysis of the availability of such indicators and the scientific basis of the collected answers are provided. In conclusion, the contribution of the methodological tools used and social impact assessments in the evaluation of cultural heritage interventions are presented, while suggestions are made for various decision- makers on those broader methods and benefits compared with the use of only financial and economic impact evaluations.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanja Tišma & Aleksandra Uzelac & Daniela Angelina Jelinčić & Sunčana Franić & Mira Mileusnić Škrtić, 2022. "Overview of Social Assessment Methods for the Economic Analysis of Cultural Heritage Investments," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:8:p:327-:d:870019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/8/327/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/8/327/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patricia Rogers, 2014. "Theory of Change: Methodological Briefs - Impact Evaluation No. 2," Papers innpub747, Methodological Briefs.
    2. Antonio Ariza-Montes & Antonio Sianes & Vicente Fernández-Rodríguez & Carmen López-Martín & Mercedes Ruíz-Lozano & Pilar Tirado-Valencia, 2021. "Social Return on Investment (SROI) to Assess the Impacts of Tourism: A Case Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blackman, Allen & Goff, Leonard & Rivera Planter, Marisol, 2018. "Does eco-certification stem tropical deforestation? Forest Stewardship Council certification in Mexico," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 306-333.
    2. Harvey, Charles & Maclean, Mairi & Price, Michael, 2020. "Executive remuneration and the limits of disclosure as an instrument of corporate governance," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    3. Terrapon-Pfaff, Julia & Gröne, Marie-Christine & Dienst, Carmen & Ortiz, Willington, 2018. "Productive use of energy – Pathway to development? Reviewing the outcomes and impacts of small-scale energy projects in the global south," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 198-209.
    4. Maru, Yiheyis Taddele & Sparrow, Ashley & Butler, James R.A. & Banerjee, Onil & Ison, Ray & Hall, Andy & Carberry, Peter, 2018. "Towards appropriate mainstreaming of “Theory of Change” approaches into agricultural research for development: Challenges and opportunities," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 344-353.
    5. Andrew S. Mitchell, 2021. "Rethinking theories of change in the light of enactive cognitive science: Contributions to community‐scale local sustainability initiatives," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 448-458, August.
    6. Clapham, Kathleen & Manning, Claire & Williams, Kathryn & O’Brien, Ginger & Sutherland, Margaret, 2017. "Using a logic model to evaluate the Kids Together early education inclusion program for children with disabilities and additional needs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 96-105.
    7. Leonie Drooge & Jack Spaapen, 2022. "Evaluation and monitoring of transdisciplinary collaborations," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 747-761, June.
    8. Fatma Koroglu, 2023. "Social Impact & Project Performance Measurement Methods and Challenges in Practice: A Study on Women Empowerment NGOs," GATR Journals jber232, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    9. Bellucci, Marco & Biggeri, Mario & Nitti, Carmela & Terenzi, Linda, 2023. "Accounting for disability and work inclusion in tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    10. José Pablo Abeal Vázquez & Pilar Tirado-Valencia & Mercedes Ruiz-Lozano, 2021. "The Impact and Value of a Tourism Product: A Hybrid Sustainability Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    11. Hyoungkun Park & Jong Dae Kim, 2020. "Transition towards green banking: role of financial regulators and financial institutions," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-25, December.
    12. King, Julian, 2021. "Expanding theory-based evaluation: Incorporating value creation in a theory of change," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:8:p:327-:d:870019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.